Taking into account the educational needs of students in an inclusive environment: the role of differentiated teaching

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2025.339117

Keywords:

inclusive pedagogical approach, differentiated teaching, universal design in education, differentiation of learning content, differentiation of the learning process, differentiation of learning outcomes

Abstract

The article analyzes two key inclusive pedagogical approaches—universal design for learning (UDL) and differentiated instruction—in the context of creating an accessible and effective educational environment for all students. UDL is defined as a technology for pre-designing content, methods, and means of teaching, taking into account the diversity of students and potential barriers, which ensures the achievement of common learning goals in different ways. Differentiated instruction is characterized as an approach that involves adapting not only the forms and methods of instruction, but also the goals themselves to the individual needs, readiness, and abilities of students. It is emphasized that in differentiated instruction, results may vary for each student, but are always focused on maximum personal progress. It is noted that both approaches are complementary tools of inclusive education, which, when used in combination, enhance the engagement, motivation, and success of all students, including those with special educational needs. In this context, the study pays particular attention to the theoretical foundations of differentiated teaching as one of the effective inclusive pedagogical approaches that ensures the organization of the educational process taking into account the level of preparedness, interests, cognitive styles, and special educational needs of students. The article analyzes the approaches of foreign and Ukrainian scientists to understanding the differentiation of content, process, and product of learning, identifies the key ideas that characterize each of these areas, and outlines the possibilities for their use to improve the effectiveness of learning, engage students in active interaction, and create conditions that will contribute to the formation of an active position of students and ensure that they achieve specific educational goals

Author Biographies

Olena Martynchuk, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Мetropolitan University

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor

Department of Special and Inclusive Education

Tetiana Skrypnyk, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Мetropolitan University

Doctor of Pedagogical Science, Professor

Department of Special and Inclusive Education

Julia Naida, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Мetropolitan University

Department of Special and Inclusive Education

References

  1. Loreman, T. (2017). Pedagogy for Inclusive Education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.148
  2. Martynchuk, O. (2019). Inclusive pedagogy as a scientific factor of development of competence in the field of inclusive education of children with special educational needs. Actual Problems of the Correctional Education, 13 (1), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.32626/2413-2578.2019-13.157-175
  3. Pro skhvalennia Natsionalnoi stratehii rozvytku inkliuzyvnoho navchannia na period do 2029 roku ta zatverdzhennia operatsiinoho planu zakhodiv z yii realizatsii ha 2024-2026 roky. (2024). Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy No. 527-r. 07.06.2024. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/527-2024-%D1%80#Text
  4. Tomlinson, C. (2016). Differentiated Classroom, The: Responding to the Needs of All Learners (ASCD). Pearson, 208. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Differentiated-Classroom-Responding-Needs-Learners/dp/0134109503
  5. Taranchenko, O. M., Naida, Yu. M. (2012). Dyferentsiiovane vykladannia v inkliuzyvnomu klasi. Kyiv: Vydavnycha hrupa «A.S.K.», 124. Available at: http://www.ispukr.org.ua/articles/12/12202002.pdf
  6. Loreman, T., McGhie-Richmond, D., Kolupayeva, A., Taranchenko, O., Mazin, D., Crocker, C., Petryshyn, R. (2016). A Canada-Ukraine collaborative initiative for introducing inclusive education for children with disabilities in Ukraine: participant perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27 (1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1018912
  7. Martynchuk, O., Skrypnyk, T., Sofiy, N., Hanssen, N. B.; Hanssen, N. B., Hansén, S.-E., Ström, K. (Eds.) (2021). Inclusive education in Ukraine: Tension between policy and practice. Dialogues between Northern and Eastern Europe on the Development of Inclusion. Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. London: Routledge, 148–167. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367810368-13
  8. Florian, L., Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37 (5). 813–828. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23077052
  9. Sokal, L., Katz, J. (2015). Effects of the three-block model of universal design for learning on early and late middle school students’ engagement. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10 (2), 65–82. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1144326
  10. Holovina, O. (2020). Dyferentsiiovane vykladannia – yak pidlashtuvaty navchannia pid kozhnoho uchnia. NUSh. Available at: https://nus.org.ua/2020/04/21/dyferentsijovane-vykladannya-yak-pidlashtuvaty-navchannya-pid-kozhnogo-uchnya/

Published

2025-09-25

How to Cite

Martynchuk, O., Skrypnyk, T., & Naida, J. (2025). Taking into account the educational needs of students in an inclusive environment: the role of differentiated teaching. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (3 (64), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2025.339117

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education