The problem of recognition of the young teacher status in Ukraine

Authors

  • Олена Володимирівна Тринус Institute of pedagogical education and adult education of the National academy of pedagogical sciences of Ukraine M. Berlynskogo str., 9, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04060, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-0796

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.91294

Keywords:

youth, formation of youth, teaching profession, young teacher, young specialist status

Abstract

Taking into account the needs of modern school, the question about the quality of pedagogical activity, recognition of status of the young teacher, able to replace the experienced educators, to be adequate to the new educational situation and new complicated conditions of professional activity, becomes topical. In the article the author aims to discover the essence of the notion “the young teacher” and outline the problems of its status recognition in Ukraine. It is determined, that the category “the young teacher” is connected with age period “the youth”, is used related to the profession but not age, and means social group with big labor potential. It was established, that the negative tendencies as to the young teacher status recognition are conditioned by insufficient readiness of the youth to pedagogical activity, large number of working teachers of pre-pension and pension age, low lovel of prestisiousness of pedagogical specialty.

As a result of the study of genesis of definition of the young teacher status it was discovered, that this term is accordant to the category “the young specialist”, which official use is a base for guaranteeing of social support for young people. The author proves that the recognition of young teacher status in Ukraine is worthy of the state support that will favor the inflow of young teachers, able to be adequate to the new educational situation and new complicated conditions of professional activity

Author Biography

Олена Володимирівна Тринус, Institute of pedagogical education and adult education of the National academy of pedagogical sciences of Ukraine M. Berlynskogo str., 9, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04060

PhD

References

  1. Zhernosek, I. P. (1998). Naukovo-metodychna robota v zahalnoosvitnii shkoli [Scientific-methodical work in a secondary school]. Kyiv: IZMN, 160.
  2. Ziaziun, I. A., Kramushchnko, L. V., Kryvonos, I. F., Myroshnyk, O. G., Semychenko, V. A., Tarasevych, N. M.; Zjazjun, I. A. (Ed.) (2008). Pedahohichna maisternist [Pedagogical skills]. Kyiv: SPD Bogdanova A. M., 376.
  3. Kokun, O. M. (Ed.) (2008). Psykhofiziolohichne zabezpechennia hotovnosti studentiv do pedahohichnoi diialnosti [Psychophysiological preparedness of students for educational activities]. Kyiv: Pedagogical thought, 296.
  4. Maksymets, M. (2007). Holovni kontseptualni pidkhody do problemy profesiinoho stanovlennia molodoho vchytelia [The main conceptual approaches to professional development of young teachers]. Bulletin of Lviv University, 22, 75–83.
  5. Moroz, A. H. (1998). Professyonalnaia adaptatsiia molodoho uchytelia [Professyonalnaya adaptation of the young teacher]. Kyiv: NPU im. M. P. Dragomanova, 326.
  6. Petrusenko, S. Iu. (2009). Pedahohichni umovy profesiinoho stanovlennia molodykh uchyteliv u zahalnoosvitnomu navchalnomu zakladi [Pedagogical conditions of professional development of young teachers in secondary schools]. Odessa, 20.
  7. Upatova, I. (2013). Orhanizatsiia samoosvity molodoho vchytelia (1970–1980-kh rr.) [Company self young teacher (1970–1980's.)]. Teoriia i metodyka upravlinnia osvitoiu, 10. Available at: http://www.twirpx.com/file/1413411/
  8. Radul, V. V. (1997). Sotsialna zrilist molodoho vchytelia [Social maturity of a young teacher]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola, 269.
  9. Shevchenko, O. A. (2014). Profesiinyi rozvytok molodoho vchytelia v systemi pisliadyplomnoi pedahohichnoi osvity [Professional development of young teachers in postgraduate education]. Zaporіzhzhya, 20.
  10. Chaikina, N. O. (1997). Psykholohichna struktura profesiinoi adaptatsii molodoho vchytelia [Psychological structure of professional adaptation of young teachers]. Kyiv, 24.
  11. Djatlenko, N. M. (2010). Vnutrishni ta zovnishni determinanty profesijnoi' adaptacii' molodogo vchytelja. Visnyk psyhologii' i social'noi' pedagogiky, 2. Available at: http://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/2730/1/N_Dyatlenko_VPiSP_2_IPPO.pdf
  12. Mukan, N. V., Havryliuk, M. V. (2009). Rozvytok profesiinykh yakostei vchyteliv-pochatkivtsiv u systemi neperervnoi pedahohichnoi osvity Velykoi Brytani [Development of professional skills of teachers beginning in the system of continuous pedagogical education UK]. Visnyk NTUU«KPI». Filosofija. Psyhologija. Pedagogika, 3 (27), 138–141. Available at: http://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/9904
  13. Poperechna, L. (2013). Profesiinyi rozvytok vchytelia-pochatkivtsia u systemi neperervnoi pedahohichnoi osvity Rosiiskoi Federatsii ta Ukrainy [Professional development of teachers novice in the system of continuous pedagogical education the Russian Federation and Ukraine]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia profesiinoi osvity, 3, 247–253.
  14. Chuvakova, T. H. (2004). Profesiine stanovlennia molodoho vchytelia u SShA [Professional growth of young teachers in the USA]. Kyiv, 20.
  15. Zaichykova, T. V. (2005). Sotsialno-psykholohichni determinanty syndromu «profesiinoho vyhorannia» u vchyteliv [Socio-psychological determinants of the syndrome of "burnout" in the classroom]. Kyiv, 20.
  16. Zenkovskyi, V. V. (1996). Pedahohyka [Pedagogika]. Moscow, 153.
  17. Yaremenko, V., Slipushko, O. (2001). Novyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [New Dictionary of Ukrainian language]. Kyiv: Akonit, 926.
  18. Lysovskyi, V. T. (Ed.) (1996). Sotsyolohyia molodezhy [Sociology Youth]. Saint Petersburg: Publishing house of the University of St. Petersburg, 460.
  19. Kon, Y. (1989). Psykholohyia rannei yunosty [Psychology of early adolescence]. Moscow: Prosveshhenye, 254.
  20. Teremko, V. H. (2005). Sotsiolohiia [Sociology]. Kyiv: Akademiia, 432.
  21. Yung, K. G. (1995). Psihologicheskie tipy [Psychological Types]. Saint Petersburg: Juventa, 715.
  22. Piletska, L. (2013). Stanovlennia osobystosti v umovakh profesiinoi mobilnosti [The formation of the individual in terms of professional mobility]. Teoretychni i prykladni problemy psykholohii, 3, 205–210. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Tippp_2013_3_35
  23. Klimov, E. A. (2004). Psihologiya professional'nogo samoopredeleniya [Psychology of professional self-determination]. Moscow: Akademyja, 304.
  24. Bolotova, E. L. (2010). Est ly pravovoi status u molodoho spetsyalysta? [Is there a legal status of a young professional?]. Narodnoe obrazovanie, 2, 132–138.
  25. Koval, H. V. (2010). Sotsialna vrazlyvist molodykh spetsialistiv na rynku pratsi v Ukraini [Sotsіalna vrazlivіst molodih spetsіalіstіv on market analysis pratsі in Ukraіnі]. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly. Ser.: Politolohiia, 131 (118), 107–111. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Npchdupol_2010_131_118_24

Downloads

Published

2017-01-31

How to Cite

Тринус, О. В. (2017). The problem of recognition of the young teacher status in Ukraine. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (1 (9), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2017.91294

Issue

No. 1 (9) (2017)

Section

Pedagogical Education

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Олена Володимирівна Тринус

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.