Challenges in sunflower breeding for cold tolerance

Authors

  • V. P. Kolomatska Yuriev Plant Production Institute of NAAS, Ukraine
  • L. I. Relina Yuriev Plant Production Institute of NAAS, Ukraine
  • V. I. Syvenko Yuriev Plant Production Institute of NAAS, Ukraine
  • V. V. Andriienko Yuriev Plant Production Institute of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2023.293845

Keywords:

sunflower, cold tolerance, line, hybrid, linear regression

Abstract

Introduction. Sunflower is grown as an oilseed crop worldwide. For sunflower production, it is vital to have cold-tolerant hybrids. An appropriate method to assess cold tolerance is a prerequisite for successful breeding of cold-tolerant sunflower.

Purpose and Objectives. To evaluate cold tolerance of sunflower in the laboratory and its tolerance in the field, to identify promising combinations, to assess the capacity of a laboratory test to predict tolerance of sunflower in the field and to verify relationships of cold tolerance with ripeness group and yield.

Materials and Methods. Sunflower was grown in compliance with standard farming techniques. In total, 192 F1 hybrids were obtained. The lines and hybrids were screened for ability to germinate at above-zero low temperature by laboratory test. The field tolerance  at the initial stages of plant growth was determined with a 9-point scale. Relationships between the investigated parameters were analyzed by linear regression.

Results and Discussion. The highest field tolerance at the initial stages of plant growth was recorded for Kh4713V, Skh777А and Skh808А lines. However, they only conferred tolerance to some of their hybrids. On the other hand, several hybrids were fairly tolerant in the field though the tolerance scores of their parental lines ranged 1 to 5 points. There was no relationship between the ‘emergence – anthesis’ period and cold tolerance. A great degree of uncertainty is associated with predicting field tolerance of sunflower from its cold tolerance assessed by laboratory test. This laboratory test cannot be used to predict field tolerance of either lines or hybrids. There was a strong positive correlation between the field tolerance and seed yield in the lines, but the correlation coefficient for the hybrids indicated no significant correlation between these parameters.

Conclusions. At non-freezing low temperatures, the yield of the inbred sunflower lines was positively correlated with the field tolerance score at the early stages of plant growth and development. There was no significant difference in responses of early- and medium-ripening sunflower genotypes to cold exposure. Lakhanov’s cold germination test is not appropriate for evaluation of field tolerance in sunflower lines and hybrids.

References

Sunflower profile. Overview. Agricultural Marketing Resource Center. [Internet]. 2022 [updated Feb 2022; cited 2023 Sep 30]. Available from https://www.agmrc.org/commodities-products/grains-oilseeds/sunflower-profile

World sunflower production by country. [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Sep 30]. Available from https://www.atlasbig.com/en-us/countries-sunflower-production

Sunflower statistics. World supply and disappearance. National Sunflower Association. [Internet]. 2023 [updated 2023 Jan 13; cited 2023 Oct 5]. Available from https://www.sunflowernsa.com/stats/world-supply/

Melnyk ІО, Sahakyan А. Diversification of agrarian enterprises through the introduction of sunflower seed processing. Ahrosvit. 2018; 2: 23-27. [in Ukrainian]

Crop growing. Agriculture, forestry and fishery. Statistical information. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 May 5; cited 2023 Sep 30]. Available from: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian]

Kyrychenko VV, Kolomatska VP. Prospects of heterotic sunflower breeding oriented towards the ecological conditions of the forest-steppe of Ukraine. Selektsiia і Nasinnytstvo. 2006; 92: 20–31. [in Ukrainian]

Olesen JE, Bindi M. Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur J Agron. 2002: 16: 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7

Seguin B. Adaptation des systèmes de production agricole au changement climatique. CR Geosci. 2003; 335: 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-0713(03)00098-1

Škorić D. Sunflower breeding for resistance to abiotic stresses. Helia. 2009; 32(40): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5772/62159

Škorić D. Sunflower breeding for resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses. In: Shanker AK, Shanker C, editors. Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants - Recent Advances and Future Perspectives [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2023 August 25]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/62159

Debaeke Ph, Casadebaig P, Flenet F, Langlade N. Sunflower crop and climate change: Vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation potential from case-studies in Europe. OCL. 2017; 24(1): D102. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016052

Hnilickova H, Hejnak V, Lenka N, Jaroslava M, Skalicky M, Hnilička F, Philippe G. The effect of freezing temperature on physiological traits in sunflower. Plant Soil Env. 2017; 63: 375–380. https://doi.org/10.17221/214/2017-PSE

Tetreault H, Kawakami T, Ungerer M, Levy C. Low temperature tolerance in the perennial sunflower Helianthus maximiliani. Am Mid Nat. 2016; 175: 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1674/amid-175-01-91-102.1

Gutierrez A, Cantamutto M, Poverene M. Cold stress tolerance during early growth stages of naturalized Helianthus petiolaris populations. Helia. 2016; 39(64): 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/helia-2016-0007

Hewezi T, Léger M, El Kayal W, Gentzbittel L. Transcriptional profiling of sunflower plants growing under low temperatures reveals an extensive down-regulation of gene expression associated with chilling sensitivity. J Exp Bot. 2006; 57(12): 3109–3122. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl080

Bozhanova V, Petrova T. Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes for cold tolerance. Rastenievadni Nauki. 2000; 37: 705-707. [in Bulgarian]

Atanasova D, Maneva V. Using the indirect method for evaluation of influence in herbicides on cold resistance barley ІІ. Izsledvaniya Varhu Polskite Kulturi. 2010; VІ (3): 405 – 409. [in Bulgarian]

Bozhanova V, Dechev D, Todorovska E, Yanev Sh. Investigations of cold- and drought resistance in durum wheat. Izsledvaniya Varhu Polskite Kulturi. 2010; VІ (3): 347 – 354. [in Bulgarian]

Kyrychenko VV. Sunflower (Heliantus annus L.) breeding and seed production. Kh.: Magda; 2005. 387 p. [in Russian].

