Development of psychological culture of students in the process of psychological training of future specialists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.116588Keywords:
psychological culture, personal development, professionally important features and properties, psychological trainingAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of components of the structure and personal determination of students’ psychological culture for elaborating psychological tendencies of formation and development of general and special professionally important components of the professional and personal development of future specialists.
The essential disadvantage of specialists’ training in HEIs is the managerial professional-psychological non-coordination of views and actions among staff and inconsistency to the key problem – students’ personal development in the aspect of tactic skills that essentially lowers the level and quality of psychological training.At the empiric research there were analyzed components of psychological culture of students’ personality in the subsystem of constitutional features, which scales choice is based on neurophysiologic theories, and in the psychosemantic substructure of a space of personal features.
Psychological culture is defined in the research as a culture of beliefs, feelings, ideas towards oneself and others and consists of gnoseological, procedural-active, subjective-personal components, the subjective-personal component of future specialists’ psychological culture is considered more detail.
For accelerating the students’ psychological culture development it is necessary to use active learning methods and special technologies (socio-psychological trainings) that favor the growth of the personal potential and professional effectiveness of future specialists in the education system
References
- Hluzman, O. V. (1995). Systemnyi analiz poniattia «tekhnolohiia navchannia u vuzi. Pedahohichna tekhnolohiia u suchasnomu vuzi. Lutsk.
- Kostiuk, H. S.; Prokoliienko, L. M. (Ed.) (1989). Navchalno-vykhovnyi protses i psykholohichnyi rozvytok osobystosti. Kyiv: Radianska shkola, 608.
- Aktualni problemy psykholohii. Vol. X. Ch. 1 (2007). Kyiv: Hlavnyk.
- Obozov, N. N. (1986). Psikhologicheskaya kul'tura vzaimnykh otnosheniy. Moscow: Znanie, 47.
- Motkov, O. I. (2007). Priroda lichnosti: sushhnost', struktura i razvitie. Moscow: GUP Voskresenskaya tipografiya, 248.
- Ribalka, V. V. (1998). Osobistіsniy pіdkhіd u profіl'nomu navchannі starshoklasnikіv. Kyiv: ІPPPO APN Ukraini, 160.
- Kolmogorova, L. S. (1997). Stanovlenie psikhologicheskoy kul'tury lichnosti kak orientir sovremennogo obrazovaniya. Pedagogika, 3, 55–69.
- Shmelev, A. G., Pokhil'ko, V. I., Kozlovskaya-Tel'nova, A. Yu. (1988). Praktikum po eksperimental'noy psikhosemantike. Tezaurus lichnostnykh chert. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MGU, 208.
- Semychenko, V. A. (2010). Problematyka osobystisnoho rozvytku v konteksti neperervnoi profesiinoi osvity. Pedahohika i psykholohiia, 2, 46–57.
- Bitinas, B. P. (1971). Mnogomernyy analiz v pedagogike i pedagogicheskoy psikhologii. Vilnius, 347.
- Abul'khanova-Slavskaya, K. A. (1981). Razvitie lichnosti v protsesse zhiznedeyatel'nosti. Psikhologiya formirovaniya i razvitiya lichnosti. Moscow, 19–44.
- Maksymenko, S. D., Ilina, T. B. (1999). Do problem rozrobky osvitno-kvalifikatsiinykh kharakterystyk suchasnoho psykholoha. Praktychna psykholohiia ta sotsialna robota, 1, 2–6.
- Antsiferova, L. I. (1982). Sistemnyy podkhod k izucheniyu funktsionirovaniya i razvitiya lichnosti. Problemy psikhologii lichnosti. Moscow: Nauka, 140–147.
- Sobchik, L. N. (1990). Metod tsvetovykh viborov. Modifitsirovannyy tsvetovoy test Lyushera. Moscow, 96.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Galina Коt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.