Combining ability families S3 – S5 received on the basis of double sisterly hybrids geneticplasma iodent of maize

Authors

  • Б. В. Дзюбецький Agricultural Steppe Zone Institute of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Т. М. Бондарь Agricultural Steppe Zone Institute of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2014.42038

Keywords:

Geneticplasma Iodent, sisterly double hybrid, inbred family, combining ability

Abstract

In the article presents the results of research self-pollinated families S3 – S5 obtained on the basis of sisterly double corn hybrid geneticplasma Iodent conducted in contrasting weather conditions, respectively.

Results. It is known, that the yield of hybrids determines the prospects for their use in production. The main indicator of breeding values of lines is their combining ability and especially with respect to grain yields. In our research it varied significantly by patient testcrosses depending on the year.

Obtained testcrosses self-pollinated families had lower grain moisture and improved grain yield than the standards that indicate a high combining ability of the resulting material selection and effectiveness of the selection on this basis.

Conclusions. As a result of the evaluation and selection among families S3 – S5 selected genotypes with high and stable estimates TCA for grain yield and grain moisture content below the line than the standard. The best family testcrosses S5 exceeded standards for grain yield by 1,0 – 1,8 %, indicating the prospects of their use in practical breeding.

References

Dziubetskii BV, Cherchel VYu, Antoniuk SP. 2001. Maize breeding. In: Genetics and breeding in Ukraine at the border of millenniums. Kyiv: Logos. p. 571 – 589.

Zamkovoi GA, Suprunov AI. 2011. Breeding value of maize inbred lines on main economic traits. Kukuruza I sorgo 4:27 – 30.

Rojas BA, Sprague GF. 1952. A comparison of variance components in corn yield trails. III. General and specific combining ability and their interaction with location with location and years. Agron J 44:462 – 466.

Domashnev PP, Dziubetskii BV, Kostiuchenko VI. 1992. Maize breeding. Мoskva: Agropromizdat. 208 p.

Sotchenko VS. 1971. Evaluation of combining ability maize lines in topkross and crosses diallels. In: Breeding and seed production of maize. Moskva: Kolos. p. 298 – 303.

Khotileva LV, Tarutina LA. 1982. Interaction of genotype and environment. Evaluation methods. Minsk: Nauka I tekhika. 109 p.

Khotileva LV, Tarutina LA. 1973. Division of genotypic variansy on variansy of General and Specific combining ability and variansy their interaction with the environment. In: Methods of genetic and breeding and genetic experiments. Minsk: Nauka I tekhika. p. 37 – 47.

Tarutina LA, Polonetskaia LM, Kapusta IB. 1978. Study of combining ability maize lines variability depending on growing conditions. In: Genetics of crop productivity. Minsk: Nauka I tekhika. p. 139 – 145.

Kostiuchenko VI, Sokolov BP, Gontarovskii VA. 1976. Evaluation of General and Specific combining ability maize lines topkross. Vestnik selskokhoziaystvennoy nauki 1:31 – 37.

Gurieva IA, Riabchun VK, Kozubenko LV. 1993. Guidelines for field and laboratory studies of corn genetic recources. Kharkiv. 29 p.

Guidelines of experimens with maize. Dnepropetrovsk: VNII kukuruzi. 54 p.

Dremliuk GK, Gerasimenko VF. 1991. Combining ability analysis of the techniques of COMPUTER-programs for irregular crossings. Moskva: Agropromizdat. 144 p.

Published

2014-06-27

Issue

Section

METHODS AND RESULTS SELECTION