Correlations between the protein content in grain with economic characters in winter bread wheat breeding accessions of hybrid origin on irrigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2022.271735Ключевые слова:
varieties, hybrids, wheat, irrigation, breeding, yield, protein content in grain, earlinessАннотация
Purpose and Objectives. To evaluate the expression of the "protein content in grain" trait in winter bread wheat lines derived from late-ripening accessions of the Western European ecotype; to construct correlation-regression models for the relationships of the protein content in grain with the "anthesis - grain ripeness" interphase period length and grain yield in elite accessions grown in breeding nurseries.
Material and Methods. The field studies were carried out at the Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of NAAS in 2019–2021. Modern winter wheat varieties bred at the Institute, collection specimens of the Western European ecotype, which had been introduced from France (registration numbers Kf1...16), and their hybrids were studied. Individual selections of elite plants from F2 were brought to the control nursery and evaluated for protein content in grain, yield, "anthesis - ripeness" period and other economic characteristics. Biometric measurements, biochemical analyses, and yield records were conducted by traditional methods. The study methods were field, laboratory, biochemical, breeding-genetic, and statistical. The studies were carried out under irrigation conditions at the pre-irrigation field moisture capacity (FMC) in the 0–50 cm soil layer of 75%.
Results and Discussion. The expression of the "protein content in grain" trait in the breeding accessions selected from hybrid populations, which had been originated from Western European ecotypes of winter bread wheat, was analyzed; the correlation-regression models of the relationships between the protein content in grain, the grain yield and the "anthesis - ripeness" period were constructed. The “anthesis – ripeness” period in the best accessions lasted 45 - 52 days, and each original hybrid combination had its own optimum, which was associated with a high yield and protein content in grain. Extension of the "anthesis - ripeness" period slightly increased the grain yields of the breeding accessions from some hybrid populations; however, analogous effect on the protein content in grain was insignificant.
Conclusions. A concurrent increase in the grain yield and protein content in grain through traditional selections is possible; however, such parallel enhancement of these traits is more suitable for heterogeneous hybrid populations with low protein contents grain and yields, or with low values of one of these traits (low protein content). For each hybrid population from parents contrasting in vegetation length, it is necessary to develop a specific plan of selections with due account for intra-population correlation-regression models of yield capacity, protein content in grain and “anthesis – ripeness” period length.
Библиографические ссылки
Koliuchyi VT. Winter wheat breeding for grain quality in the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Selektsiia i Nasinnytstvo. 2011; 100: 160–171. [in Ukrainian]
Hellemans T, Landschoot S, Dewitte K et al. Impact of crop husbandry practices and environmental conditions on wheat composition and quality: A review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2018; 66(11): 2491–2509. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05450
Lukyanenko PP. Breeding of new intensive winter wheat varieties. Vestnyk Selskokhozyaystvennoy Nauki. 1970; 4: 54–61. [in Russian]
Jurečka D. Overview of cereal varieties. Brno. 1998. 150 p.
Orliuk AP. Adaptive and productive potentials of wheat. Kherson: Naddniprianska Pravda. 2002. 272 p. [in Ukrainian]
Michel S, Ametz,C, Gungor H. et al. Genomic selection across multiple breeding cycles in applied bread wheat breeding. Theor Appl Genet. 2016; 129: 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2694-2
Marulanda JJ, Mi X, Melchinger AE et al. Optimum breeding strategies using genomic selection for hybrid breeding in wheat, maize, rye, barley, rice and triticale. Theor Appl Genet. 2016; 129: 1901–1913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2748-5
Akdemir D, Jannink JL, Isidro-Sánchez J. Locally epistatic models for genome-wide prediction and association by importance sampling. Genet Sel Evol. 2017; 49: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0348-8
Simmonds NW. The relation between yield and protein in cereal grain. J Sci Food Agric. 1995; 67: 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740670306
Gabriel D, Pftzner C, Haase N et al. New strategies for a reliable assessment of baking quality of wheat-rethinking thecurrent indicator protein content. J Cereal Sci. 2017; 77: 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.08.002
DePauw RM, Knox RE, Clarke FR et al. Shifting undesirable correlations. Euphytica. 2007; 157: 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9379-5
Ly D, Chenu K, Gaufreteau A et al. Nitrogen nutrition index predicted by a crop model improves the genomic prediction of grain number for a bread wheat core collection. F Crop Res. 2017; 214: 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.024
Monaghan JM, Snape JW, Chojecki JS, Kettlewell PS. The use of grain protein deviation for identifying with cultivars wuth high grain protein concentration and yield. Euphytica. 2001; 122: 309–317.
