Interference factors of teacher development in the Magelang district, Indonesia

Фактори, що заважають розвитку вчителя в окрузі Магеланг, Індонезія




inhibitors, promotion, rank, teacher


This study aims to analyze the factors inhibiting the promotion of teachers in Candimulyo sub-district, Magelang regency. The research approach used is quantitative methods. Respondents who participated in this study were 116 people. The analysis used is multiple regression test. The results showed that the age factor has a probability of 0.000 and the convenience factor (comfort) has a probability of 0.036 and has a significant effect on the difficulty in advancing according to the respondents in this study. Meanwhile, the factors of regulation, motivation, and education do not significantly influence the difficulty of promotion for teachers.

Author Biographies

Firstia Mayesthi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Udik Budi Wibowo, Yogyakarta State University Jl. Colombo Yogyakarta No. 1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia


Sugeng Widarso, Academy of Management and administration Dharmala of Yogyakarta Jl. Pramuka No.70, Giwangan, Kec. Umbulharjo, Kota Yogyakarta, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55161, Indonesia



  1. Bank, A. D. (2017). Innovative strategies for accelerated human resource innovative strategies for accelerated human resource development in South Asia: teacher professional development. doi:
  2. Wong, P.-M., Wong, C.-S. (2005). Promotion Criteria and Satisfaction of School Teachers in Hong Kong. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33 (4), 423–447. doi:
  3. Seprini, Hadi, A. (2014). Dampak mutasi dan promosi terhadap prestasi kerja guru SMA Negeri 2 Rambah Hilir. Jurnal Ilmiah Cano Ekonomos, 3 (2), 99–116.
  4. Background, C., For, R. (2003). Attracting , developing and retaining effective teachers. Country background report for Finland. Available at:
  5. Azmi, I. A. G., Ismail, S. H. S., Basir, S. A. (2012). Women Career Advancement in Public Service: A Study in Indonesia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 298–306. doi:
  6. Askell-williams, H., Cefai, C. (2014). Australian and Maltese teachers’ perspectives about their capabilities for mental health promotion in school settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 61–72. doi:
  7. Chingos, M. M., West, M. R. (2011). Promotion and reassignment in public school districts: How do schools respond to differences in teacher effectiveness? Economics of Education Review, 30 (3), 419–433. doi:
  8. Bernadus Beda Keda (2018). Sertifikat Pendidikan Memberatkan Kenaikan Pangkat Guru.
  9. Jourdan, D., Samdal, O., Diagne, F., Carvalho, G. S. (2008). The future of health promotion in schools goes through the strengthening of teacher training at a global level. Promotion & Education, 15 (3), 36–38. doi:
  10. Galvin, C. (2006). A promotion of teacher professionality: Higher education and initial teacher education in England and Wales. Studies in Higher Education, 21 (1), 81–92. doi:
  11. Teacher status in Finland (2016). Available at:
  12. Cilliers, J., Kasirye, I., Leaver, C., Serneels, P., Zeitlin, A. (2018). Pay for locally monitored performance? A welfare analysis for teacher attendance in Ugandan primary schools. Journal of Public Economics, 167, 69–90. doi:
  13. Paronen, P., Lappi, O. (2018). Finnish teachers and principals in figures. Available at:
  14. Ravago, M.-L. V., Mapa, C. D. S. (2020). Awards and recognition: Do they matter in teachers’ income trajectory? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100901. doi:
  15. Tigchelaar, A., Brouwer, N., Vermunt, J. D. (2010). Tailor-made: Towards a pedagogy for educating second-career teachers. Educational Research Review, 5 (2), 164–183. doi:
  16. Syafruddin. PermenpanRB Nomor 13 Tahun 2019 (2019). Pub. L., 13, 93.
  17. Wong, P.-M. (2009). Teachers and Promotion: Research Evidence on the Role of Gender, Career Intentions, Promotion Criteria and Teacher Satisfaction. International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching, 511–523. doi:
  18. Cirocki, A., Farrell, T. S. C. (2019). Professional development of secondary school EFL teachers: Voices from Indonesia. System, 85, 102111. doi:
  19. Mangindaan, E. E. (2009). Jabatan Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya. Pub. L.,16, 2 255.
  20. Mangindaan, E. E. (2010). Peraturan bersama no 14 tahun 2010.pdf. Pub. L., 03/V/PB/2010.
  21. Marent, S., Deketelaere, A., Jokikokko, K., Vanderlinde, R., Kelchtermans, G. (2020). Short interims, long impact? a follow-up study on early career. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102962. doi:
  22. Dumitriu, C., Dumitriu, G., Timofti, I. C. (2014). Teachers’ Professional Development and Career Advancement. Limitations of the Current Model of Professional Competences Assessment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 864–868. doi:
  23. Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (1), 116–126. doi:
  24. Smith, B. J., Potts-Datema, W., Nolte, A. E. (2005). Challenges in teacher for school health education and promotion. Promotion & Education, 12 (3-4), 162–164. doi:
  25. Ahmed, A. Y., Mihiretie, D. M. (2015). Primary school teachers and parents’ views on automatic promotion practices and its implications for education quality. International Journal of Educational Development, 43, 90–99. doi:
  26. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22 (140), 55.




How to Cite

Mayesthi, F., Wibowo, U. B., & Widarso, S. (2021). Interference factors of teacher development in the Magelang district, Indonesia: Фактори, що заважають розвитку вчителя в окрузі Магеланг, Індонезія. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (1(40), 4–8.



Pedagogical Education