Interactive applications as a means of effective teaching in higher education institutions in Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2026.352727

Keywords:

higher education institutions in Ukraine, interactive applications, interactive digital platforms

Abstract

The article is focused on the pressing issue of using interactive applications as effective teaching tools in Ukrainian higher education institutions. It highlights that using interactive applications, specifically interactive digital platforms, in the modern educational process ensures the best possible combination of theoretical information and its practical application. The authors analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of using interactive applications and their integration into interactive learning and concluded that a characteristic feature of modern higher education in Ukraine is the use of interactive digital platforms, such as Baamboozle, Wordwall, LearningApps.org, and Genially. It was determined that the use of various digital applications helps teachers develop interesting lessons that are usually aimed at solving several tasks: gamification of learning, consolidation of the material studied, and assessment of learning outcomes. The universal educational tool Genially was analyzed, whose interactive capabilities help make learning in Ukrainian higher education institutions more productive, motivating, and modern. The use of interactive applications provides teachers in higher education institutions with tools for analytics and assessment, as well as the ability to adapt content to different formats (course, practical class, seminar, independent study). The main advantages of using digital applications have been identified, namely time savings, accessibility and flexibility, interactivity and personalization, and objectivity. At the same time, the authors emphasize that the use of interactive applications in the educational process in higher education institutions in Ukraine should be organically combined with traditional teaching. With this in mind, teachers should carefully consider the order, in which traditional methods and interactive applications are used, without overusing the latter, as this can lead to a decrease in motivation

Author Biographies

Valentyna Slipchuk, Bogomolets National Medical University

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor

Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Halyna Yuzkiv, Bogomolets National Medical University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Language Studies

Nataliia Marchenko, Mykhailo Drahomanov Ukrainian State University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Pedagogy

References

  1. Mospan, N., Slipchuk, V. (2020). COVID-19 Impact on Medical Education: Evidence of International Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8 (12B), 8393–8401. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082645
  2. Aristovnik, A., Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N. et al. (2025). Higher Education Students’ Evolving Perceptions of Chat GPT: Global Survey Data from the Academic Year 2024–2025. Mendeley Data. http://doi.org/10.17632/nv2343nwsb
  3. Bakhadirov, M., Alasgarova, R., Rzayev, J. (2024). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Use of Artificial Intelligence for Instructional Purposes. IAFOR Journal of Education, 12 (2), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.2.01
  4. Marchenko, N., Slipchuk, V., Yuzkiv, H. (2023). Interactive learning methods in higher education institutions. The Modern Higher Education Review, 8, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.28925/2518-7635.2023.810
  5. Slipchuk, V., Yuzkiv, H. (2024). Transformation of higher medical education in crisis in Ukraine. The Modern Higher Education Review, 9, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.28925/2617-5266/2024.98
  6. Yuzkiv, H., Slipchuk, V., Batechko, N., Mykhailichenko, M., Yanchytska, K., Serhii, K. (2022). Internal Quality Assurance of the Education Program at Higher Educational Institutions. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11 (9), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n9p98
  7. Krecar, I. M., Kolega, M., Jurcec, L. (2024). Perception of ChatGPT Usage for Homework Assignments: Students’ and Professors’ Perspectives. IAFOR Journal of Education, 12 (2), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.12.2.02
  8. Luckin, R. (2024). Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: rethinking education for the future. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 39 (1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-04-2024-0108
  9. Klopfer, E., Reich, J., Abelson, H., Breazeal, C. (2024). Generative AI and K-12 Education: An MIT Perspective. An MIT Exploration of Generative AI. https://doi.org/10.21428/e4baedd9.81164b06
  10. Sharples, M. (2019). Practical Pedagogy. 40 New Ways to Teach and Learn. Routledge, 266. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485534
  11. Machleid, F., Kaczmarczyk, R., Johann, D., Balčiūnas, J., Atienza-Carbonell, B., von Maltzahn, F., Mosch, L. (2020). Perceptions of Digital Health Education Among European Medical Students: Mixed Methods Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22 (8), e19827. https://doi.org/10.2196/19827
  12. Almansour, M., Alfhaid, F. M. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and the personalization of health professional education: A narrative review. Medicine, 103 (31), e38955. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000038955
  13. Kim, K., Cho, K., Jang, R., Kyung, S., Lee, S., Ham, S. et al. (2024). Updated Primer on Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models in Medical Imaging for Medical Professionals. Korean Journal of Radiology, 25 (3), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.0818
  14. Eysenbach, G. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for Papers. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e46885. https://doi.org/10.2196/46885
  15. Karabacak, M., Ozkara, B. B., Margetis, K., Wintermark, M., Bisdas, S. (2023). The Advent of Generative Language Models in Medical Education. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e48163. https://doi.org/10.2196/48163
  16. Preiksaitis, C., Rose, C. (2023). Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Scoping Review. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e48785. https://doi.org/10.2196/48785
  17. Shoja, M. M., Van de Ridder, J. M. M., Rajput, V. (2023). The Emerging Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education, Research, and Practice. Cureus, 15 (6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40883
  18. Dudin, O., Mintser, O., Sulaieva, O. (2021). Artificial intelligence and next generation pathology: towards personalized medicine. Proceedings of the Shevchenko Scientific Society. Medical Sciences, 65 (2). https://doi.org/10.25040/ntsh2021.02.07
  19. Averkyna М., Lykhosherstova, Y. (2023). Digital platforms in interactive learning. Modeling the Development of the Economic Systems, 1, 128–132. https://doi.org/10.31891/mdes/2023-7-18

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Slipchuk, V., Yuzkiv, H., & Marchenko, N. (2026). Interactive applications as a means of effective teaching in higher education institutions in Ukraine. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (1 (66), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2026.352727

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education