Lakhanov AP. Evaluation of cold tolerance of field crops. In: Drozdov SN, Yeryomin GV, Klimashevskiy EL, editors. Diagnostics of plant resistance to stressors. L.: VIR; 1988. P. 62-75. [in Russian]

Kyrychenko VV, Hurieva IA, Riabchun VK. Descriptor reference book for the Zea mays L. species. Kh.: IR UААN; 2009. 82 p. [in Ukrainian]

Linear regression calculator. Statistics Kingdom. Available from: https://www.statskingdom.com/linear-regression-calculator.html

De Smet I, Quint M, van Zanten M. High and low temperature signalling and response. J Exp Bot. 2021; 72(21): 7339–7344. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab447

Walbot V. How plants cope with temperature stress. BMC Biol. 2011; 9(1): 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-9-79

Dunn MA, Brown K, Lightowlers R, Hughes MA. A low-temperature-responsive gene from barley encodes a protein with single-stranded nucleic acid-binding activity which is phosphorylated in vitro. Plant Mol Biol 1996; 30(5): 947-959. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020806

Karlson D, Nakaminami K, Toyomasu T, Imai R. A cold-regulated nucleic acid-binding protein of winter wheat shares a domain with bacterial cold shock proteins. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277(38): 35248-35256. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M205774200

Chaikam V, Karlson D. Functional characterization of two cold shock domain proteins from Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Environ. 2008; 31(7): 995-1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01811.x.

Kim JS, Park SJ, Kwak KJ, Kim YO, Kim JY, Song J, Jang B, Jung CH, Kang H. Cold shock domain proteins and glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana can promote the cold adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(2): 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl884

Kim JS, Park SJ, Kwak KJ, Kim YO, Kim JY, Song J, Jang B, Jung CH, Kang H. Cold shock domain protein 3 regulates freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2007; 284(35): 23454-23460. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.000752

Park SJ, Kwak KJ, Oh TR, Kim YO, Kang H. Cold shock domain proteins affect seed germination and growth of Arabidopsis thaliana under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009; 50(4): 869-878. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcp037

Sasaki K., Kim MH, Imai R. Arabidopsis COLD SHOCK DOMAIN PROTEIN2 is a RNA chaperone that is regulated by cold and developmental signals. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007; 364(3): 633-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.059

Espevig T, Xu C, Aamlid TS, DaCosta M, Huang B. Proteomic responses during cold acclimation in association with freezing tolerance of velvet bentgrass. J Am Soc Hort Sci. 2012; 137(6): 391-399. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.137.6.391

Sasaki K, Imai R. Pleiotropic roles of cold shock domain proteins in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2012; 2:116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2011.00116

Chen M, Gan L, Zhang J, Shen Y, Qian J, Han M, Zhang C, Fan J, Sun S, Yan X. A Regulatory network of heat shock modules-photosynthesis-redox systems in response to cold stress across a latitudinal gradient in bermudagrass. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:751901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.751901

Al-Whaibi MH. Plant heat-shock proteins. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2011; 23(2): 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2010.06.02

Jacob P, Hirt H, Bendahmane A. The heat-shock protein/chaperone network and multiple stress resistance. Plant Biotech J. 2017; 15 (4): 405-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12659ff. ffhal-01602732f

Balbuena TS, Salas JJ, Martínez-Force E, Garcés R, Thelen JJ. Proteome analysis of cold acclimation in sunflower. J. Proteome Res. 2011 10(5): 2330-2346. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr101137q

Javidi MR, Maali-Amiri R, Poormazaheri H, Sadeghi Niaraki M, Kariman K. Cold stress-induced changes in metabolism of carbonyl compounds and membrane fatty acid composition in chickpea. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022; 192: 10-19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.09.031

Uemura M, Tominaga Y, Nakagawara C, Shigematsu S, Minami A, Kawamura Y. Responses of the plasma membrane to low temperatures. Physiol Plant. 2006; 126(1): 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00594.x

He M, Ding NZ. Plant unsaturated fatty acids: multiple roles in stress response. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 562785. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.562785

Ruelland E, Vaultier MN, Zachowski A, Hurry V. Cold signalling and cold acclimation in plants. Adv Bot Res. 2009; 49: 35-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(08)00602-2

Debaeke P, Casadebaig P, Langlade NB. New challenges for sunflower ideotyping in changing environments and more ecological cropping systems. OCL. 2021; 28(1): 29. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2021016

Alline C, Maury P, Sarrafi A, Grieu P. Genetic control of physiological traits associated to low temperature growth in sunflower under early sowing conditions. Plant Sci. 2009. 177(4): 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.07.002

Houmanat K, El Fechtali M, Mazouz H, Nabloussi A. Assessment of sunflower germplasm selected under autumn planting conditions. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Sunflower Conference; 29 May-3 June 2016. Edirne, Turkey, P. 286-293. [uploaded Sep 12 2016; cited 2023 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.isasunflower.org/fileadmin/documents/19thISCEDIRNE2016/Genetics_Breeding/Houmanat.pdf

Houmanat K, El Fechtali M, Mazouz H, Nabloussi A. Evaluation and selection of promising sunflower germplasm under early winter planting conditions. Afr J Agr Res. 2016; 11(45): 4610-4618. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11449

Downloads

Published

2023-12-27

Issue

Section

METHODS AND RESULTS SELECTION