Stability of productivity elements in spring barley varieties under ecological testing

Authors

  • П. М. Солонечний Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • М. Р. Козаченко Plant Production Institute nd. a V. Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • Н. І. Васько Plant Production Institute nd. a V. Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. Г. Наумов Plant Production Institute nd. a V. Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • П. П. Дмитренко Donetsk Research Station of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. Л. Коваленко Research Station of Bast Crops of the Institute Agriculture North-East of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2014.42075

Keywords:

Spring barley, variety, ecological trial, adaptability, stability, plasticity, productivity element

Abstract

Purpose. To assess the adaptive capacity of spring barley varieties by productivity components and to identify the most valuable for breeding samples using ecological variety trials.

Material. The source material for the studies was 17 spring barley varieties bred by the Plant Production Institute nd. a V. Ya. Yuryev of NAAS. The ecological variety trials were carried out in three locations with different soil and climatic conditions - at the Plant Production Institute nd. a V. Ya. Yuryev of NAAS (the Eastern part of the Forest-Steppe), Donetsk Research Station of NAAS (the Northern Steppe) and the Research Station of Bast Crops of the Institute Agriculture North-East of NAAS (the North-Eastern Steppe). To estimate the environmental parameters and adaptive capacity and stability of genotypes the method by A. V. Kilchevskiy and L. V. Khotyleva was used. The ecological plasticity coefficient b1 was calculated according to the method by S. A. Eberhart and W. A. Russel.

Results. Peculiarities of the influence of factors and their interactions on the formation of separate productivity elements were determined by the analysis-of-variance method; concurrently strong significant differences between the effects of genotypes, environments, and their interactions were confirmed. The peculiarities of variety trial locations as backgrounds for assessing variety genotypes were defined. Thus, the destabilization effects for all the traits studied (productive tillering potential, the number of grains per ear, 1000-grain weight) were more evident under the conditions of the Research Station of Bast Crops of the Institute Agriculture North-East of NAAS and the compensation effects – under the conditions of the Plant Production Institute nd. a V. Ya. Yuryev of NAAS. The varieties with high overall adaptive capacity (OAC) characterizing the genotypes by their ability to provide the best manifestation of the trait in the totality of environmental conditions are of practical value for breeding; by the productive tillering potential these were the varieties Kosar (OAC 0.4 ), Agrariy (0.4), Kozvan (0.8); by the number of grains per ear - Agrariy (1.8), Kosar (1.9), Dyvoglyad (1.2), Schedryy (1.1), Modern (1.0); by 1000-grain weight - Vektor (4.2), Perl (3.2), Zdobutok (2.2), Schedryy (2.0). The degree of genotype stability was evaluated by the effect of specific adaptive capacity (SAC). The studies identified varieties with high overall adaptive capacity (OAC) and specific adaptive capacity (SAC) by each productivity element: by the productive tillering potential – the variety Kozvan, by the number of grains per ear – the awnless varieties Kosar and Dyvoglyad, by 1000-grain weight – the varieties Zdobutok and Schedryy..

Conclusions. The studies have confirmed the possibility of combining high productivity and high or medium stability in one genotype.

References

Solonechnii PM. 2013. Homeostaticity and breeding value of current spring barley varieties. Selektsia I nasinnitstvo. 103:31-36.

Solonechnii PM. 2013. Integral assessment of a degree of genetic protection of spring barley varietiesfrom hazardous organisms. Selektsia I nasinnitstvo. 104:32-39.

Solonechnii PM. 2013. Potential adaptive of the barley lines origin bred in Plant Production Institute nd. a V. Ya. Yuryev of NAAS. Visnik Center naukovogo zabezpechennia APV Kharkivskoyi oblasti. 15:119-126.

Nurminiemi M, Madsen S, Rongli OA, Bjornstad A, Ortiz R. 2002. Analysis of the genotype-by-environment interaction of spring barley tested in the Nordic Region of Europe: Relationships among statistics for grain yield. Euphytica. 127:123-132.

Lin CS, Binns MR, Lefkovitch LP. 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Science. 26:894-900.

Kadi Z, Adjel F, Bouzerzour H. 2010. Analysis of the genotype x environment interaction of barley grain yield (Hordeum vulgare L.) under semi-arid conditions. Advances in Environmental Biology. 4(1):34-40.

Saad FF, El-Mohsen AA, Al-Soudan IH. 2013. Parametric statistical methods for evaluating barley genotypes in multi-environment trials. World Essays Journal. 1(4):125-136.

Tondelli A, Francia E, Visioni A, Comadran J at all. 2014. QTLs for barley yield adaptation to Mediterranean environments in the Nure x Tremois biparental population. Euphytica. 197:73-86.

Araus JL, Slafer GA, Royo C, Serrent MD. 2008. Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 27(6):377-412.

Kilchevskii AV, Khotilyeva LV. 1997. Plant breeding ecological. Minsk: Tekhnologia. 372 p.

Zhuchenko AA. 1980. Genetic ecological of agricultural plants (adaptation, recombinigenesis, agribiocenose). Kishinev: Shtiintsa. 588 p.

Kilchevskii AV, Khotilyeva LV. 1989. Genotype and environment in plant breeding. Мoskva: Nauka I tekhnika. 191 p.

Eberhart SA, Russel WA. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci. 6(1):36–40.

Published

2014-06-27

Issue

Section

VARIETY STUDYING AND VARIETY SCIENCE