Taking into account the educational needs of students in an inclusive environment: the role of differentiated teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2025.339117Keywords:
inclusive pedagogical approach, differentiated teaching, universal design in education, differentiation of learning content, differentiation of the learning process, differentiation of learning outcomesAbstract
The article analyzes two key inclusive pedagogical approaches—universal design for learning (UDL) and differentiated instruction—in the context of creating an accessible and effective educational environment for all students. UDL is defined as a technology for pre-designing content, methods, and means of teaching, taking into account the diversity of students and potential barriers, which ensures the achievement of common learning goals in different ways. Differentiated instruction is characterized as an approach that involves adapting not only the forms and methods of instruction, but also the goals themselves to the individual needs, readiness, and abilities of students. It is emphasized that in differentiated instruction, results may vary for each student, but are always focused on maximum personal progress. It is noted that both approaches are complementary tools of inclusive education, which, when used in combination, enhance the engagement, motivation, and success of all students, including those with special educational needs. In this context, the study pays particular attention to the theoretical foundations of differentiated teaching as one of the effective inclusive pedagogical approaches that ensures the organization of the educational process taking into account the level of preparedness, interests, cognitive styles, and special educational needs of students. The article analyzes the approaches of foreign and Ukrainian scientists to understanding the differentiation of content, process, and product of learning, identifies the key ideas that characterize each of these areas, and outlines the possibilities for their use to improve the effectiveness of learning, engage students in active interaction, and create conditions that will contribute to the formation of an active position of students and ensure that they achieve specific educational goals
References
- Loreman, T. (2017). Pedagogy for Inclusive Education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.148
- Martynchuk, O. (2019). Inclusive pedagogy as a scientific factor of development of competence in the field of inclusive education of children with special educational needs. Actual Problems of the Correctional Education, 13 (1), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.32626/2413-2578.2019-13.157-175
- Pro skhvalennia Natsionalnoi stratehii rozvytku inkliuzyvnoho navchannia na period do 2029 roku ta zatverdzhennia operatsiinoho planu zakhodiv z yii realizatsii ha 2024-2026 roky. (2024). Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy No. 527-r. 07.06.2024. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/527-2024-%D1%80#Text
- Tomlinson, C. (2016). Differentiated Classroom, The: Responding to the Needs of All Learners (ASCD). Pearson, 208. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Differentiated-Classroom-Responding-Needs-Learners/dp/0134109503
- Taranchenko, O. M., Naida, Yu. M. (2012). Dyferentsiiovane vykladannia v inkliuzyvnomu klasi. Kyiv: Vydavnycha hrupa «A.S.K.», 124. Available at: http://www.ispukr.org.ua/articles/12/12202002.pdf
- Loreman, T., McGhie-Richmond, D., Kolupayeva, A., Taranchenko, O., Mazin, D., Crocker, C., Petryshyn, R. (2016). A Canada-Ukraine collaborative initiative for introducing inclusive education for children with disabilities in Ukraine: participant perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27 (1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1018912
- Martynchuk, O., Skrypnyk, T., Sofiy, N., Hanssen, N. B.; Hanssen, N. B., Hansén, S.-E., Ström, K. (Eds.) (2021). Inclusive education in Ukraine: Tension between policy and practice. Dialogues between Northern and Eastern Europe on the Development of Inclusion. Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. London: Routledge, 148–167. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367810368-13
- Florian, L., Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37 (5). 813–828. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23077052
- Sokal, L., Katz, J. (2015). Effects of the three-block model of universal design for learning on early and late middle school students’ engagement. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10 (2), 65–82. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1144326
- Holovina, O. (2020). Dyferentsiiovane vykladannia – yak pidlashtuvaty navchannia pid kozhnoho uchnia. NUSh. Available at: https://nus.org.ua/2020/04/21/dyferentsijovane-vykladannya-yak-pidlashtuvaty-navchannya-pid-kozhnogo-uchnya/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Olena Martynchuk, Tetiana Skrypnyk, Julia Naida

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.



