Anthropological turn in pedagogy: a theoretical-methodological research for the general value of human activities

Authors

  • Inna Dyachenko Communal Higher Educational Institution «Zhytomyr Medical Institute» Zhytomyr Regional Council Velyka Berdychivska str., 46/15, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 10002, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9047-671X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.155266

Keywords:

anthropological turn, man, life, living, homo vivens, goal, filomenological, potential

Abstract

The author of this idea argues that a person has a natural nature, which makes his/her life-supporting potential, which defines a person as a force that generates purposeful actions. An activity that is recognized as an innate potential was inherent in it. The goal is to ensure the greatest possible disclosure of opportunities for cooperation and the creation of conditions for its manifestation. Human is a living being, internally active, self-moving towards the goal: to be alive, to be active. Human must survive to reach his/her limit. The fuller the cognitive potential of a person, the more focused its use will be, the better the life of the person will be. Life exists for the sake of which a human exists. In order for him/her to live, he/she must realize his/her vital potential in its entirety. Value is a form of manifestation of the goal. What goals, such will be the values. The goal is life, the common value is formed in accordance with the goal, there will also be one - the desire / love for life (filomenological). The measure of awareness of the purpose of its existence and human activity, as well as the level of development of common values determines the nature of attitudes towards everything that he / she chooses, how he/she acts and the result of his/her activities. You must say that it was a love of life in general. Human has yet to learn to live among the living. Pedagogy receives a “foothold”, an invariant that allows it to respond adequately to the anthropological turn, according to which a person lives on the ruins of the old culture, and the new evolution cannot create, optimize the processes of modernization of education, upbringing of modern man and preservation of human society

Author Biography

Inna Dyachenko, Communal Higher Educational Institution «Zhytomyr Medical Institute» Zhytomyr Regional Council Velyka Berdychivska str., 46/15, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 10002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Natural and Social Sciences and Humanities

References

  1. Anosov, I. P., Elkin, M. V. (2013). Antropolohichnyi pidkhid do protsessu vykhovannia yak faktor harmoniinoho rozvytku osobystosti. Pedahohika formuvannia tvorchoi osobystosti u vyshchii i zahalnoosvitnii shkolakh, 29, 119–124.
  2. Firsova, A. E. (2013). Printsipy antropologicheskogo podkhoda v teorii i praktike sovremennogo obrazovaniya. Filosofiya obrazovaniya, 3 (48), 148–156.
  3. Asadullin, R. M., Teregulov, F. Sh. (2014). Predmet pedagogiki i pedagogicheskoy antropologii – chelovek. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie v Sibiri, 1 (13), 24–35.
  4. Ziaziun, I. A. (2008). Filosofiia pedahohichnoi antropolohii. Kształceniezawodowe: pedagogika i psychologia=Profesiinaosvita: pedahohika i psykholohiia, 10, 51–58.
  5. Cherepanova, L. G. (2010). Antropologiya kak metodologiya sovremennoy vospitatel'noy deyatel'nosti. Uchenye zapiski Zabaykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogicheskie nauki, 5, 171–175.
  6. Korol'kov, A. A., Preobrazhenskaya, K. V., Romanenko, I. B. (2017). Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya v zerkale filosofii. Saint Petersburg: Aleteyya, 176.
  7. Namakanov, B. A., Rasulov, M. M. (2011). Antropologicheskie aspekty i tekhnologii sovremennoy pedagogiki. Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal, 2, 61–70.
  8. Zinchenko, V. P., Morgunov, E. B. (1994). Chelovek razvivayushhiysya. Ocherki rossiyskoy psikhologii. Moscow: Trivola, 304.
  9. Deci, E. L, Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Rochester, New York: Plenum Press, 375. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  10. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68–78. doi: http://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
  11. Rieff, Ph. (1987). The triumph of the therapeutic. Uses of faith after Freud. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 274.
  12. Rudkevich, L. A. (2005). Epokhal'nye izmeneniya cheloveka na sovremennom etape i pedagogicheskie innovatsii. Vestnik prakticheskoy psikhologii obrazovaniya, 4 (5), 28–38.
  13. Shamne, A. V. (2014). Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie osobennosti sovremennogo otrochestva (po itogam provedeniya fokus-grupp s uchitelyami). Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 7 (35). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327386955_Socialno-psihologiceskie_osobennosti_sovremennogo_otrocestva_po_itogam_provedenia_fokus-grupp_s_ucitelami
  14. Zarembo, K. (Ed.) (2017). Rezultaty zahalnonatsionalnoho opytuvannia «Ukrainske pokolinnia Z»: tsinnosti ta oriientyry. Fond im. Fridrikha Eberta, 135. URL: http://neweurope.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Ukr_Generation_ukr_inet-1.pdf
  15. Tsymbalenko, S. B. (2013). Tsifrovye tekhnologii: novye tendentsii i vozmozhnosti. Sotsial'naya pedagogika, 6, 94–101.
  16. Howe, N., Strauss, W. (1991). Generations: TheHistoryofAmerica's Future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Harper Perennial, 558.
  17. Palfrey, J., Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books, 375.
  18. Petrushyna, T. O. (2017). Stan nauky v Ukraini (za otsinkamy vitchyznianykh ta zarubizhnykh ekspertiv). Visnyk Natsionalnoi Akademii Nauk Ukrainy, 11, 66–80.
  19. Smirnov, S. A. (2017). Antropologicheskiy povorot: ego smysl i uroki. Filosofiya i kul'tura, 2, 23–35.
  20. Molonov, G. Ts., Badmaev, V. M. (2010). Kharakteristika ponyatiya «Chelovek» s tochki zreniya pedagogiki. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya. Pedagogika. Filologiya. Filosofiya, 1, 25–27.
  21. Sattler, R. (1986). Biophilosophy. Analytic and Holistic Perspectives. NewYork, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg, 284. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71141-1
  22. Dridze, T. M. (2000). Ekoantropotsentricheskaya model' sotsial'nogo poznaniya kak put' k preodoleniyu paradigmal'nogo krizisa v sotsiologii. Sotsis, 2, 22.
  23. Waddington, C. H. (1957). The Strategy of the Genes: A Discussion of Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology. London: George Allen and Unwin, 340.
  24. Pankratov, A. V. (2003). Teleologiya i printsip neobratimosti. Voprosy filosofii, 8, 73–85.
  25. Akoff, R., Emeri, F. O. (1974). O tseleustremlennykh sistemakh: monografiya. Moscow: «Sovetskoe radio», 271.
  26. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38, 237–288.
  27. D’iachenko, I. M. (2012). Fenomen sub’iektyvnoi vitalnosti: teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady osmyslennia. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Filosofski nauky, 62, 17–25.
  28. D'yachenko, I. N. (2011). Filomenologichnost' – klyuchevoe ponyatie filosofskogo napravleniya «filomenologiya». Khanty-Mansiysk: Izdatel'stvo OAO «Informatsionno-izdatel'skiy tsentr», 42.
  29. Tikhonov, A. V. (2009). Sotsiologiya upravleniya. Teoreticheskie osnovy: monografiya. Moscow: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 145.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-29

How to Cite

Dyachenko, I. (2019). Anthropological turn in pedagogy: a theoretical-methodological research for the general value of human activities. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (1 (28), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.155266

Issue

No. 1 (28) (2019)

Section

Pedagogical Education

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Inna Dyachenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.