Effect of rhizobium biofertilizers on main characteristics and yield of soybean
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2016.74210Keywords:
soybean, rhizobium fertilizer, yieldAbstract
The aim and tasks of the study. New rhizobium biofertilizers from nodule bacteria will improve nitrogen fixation of soybean. Thus, they will enhance yield capacity, reduce the groundwater leaching of nitrogen and other nutrients in rivers, improving the ecological situation.
Materials and methods. Rhizobium biofertilizers GF5 and GF6 and soybean cultivar Heinong 46 were the test material. The experimental variants: application of rhizobium biofertilizers GF5 and GF6, control. Plant height, green plant weight, root nodule number per root, nodule weight were measured in 10 plants at the beginning of flowering, at the peak of flowering and at the seed filling stage for each experimental variant. Soybean seed yield was determined after ripening.
Results and discussion. The study found that rhizobium biofertilizer GF6 significantly increased the plant height, green plant weight, nodule number per root, and nodule weight as compared to the control. In particular, the plant height was improved by 1.0% at the beginning of flowering, by 3.0% at the peak of flowering, and by 3.5% at the seed filling phase. The green plant weight was improved by 12.7%, 4.2% and 21.2%, respectively; the nodule number - by 35.4%, 23.7% and 17.6%, respectively; the nodule weight – by 26.3%, 52, 6% and 62.8%, respectively.
Rhizobium biofertilizer GF5 did not improved performance at the initial stage of flowering. Some improvement was seen as compared the control at other phases, but it was smaller than that with rhizobium biofertilizer GF6. GF6 also more significantly affected the pod and seed numbers than GF5.
Conclusions. Rhizobium biofertilizer GF6 had more significant effects on all the parameters than GF5. Thus, nodules are more competitive, and the efficiency of nitrogen fixation is higher with GF6. This can significantly increase soybean yields.
References
Hoptsiy, TI. Amaranth: biology, cultivation, prospects of use, selection. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchayev; 1999. 272 p.
Klimenko YaV, Larchenko KA. Frequency of chromosome aberration of fall wheat, induced by mutagens at seeds and underground seedlings. Physiologya i biokhimiya kulturnykh rasteniy. 2006; 38(3): 222-227.
Larchenko YeA, Morgun VV. Comparative analysis of plants’ genetic variation at mutagenic processing of corn generative cells and seeds. Cytology and Genetics. 2000; 34(4): 16-20.
Morgun, VV. Autonomic and induced mutagenic variation and its application in plants selection. Genetics and selection in Ukraine at the turn of the millenniums. Кyiv: Logos; 2001. Vol. 2. P. 144–174.
Pausheva, ZP. Laboratory course in plant cytology. Мoscow: Nauka; 1980. 304 p.
Rokitskyi, PI. Biostatistics. Мoscow: Nauka; 1974. 232 p.
Teferi JV. Development of output materials for the selection of spring barley with separate and complex use of gamma rays and chemical mutagens [autoabstract]. [Kharkiv, Ukraine]: Plant Production Institute nd. a VYa Yuriev of NAAS; 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Jin Xiaomei, Lili Zhang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.