Experimental verification of the efficiency of the methodology of differentiated formation of english lexical competence in reading of future linguists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.160228Keywords:
lexical competence, differentiated approach, motivation, experiment, local, global and dark implicatorsAbstract
The article presents the results of the experimental verification of the effectiveness of the methodology of differentiated formation of English lexical competence in reading of future linguists, the planning, preparation and conduct of the experiment are described as well as the criteria and norms for evaluating lexical knowledge and receptive skills in reading; experimental verification of the effectiveness of author's methodology and developed methodological recommendations are also proved. The author's methodology is implemented in the model of the organization of the learning process, which covers the differentiation of learning objectives and expected results, teaching objects and subjects of training; learning elements; content, methods, forms of organization and control of students' educational activities. The micro-module is set as the minimum unit of the education organization. It comprises 6 hours of in-class work and 6 hours of independent work. It is thematic and covers about 100 new words, according to which the sentences, the phrasal unity, the texts are chosen, and the subsystem of exercises and tasks is organized. The model is synchronized: students perform the same type of work at the same time, but the content of the exercises and the nature of the tasks varies. It is found out that the effectiveness of the formation of English lexical competence in reading of future linguists is high, provided that differentiated groups are created according to the criterion of learning (low / sufficient / high); the objectives and expected learning outcomes for each differentiated group is given; provided that the content and nature of the exercises and tasks, the control over their implementation are monitored, and the adherence to the phases of the learning process is controlled. To assess students, the following criteria were taken: the correctness of understanding of the lexical unit, its denotative and connotative meaning in the speech; correctness of content communication establishing; degree of understanding of the implications and concepts in the text; extralinguistic information related to the lexical unit; degree of understanding of the content and meaning of the text; correctness and depth of search / analysis when solving lexicological tasks. We were able to trace the positive dynamics of the experimental group as a whole and each differentiated subgroup (depending on the initial level of learning) in particular. The reliability of the results of the experiment were proved by the Mann-Whitney method
References
- Shhoseva, E. P. (1991). Differentsirovannyy podkhod k obucheniyu monologicheskoy rechi na pervom etape neyazykovogo vuza. Moscow: Mosk. gos. lingvist. un-t., 23.
- Khamraeva, E. A. (1995). Differentsirovannyy podkhod v obuchenii studentov-filologov prakticheskoy grammatike nerodnogo yazyka. Moscow, 177.
- Chechik, I. V. (2005). Realizatsiya differentsirovannogo podkhoda k obucheniyu RKI s uchetom individual'no-psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik uchashhikhsya. Saint Petersburg: Ros. gos. ped. un-t im. A. I. Gertsena, 19.
- Gvozdeva, A. B. (2007). Bazovye kontseptual'nye polozheniya ingegrativno-differentsirovannogo podkhoda k obucheniyu. Innovatsii v nepreryvnom professional'nom obrazovanii konkurentosposobnykh kadrov. Kursk: Izd-vo KGU, 1, 99–103.
- Bondar, L. V. (2010). Metodychna kharakterystyka kompleksu vprav dlia navchannia frantsuzkoho profesiino oriientovanoho monolohichnoho movlennia studentiv tekhnichnykh spetsialnostei. Visnyk NTUU “KPI”. Filosofiia. Psykholohiia. Pedahohika, 3, 149–153.
- Krasheninnikova, N. N. (2014). Osobennosti differentsirovannogo formirovaniya inoyazychnoy uchebno-issledovatel'skoy kompetentsii magistrantov tekhnicheskikh vuzov. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 10-1 (40), 120–124.
- Sidorenko, E. V. (2000). Metody matematicheskoy obrabotki v psikhologii. Saint Petersburg: OO «Rech'», 350.
- Bukharova, G. D. (2012). Opytno-poiskovaya, opytno-eksperimental'naya rabota i pedagogicheskiy eksperiment v dissertatsionnykh issledovaniyakh. Nauchnye issledovaniya v obrazovanii, 11. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/opytno-poiskovaya-opytno-eksperimentalnaya-rabota-i-pedagogicheskiy-eksperiment-v-dissertatsionnyh-issledovaniyah
- Lyakhovitskiy, M. V. (2012). O sushhnosti i spetsifike eksperimental'nogo issledovaniya v metodike obucheniya inostrannomu yaziku. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole. Zolotye stranitsy, 8, 3–10.
- Seregin, N. V. (2012). Nauchnaya problematika, gipoteza i kriterii uspeshnosti teoreticheskoy osnovy pedagogicheskogo issledovaniya. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya, 1, 147–149.
- Patiievych, O. V. (2015). Metodychni rekomendatsii shchodo navchannia stylistychno unormovanoho naukovoho pysemnoho movlennia studentiv-mahistrantiv pryrodnychykh fakultetiv. Suchasna pedahohika: teoriia, metodyka, praktyka, 62–67. Available at: http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/conf/ped/11oct2015/11oct2015.pdf
- Solomko, Z. K. (2013). Eksperymentalna perevirka efektyvnosti metodyky formuvannia ta udoskonalennia retseptyvnoi leksychnoi kompetentsii maibutnikh yurystiv u samostiinii roboti. Visnyk Chernihivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky, 111, 294–302. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VchdpuP_2013_111_73
- Smolina, S. V. (2010). Metodyka formuvannia inshomovnoi leksychnoi kompetentsii. Inozemni movy, 4, 16–23.
- Kotlovskyi, A. M. (2017). Formuvannia anhlomovnoi leksyko-hramatychnoi kompetentnosti v hovorinni maibutnikh ekonomistiv u protsesi samostiinoi roboty. Ternopil, 253.
- Biretska, L. S. (2014). Orhanizatsiia eksperymentalnoi perevirky efektyvnosti metodyky formuvannia anhlomovnoi leksychnoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh likariv u protsesi profesiino oriientovanoho chytannia. Teoretychni pytannia kultury, osvity ta vykhovannia, 50, 110–116. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Tpkov_2014_50_30
- Shostak, Y. Y. (2011). Formyrovanye leksycheskoi kompetentsyy pry obuchenyy ynostrannomu yaziku. Naukovyi visnyk Pivdennoukrainskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni K. D. Ushynskoho. Odessa, 244–248.
- Siaska, N. V. (2013). Efektyvnist formuvannia anhlomovnoi leksychnoi kompetentnosti u maibutnikh uchyteliv zasobamy avtentychnykh poetychnykh tekstiv. Problemy suchasnoi pedahohichnoi osvity. Pedahohika i psykholohiia, 39 (4), 259–264. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/pspo_2013_39%284%29__42
- Seidenberg, M. S. (2013). The Science of Reading and Its Educational Implications. Language Learning and Development, 9 (4), 331–360. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2013.812017
- Berens, M. S., Kovelman, I., Petitto, L.-A. (2013). Should Bilingual Children Learn Reading in Two Languages at the Same Time or in Sequence? Bilingual Research Journal, 36 (1), 35–60. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2013.779618
- Dilkina, K., McClelland, J. L., Plaut, D. C. (2010). Are there mental lexicons? The role of semantics in lexical decision. Brain Research, 1365, 66–81. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.057
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Andrii Kravchenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.