Anomalies of schoolchildren’s educational activities and ways of their surmounting

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2020.199393

Keywords:

consequences of abnormal educational overload in schoolchildren, morbidity, academic failure, delinquency, standardizing of educational process

Abstract

The deep historical roots of the problems in schoolchildren’s educational activity normalizing and educational overloads elimination, as well as standpoints of outstanding teachers of the past in these problems are revealed. On the basis of the modern pedagogical, medical-hygienic and criminological studies analysis, the long chain of dangerous consequences of the abnormal educational overload in schoolchildren is determined. The consequences of anomalies include: the loss of teachers' ability to implement the principle of training accessibility and other didactic principles; loss of students' desire to learn; mechanical learning of an educational material, which can even lead to torpidity; compulsory nature of pupils' learning activity and the authoritarianism of teachers, caused by it; zero (failure) level of mastering mathematics, physics, chemistry and other subjects; dramatically high morbidity of schoolchildren; lack of discipline, pedagogically neglected children, which in turn becomes the cause of juvenile delinquency and so on. The necessity and possibility of overloads elimination and normalizing the educational activity of schoolchildren at the government level is substantiated. Significant reserves have been considered for a practical solution to these problems, related to the domestic experience of the 1920s in the development of tightly scheduled curricula and manuals for trainees, with the current experience in reforming the content of education in Singapore. In this context, there is also evidence that in Ukraine in the 60-80's of the twentieth century the path to the standardized training implementation was laid by school pedagogical teams, headed by V.O. Sukhomlinsky and G.Ye. Hlushchenko. The article also identifies the priority measures for practical implementation of standardized educational activities of schoolchildren

Author Biographies

Valery Lutfullin, Poltava National V. G. Korolenko Pedagogical University Ostrohradskoho str., 2, Poltava, Ukraine, 36000

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of General Education and Andragogics

Maxim Lutfullin, Poltava V. G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University Ostrohradskoho str., 2, Poltava, Ukraine, 36000

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of General Physics and Mathematics

Sergey Pilipenko, Poltava V. G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University Ostrohradskoho str., 2, Poltava, Ukraine, 36000

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Biology and Fundamentals of Human Health

Andrei Khlopov, Poltava V. G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University Ostrohradskoho str., 2, Poltava, Ukraine, 36000

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Production and Information Technologies and Life Safety

References

  1. Kvintilian, M. F. (1971). O vospitanii oratora. Khrestomatija po istorii zarubezhnoi pedagogiki. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 40–46.
  2. Komenskii, Ia. A.; Piskunov, A. I. (Ed.) (1982). Velikaia didaktika. Izbrannye pedagogicheskie sochineniia. Vol. 1. Moscow: Pedagogika, 242–476.
  3. Grombakh, S. M. (1988). Rol shkoly v formirovanii psikhicheskogo zdorovia uchashchikhsia. Shkola i psikhicheskoe zdorove uchashchikhsia. Moscow: Meditsina, 9–32.
  4. Vsesviatskii, B. V. (1996). Problemy didaktiki biologii. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 240.
  5. Nauka i uchebnyi predmet (1965). Sovetskaia pedagogika, 7, 3–25.
  6. Tkhorzhevskyi, D. O. (1999). Derzhavnyi standart zahalnoi serednoi osvity i dyferentsiatsiia zmistu navchannia. Pedahohika i psykholohiia, 4, 47–51.
  7. Bespalko, V. P. (1988). Teoriia uchebnika: Didakticheskii aspekt. Moscow: Pedagogіka, 160.
  8. Stepanenko, M., Lutfullin, V. (2018). Normy y anomalii navchalnoi diialnosti shkoliariv. Vytoky pedahohichnoi maisternosti. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats PNPU im V. H. Korolenka. Seriia "Pedahohichni nauky", 21, 5–9.
  9. Yarmachenko, M. D. (1978). Aktualni pytannia pedahohichnoi nauky. Kyiv: Znannia, 48.
  10. Lutfullin, V. S. (2011). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady usunennia navchalnykh perevantazhen uchniv. Poltava: Vydavets Shevchenko R. V., 336.
  11. Lutfullin, V., Inozemtsev, V., Pilipenko, S. (2017). Regulation of training activities as a key of health protection of pupils and students. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 5 (13), 22–27.doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.102784
  12. Cuthbert, M. (2017). Curriculum overload and its impact on teasher effectiveness in primare schools. European Journal of Education Studies, 3 (3), 155–162. doi: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.290597
  13. The overcrowded primary curriculum: a way forward 2014. Available at: https://www.appa.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Overcrowded-primary-curriculum.pdf
  14. Dubovicki, S., Munjiza, E., Peko, A. (2016). Paradox of student (over)load in elementary school. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299534217
  15. Stenger, M. (2018). Don’t Overload Students: Assigning Too Much Work Discourages Learning. Available at: https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/dont-overload-students-assigning-too-much-work-discourages-learning/
  16. Odinaka, I. (2012). How Information Overload is Affecting Our Learning. 2012. Available at: https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/other/how-information-overload-is-affecting-our-learning/
  17. Ojo, O. J. (2016). Information Anxiety and Information Overload of Undergraduates in Two Universities in South-West Nigeria. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3760&context=libphilprac
  18. Kovaleva, H. (2003). Prychyni padenyia mezhdunarodnoho reitynha rossyiskoho obrazovanyia. Daidzhest pedahohichnykh idei i tekhnolohii, 2, 23–25.
  19. Wilson, R. (2011). Minimizing Academic Overload. Available at: https://www.brightmontacademy.com/blog/minimizing-academic-overload
  20. Kievskie matematiki-pedagogi (1979). Kyiv: Vishcha shkola, 312.
  21. Cukhomlynskyi, V. O. (1977). Vybrani tvory. Vol. 4. Kyiv: Rad. shkola, 640.
  22. Ostroverkhova, N., Vinnik, A. (1982). Kogda pedsovet uchit tvorchestvu. Narodnoe obrazovanie, 4, 73–75.
  23. Disterveg, A. (1971). Rukovodstvo k obrazovaniiu nemetskikh uchitelei. Khrestomatiia po istorii zarubezhnoi pedagogiki. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 385–444.
  24. Orzhekhovska, V. M. (1996). Profilaktyka pravoporushen sered nepovnolitnikh. Kyiv: ViAn, 352.
  25. Onyshchenko, N. (2002). Kryterii sformovanosti deviantnoi povedinky v molodshykh shkoliariv. Ridna shkola, 7, 26–27.
  26. Zubkova, V. M.; Grombakh, S. M. (Ed.) (1988). Gigienicheskie kriterii adaptatsii detei k shkole i faktory ee opredeliaiushchie. Shkola i psikhicheskoe zdorove uchashchikhsia. Moscow: Meditsina, 43–53.
  27. Pantik V. V. Struktura zakhvoriuvanosti studentiv Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky. Achievement of high school-2016. Vol. 8. Psykholohyia y sotsyolohyia. Fyzycheskata kultura y sporta. Sofyia: «Bial HRAD-BH» OOD – 72, 67–70.
  28. Achkan, V. (2016). Innovatsii u shkilnii matematychnii osviti v zarubizhnykh krainakh. Matematyka v ridnii shkoli, 6, 39–44.
  29. Kupisevich, Ch. (1986). Osnovy obshchei didaktiki. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 368.

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Lutfullin, V., Lutfullin, M., Pilipenko, S., & Khlopov, A. (2020). Anomalies of schoolchildren’s educational activities and ways of their surmounting. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (2 (35), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2020.199393

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education