Discovering significant peculiarities of pedagogical conflict: theoretical aspect

Authors

  • Ganna Polishchuk State Higher Educational Institution «Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University» Shevchenko str., 1, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine, 25006, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9547-4959

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2020.213243

Keywords:

conflict, pedagogical conflict, conflict situations, typology of conflicts, conflictological competence, regulation of relationships.

Abstract

The article deals with the generalization of the points of view of scientists on the essence of the notions “conflict”, ”pedagogical conflict” depending on their scientific approach for investigation. The integrative approach to the definition of these notions that unites into a single whole several other approaches (situational, personal, and motivational) was analyzed. Different approaches of scientists were examined as for the typology of conflicts. It has been estimated, that in the scope of pedagogy different classifications of conflicts are available where the content, importance, the sphere, duration of conflicts, direction, character of appearance, the structure of relationships, consequences, functions, socio-psychological effects, social results are taken into consideration. It is assumed, that the notion of pedagogical conflict includes different forms and methods of contradiction, tension in relations, explicit and hidden struggle. The functions of pedagogical conflicts in regulating interpersonal and intergroup relations were focused on (positive, negative); the reasons of pedagogical conflicts in high educational establishments (socio-economic, socio-psychological, psychological, organizational-pedagogical); the direction of the development of conflictological competence of a teacher (age and individual peculiarities of pupils, self-control of teacher’s behavior, the knowledge of pupils’ psychology and modern methods of teaching and upbringing of pupils).

Author Biography

Ganna Polishchuk, State Higher Educational Institution «Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University» Shevchenko str., 1, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine, 25006

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of English Language and its Teaching Methods

References

  1. Soroka, I. A. (2015). Psykholohichna profilaktyka konfliktiv u pedahohichnomu kolektyvi vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu. Kyiv, 256.
  2. Kozych, I. V. (2009). Formuvannia konfliktolohichnoi kompetentnosti starshoklasnykiv. Naukova skarbnytsia osvity Donechchyny, 1 (4), 66–69.
  3. Plakhotna, S. (2014). Konfliktolohichna kompetentnist yak zasib zasvoiennia pozytsii spivrobitnytstva u protsesi vzaiemodii «uchytel-uchni». Problemy pidhotovky suchasnoho vchytelia, 10 (3), 179–183.
  4. Aleksandrova, L. Iu., Munshi, A. Iu. (2009). K voprosu o konfliktologicheskoi kompetentnosti spetsialistov. Vestnik CHeboksarskogo kooperativnogo instituta, 1, 180–185.
  5. Thomas, K. W. (2002). Introduction to Conflict Management. CPP, 44. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-conflict-management-Improving-performance/dp/B0006RZL4C
  6. Runde, C. E., Flangan, T. A. (2006). Becoming a Conflict Competent Leader: How You and Your Organization Can Manage Conflict Effectively. Jossey-Bass.
  7. Thomas, K. W., Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. New York: Tuxedo, 16. Available at: https://www.worldcat.org/title/thomas-kilmann-conflict-mode-instrument/oclc/27376637
  8. Branitska, T. R. (2013). Formuvannia konfliktolohichnoi kultury maibutnikh fakhivtsiv sotsionomichnoi sfery v Rosii. Teoriia i praktyka upravlinnia sotsialnymy systemamy, 4, 24–30.
  9. Antonov, H. V. (2006). Pedahohichni zasady zapobihannia i rozviazannia konfliktiv u navchalno-vykhovnomu seredovyshchi vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu. Kharkiv, 22.
  10. Trukhan, M. A. (2016). Formuvannia hotovnosti maibutnikh sotsialnykh pedahohiv do diialnosti z rozviazannia profesiinykh konfliktiv u zakladakh osvity. Khmelnytskyi, 266.
  11. Hlazkova, I. Ya. (2015). Stratehiia zapobihannia konfliktam subiektiv navchalnoho protsesu VNZ. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho un-tu imeni Alfreda Nobelia. Seriia: «Pedahohika i psykholohiia». Pedahohichni nauky, 1 (9), 210–215.
  12. Karmina, A. S. (Ed.) (1999). Konfliktologiia. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelstvo «Lan», 448.
  13. Bashkin, M. V. (2014). Konfliktnaia kompetentnost. Iaroslavl: IArGU, 72.
  14. Hirnyk, A. M. (2010). Osnovy konfliktolohii. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia», 222.
  15. Volkova, N. P. (2006). Profesiino-pedahohichna komunikatsiia. Kyiv: VTs «Akademiia», 256.
  16. Golovanova, I. I. (2011). Metodika upravleniia konfliktami. Kazan: TSentr innovatsionnykh tekhnologii, 79.
  17. Krishbaum, E. I. (1986). Psikhologo-pedagogicheskii analiz konfliktnykh situatsii v pedagogicheskom protsesse. Leningrad, 252.
  18. Pidbutska, N. V. (2010). Osoblyvosti konfliktiv u navchalno-vykhovnomu protsesi vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv. Naukovyi visnyk MDU imeni V. O. Sukhomlynskoho. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky, 1 (31), 143–150.
  19. Nikulina, I. V. (2016). Fenomenologiia pedagogicheskikh konfliktov. Vestnik Samarskogo un-ta. Serіia: Istoriia, pedagogika, filosofiia, 82–86.
  20. Podoliak, L. H., Yurchenko, V. I. (2006). Psykholohiia vyshchoi shkoly. Kyiv: TOV «Fil-studiia», 320.
  21. Bilenka, O. B., Chaikivskyi, T. V. (2013). Sotsialno-pedahohichni konflikty u vyshchomu navchalnomu zakladi – prychyny vynyknennia ta shliakhy rozviazannia. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 23 (12), 385–389.
  22. Dolinska, L. V., Matiash-Zaiats, L. P. (2010). Psikhologіia konflіktu. Kyiv: Karavela, 304.
  23. Borisova, E. S. (2017). Problema konfliktologicheskoi kompetentnosti v prostranstve obscheobrazovatelnoi organizatsii. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia: Sotsialnye, gumanitarnye, mediko-biologicheskie nauki, 2 (19), 28–32.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Polishchuk, G. (2020). Discovering significant peculiarities of pedagogical conflict: theoretical aspect. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (5 (38), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2020.213243

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education