Hänsel H. Yield potential of barley corrected for disease infection by regression residuals. Plant Breed. 2001; 120: 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2001.00596.x
Arief VN, Lush D, Niu N et al. Genetic gain in yield and protein over two cycles of a wheat recurrent selection program. Breed Sci. 2010; 60: 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.60.181
Monaghan JM, Snape JW, Chojecki JS, Kettlewell PS. The use of grain protein deviation for identifying with cultivars wuth high grain protein concentration and yield. Euphytica. 2001; 122: 309–317.
Sallam AH, Smith KP. Genomic selection performs similarly to phenotypic selection in barley. Crop Sci. 2016; 56: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.09.0557.
Belamkar V, Guttieri MJ, Hussain W et al. Genomic selection in preliminary yield trials in a winter wheat breeding program. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2018; 8: 2735–2747. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200415
Fiedler JD, Salsman E, Liu Y et al. Genome-wide association and prediction of grain and semolina quality traits in durum wheat breeding populations. Plant Genome. 2017; 10: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2017.05.0038
Hayes BJ, Panozzo J, Walker CK et al. Accelerating wheat breeding for end-use quality with multi-trait genomic predictions incorporating near infrared and nuclear magnetic resonancederived phenotypes. Theor Appl Genet. 2017; 130: 2505–2519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2972-7
Laidig F, Piepho H.-P, Rentel D et al. Breeding progress, environmental variation and correlation of winter wheat yield and quality traits in German ofcial variety trials and on-farm during 1983–2014. Theor Appl Genet. 2017; 130: 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2810-3
Thorwarth P, Piepho HP, Zhao Y et al. Higher grain yield and higher grain protein deviation underline the potential of hybrid wheat for a sustainable agriculture. Plant Breed. 2018; 137: 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12588
Oury FX, Godin C. Yield and grain protein concentration in bread wheat: How to use the negative relationship between the two characters to identify favourable genotypes? Euphytica. 2007; 157: 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9395-5
Zhupyna AYu, Bazalii HH, Usyk LO et al. Inheritance of plant height by winter wheat hybrids of different ecological and genetic origins under irrigation conditions. Ahrarni Innovatsii. 2021; 10: 122–129. https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2021.10.19. [in Ukrainian]
Vozhehova RA et al. Methods of field and laboratory studies on irrigated lands. Kherson: Hrin D. S. 2014. 286 p. [in Ukrainian]
Bazalii VV. Principles of the adaptive breeding of winter wheat in the Southern Steppe: monograph. Kherson: Ailant. 2004. 244 p. [in Ukrainian]
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2023 R.A. Vozhehova , Yu.O. Lavrynenko, T.Yu. Marchenko, H.H. Bazalii, A.Yu. Zhupina, A.M. Sinhaievskyi, S.V. Mishchenko
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
При размещении текстов статей в электронных ресурсах авторские права сохраняются за автором печатной публикации.
Автор может не соглашаться с правками рецензентов и редакции, мотивируя при этом свою точку зрения.
Автор может требовать от редакции разъяснений или изменений в случае обнаружения существенных ошибок в его статье.
Автор может использовать материалы, опубликованные в журнале «Селекция и семеноводство» в своих работах, обязательно ссылаясь на наш журнал.