AMMI (additive main effect and multiplicative interaction) model for assessment of yield stability of spring barley genotypes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2016.87620Keywords:
AMMI, ASV, spring barley, genotype-environment interaction, yield capacity, stability, lineAbstract
The article presents results of AMMI analysis of yield capacity and phenotypic stability of 8 promising spring barley lines and 2 standard varieties. The study indentified genotypes that consistently fulfill their genetic potentials under contrastive hydrothermal conditions: lines 06-652 (G4) and 09-837 (G8). Line 09-837 named as ‘Lord’ was submitted to the state variety trial. Benefits of AMMI analysis for assessment of breeding material at the final stage of breeding are shownReferences
Cornelius PL, Crossa J, Seyedsadr MS. Statistical tests and estimators of multiplicative models for genotype-by-environment interaction. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG, eds. Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.1996.P. 199–34.
Annicchiarico P. Joint regression vs AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interactions for cereals in Italy. Euphytica. 1997;94: 53–62.
Moreno-González J, Crossa J, Cornelius PL. Genotype × environment interacion in multi-environment trials using shrinkage factors for AMMI models. Euphytica. 2004;137: 119–127.
Mortazavian SMM, Nikkhah HR, Hassani FA, Sharif-al-Hosseini M, Taheri M, Mahlooji M. GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of yield performance of barley genotypes across different environments in Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech.2014; 16: 609–622.
Kiliç H. Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) analysis of grain yield in barley genotypes across environments. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi – Journal of Agricultural Sciences.2014;20:337–344.
Mirosavljević M, Pržulj N, Čanak P. Analysis of new experimental barley genotype performance for grain yield using AMMI biplots. Selekcija i Semenarstvo.2014; XX(1): 27–36.
Solonechnyi P,Vasko N, Naumov O, Solonechna O, Vazhenina O, Bondareva OB, LogvinenkoYu. GGEbiplotanalysisofgenotypebyenvironmentinteractionofspringbarleyvarieties.Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 2015; 102(4):431–436.
Oliveira EJ, Freitas JPX, JesusON. AMMI analysis of the adaptability and yield stability of yellow passion fruit varieties. Sci. Agric. 2014; 71(2): 139–145.
Zobel RW, Wright AJ, Gauch HG. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal. 1988; 80: 388–393.
Crossa J, Gauch HG, Zobel RW. Additive main effects and multiplicative analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Science. 1990; 30: 493–500.
Gauch HG, Zobel RW. AMMI analysis of yield trials. Chap. 4. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG, eds. Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA,1996.P. 85–122.
Kempton RA. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. Journal of Agricultural Science. 1984; 103: 123–135.
Ferreira DF, Demétrio CGB, Manly BFJ, Machado AA, Vencovsky R. Statistical models in agriculture: biometrical methods for evaluating phenotypic stability in plant breeding. Cerne. 2006;12: 373–388.
Purchase JL, Hatting H, Vandeventer CS. Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: Π. Stability analysis of yield performance. South Afric J Plant Soil. 2000; 17: 101–107.
Babarmanzoor A, Tariq MS, Ghulam A, Muhammad A. Genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in Kabuli Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes developed through mutation breeding. Pak J Bot. 2009; 41 (4): 1883–1890.
Mohammadi R, Abdulahi A, Haghparast R, Armion M. Interpreting genotype- environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using non-parametric methods. Euphytica. 2007; 157: 239–251.
Mohammadi R, Amri A. Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments. Euphytica. 2008; 159: 419–432.
Eskridge KM. Selection of stable cultivars using a safety-first rule. Crop Sci. 1990; 30: 369–374.
Kang MS. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agron. J. 1993; 85:754–757.
Dashiell KE, Ariyo OJ, Bello L. Genotype x environment interaction and simultaneous selection for high yield and stability in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Men:). Ann Appl Biol. 1994; 124: 133–139.
Bajpai PK, Prabhakaran VT. A new procedure of simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Indian J Genet. 2000; 60: 141–146.
Rao AR, Prabhakaran VT. Use of AMMI in simultaneous selection of genotypes for yield and stability. Ind Soc Agril Statist. 2005; 59 (1): 76–82.
Farshadfar E. Incorporation of AMMI stability value and grain yield in a single non-parametric index (GSI) in bread wheat. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008; 11 (14): 1791–1796.
Singh P, Agarwal DK. Sustainability index as an aid for determining the genotypic stability in diploid cotton (Gossypium arboreum). J Cotton Res. 2003; 17: 90–92.
Gangwar B, Katyal V, Anand KV. Stability and efficiency of cropping systems in Chatisgarh and Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Agric Sci. 2004; 74: 521–528.
Tuteja OP. Comparative studies on stability parameters and sustainability index for selecting stable genotypes in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Indian J Genet. 2006; 66 (3): 221–224.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 M. P. Solonechnyi, M. R. Kozachenko, N. I. Vasko, O. G. Naumov, O. V. Solonechna, O. Ye. Vazhenina, K. V. Kompanets
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.
