Methods and means of developing the pedagogical skill of teachers of general education disciplines in vocational education institutions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2024.298508

Keywords:

pedagogical skill, vocational education, general education, methods, means, techniques, teacher

Abstract

The problem of developing the professionalism of teachers today belongs to the key directions of research in the field of modern pedagogical science. The high quality of teaching in the vocational education system depends on the level of knowledge, pedagogical skill of the teacher, and his/her professional maturity. On the basis of the conducted analysis, it is substantiated that the effectiveness of the development of the pedagogical skill of teachers of general education disciplines of vocational education institutions depends both on the correct definition of goals and content, and on the methods of achieving the goal - teaching methods.

The purpose of the article is the theoretical justification of the main methods and means of developing the pedagogical skill of teachers of general education disciplines of vocational education institutions.

The work characterizes the main functions of teaching methods, analyzes their main classifications, examines familiar, traditional methods (lecture method, story, explanation, training exercises, explanatory conversation, discussion, independent work, instruction, etc.), as well as innovative: simulation and game methods, brainstorming method, problem methods, project method, case method, master class, work in pairs, work in groups, consultations, portfolio, method of situational analysis, coaching, tutoring, etc.

The study revealed that improving the professional skill of teachers of general education disciplines in vocational education institutions is a complex process. The professional skill of a teacher is an individual style, combined with high professional competence, which determines the ability to apply traditional and innovative technologies, to carry out professional activities regardless of the conditions of the social environment and the characteristics of students. That is why explanatory-illustrative, reproductive, and problem-based teaching methods (traditional and innovative) should gradually and purposefully implement cognitive activity, develop and improve professional skills within the framework of formal, non-formal, and informal continuous pedagogical education of teachers of general education disciplines of vocational education institutions

Author Biography

Мaryna Kаbysh, Oleksandr Dovzhenko Hlukhiv National Pedagogical University

PhD

Department of Ukrainian Language, Literature and Teaching Methods

References

  1. Honcharenko, S. U. (2012). Pedahohichni zakony, zakonomirnosti, pryntsypy. Suchasne tlumachennia. Rivne: Volynski oberehy, 192.
  2. Kabysh, M. (2021). The essence and structure of the pedagogical skills of the teacher of general educational disciplines of the institution of vocational education. Professional Pedagogics, 2 (23), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.32835/2707-3092.2021.23.108-118
  3. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. E., Swanson, R. A. (2005). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. London; New York : ELSEVIER Butterworth Heinemann.
  4. Jones, F. H., Jones, P., Lynn, J., Jone, F., Jones, B. T. (2007). Tools for Teaching: Discipline, Instruction, Motivation with Patrick Jones. Fredric H. Jones & Associates.
  5. Lemov, D. (2012). Teach Like a Champion: 49 Techniques That Put Students on the Path to College. Your Coach in A Box.
  6. Teodoro, V., Mesquita, M. (2014). ModellingSpace. Space of ideas' expression, modelling and collaboration for the development of imagination, reasoning and learning. Development of Pedagogical Methodology. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia (UNL).
  7. İnönü, G. N., Demircan, H. Ö. (2023). Questioning as an instructional method: Exploring beliefs and reported practices of early childhood educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104351
  8. Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20 (5), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.003
  9. Vescio, V., Ross, D., Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
  10. Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20 (6), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001
  11. Harris, A., Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools, 13 (2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480210376487
  12. Dolfing, R., Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M. W., Pilot, A., Vermunt, J. D. (2020). Strategies to support teachers’ professional development regarding sense‐making in context‐based science curricula. Science Education, 105 (1), 127–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21603
  13. Schiering, D., Sorge, S., Keller, M. M., Neumann, K. (2023). A proficiency model for pre-service physics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). What constitutes high-level PCK? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60 (1), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21793
  14. George, J. M., Lubben, F. (2002). Facilitating teachers’ professional growth through their involvement in creating context-based materials in science. International Journal of Educational Development, 22 (6), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-0593(01)00033-5
  15. Pieters, J., Voogt, J., Roblin, N. P. (Eds.) (2019). Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6
  16. Tsilmak, O. M. (2017). Pedahohichna kompetentnist vykladacha vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu. Odesa: ODUVS, 124.
  17. Bondar, V. I. (2005). Dydaktyka. Kyiv: Lybid, 264.
  18. Luzan, P. H. (2003). Metody i formy orhanizatsii navchannia u vyshchii ahrarnii shkoli. Kyiv: Ahrarna osvita, 224.
  19. Domin, O. A. (2021). Teoretychni i metodychni osnovy profesiinoi pidhotovky bakalavriv iz ahroinzhenerii. Instytut profesiino-tekhnichnoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy.
  20. Kononenko, A. V., Liubchak, Yu. S. (2017). Tradytsiini ta innovatsiini metody vykladannia v systemi ukrainskoi osvity: perspektyvy, rezultatyvnist, nedoliky. Vinnytsia, 28. Available at: http://inmad.vntu.edu.ua/portal/static/99950E9A-497C-4E05-9BE8-2C025F32AFFF.pdf
  21. Bahrii, K. L. (2016). Visibility in teaching and its importance in educational process. Educational problems and the methods of teaching in higher educational establishments, 1 (61), 260–268.
  22. Koshuk, O. B. (2018). Formuvannia profesiinoi kompetentnosti maibutnikh fakhivtsiv iz ahroinzhenerii: teoriia i metodyka. Kyiv: Komprynt.

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Kаbysh М. (2024). Methods and means of developing the pedagogical skill of teachers of general education disciplines in vocational education institutions. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (1 (58), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2024.298508

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education