Photovoice methodology in social work research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.22.2.3Keywords:
photovoice, critical paradigm, documentary photography, social work, social change, empowermentAbstract
In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in the use of such a visual research method as photovoice. This article aims to characterize photovoice as a research methodology in social work. The study analyzed 30 full-text English-language publications, most of which were written by US researchers. The analysis of publications was based on the following criteria: (1) the general purpose of the photo voice as a methodology of research in social work and its philosophy; (2) stages and procedures for the use of photovoice, the role of researchers and other research participants; (3) examples of the use of photo voice in foreign social work; (4) the advantages and limitations of photovoice identified by researchers who have used this methodology in theirresearch. Photovoice is a participatory and reflective method of research in social work. Its main tasks include: to encourage research participants to express their own opinions; to form critical consciousness through group discussion; achieve policy change. Photovoice is based on: feminist theory; critical pedagogy; participatory approach to documentary photography. It uses transformational or emancipatory frameworks of analysis that focus on social change. The use of photovoice involves compliance with a number of successive stages, some of which may be repeated: the preparatory stage; introductory group session; work of research participants on photo collection; group discussion; preparation of the report; discussion of results; organization of an exhibition of works; conveying information to those on whom decision-making depends. Photovoice is used to study the needs of various vulnerable groups, especially those who are discriminated and whose voice is often ignored. This reflective method can also be useful in studying various aspects of social work practice.References
Батаєва, К. В. (2017). Соціальна візуалістика і медіа-візуальність. Київ: Кондор-Видавництво. [Bataeva, K. V. (2017). Social visualization and media visuality. Kyiv: Condor Publishing House. (in Ukrainian)].
Бондар, В., Одинак, Я. (2011). Візуальна соціологія: розширення епістемологічних меж соціологічної науки. Наукові записки НАУКМА. Соціологічні науки, 122: 3–9. [Bondar, V., Odinak, Ya. (2011). Visual sociology: expanding the epistemological boundaries of sociological science. Scientific notes of NAUKMA. Sociological sciences, 122: 3–9. (in Ukrainian)].
Карагодіна, О., Семигіна, Т. (2022). Перші дисертаційні дослідження із соціальної роботи в Україні: критична оцінка. Social Work and Education, 9 (1): 44-55. [Karagodina, O., Semigina, T. (2022). The first dissertation studies on social work in Ukraine: a critical assessment. Social Work and Education, 9 (1): 44-55. (in Ukrainian)]. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.22.1.3.
Кошова, І. В. (2020). Фотографія як метод дослідження у психології та соціології. Наукові записки НДУ ім. М. Гоголя, 2: 8-18. [Koshova, I. V. (2020). Photography as a research method in psychology and sociology. Scientific notes of NSU named after M. Gogol, 2: 8-18. (in Ukrainian)]. DOI: 10.31654/2663-4902-2020-РР-2-8-18.
Марченко, А. М. (2011). Аналіз фотографічних зображень у соціології: можливості та обмеження. Методологія, теорія та практика соціологічного аналізу сучасного суспільства, 17: 255–258. [Marchenko, A. M. (2011). Analysis of photographic images in sociology: opportunities and limitations. Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society, 17: 255–258. (in Ukrainian)].
Мухина, В., Дугарова, Т. (2010). Метод научной фотографии в психологии личности и этнопсихологии. Развитие личности, 1: 152-179. [Mukhina, V., Dugarova, T. (2010). The method of scientific photography in personality psychology and ethnopsychology. Personality development, 1: 152-179. (in Ukrainian)].
Семигіна Т.В. (2020). Клієнти соціальної роботи як співдослідники. Міжгалузеві диспути: динаміка та розвиток сучасних наукових досліджень: матеріали міжнар. наукової конф. Т.2. (c. 33-35). Вінниця: МЦНД. [Semigina T.V. (2020). Social work clients as co-researchers. Interdisciplinary disputes: dynamics and development of modern scientific research: materials of the international scientific conference T.2. (c. 33-35). Vinnytsia: MCND. (in Ukrainian)].
Семигіна, Т. (2021). Критична парадигма досліджень у сучасній соціальній роботі. [Semigina, T. (2021). Critical research paradigm in modern social work]. Scholarly disputes in philosophy, sociology, political science, and history amidst globalization and digitalization : conference proceedings (pp. 96-99). Riga: Baltija Publishing. (in Ukrainian).
Фрейре, П. (2003). Педагогіка пригноблених. Київ: Юніверс. [Freire, P. (2003). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Kyiv: Universe. (in Ukrainian)].
Штомпка, П. (2007). Визуальная социология. Фотография как метод исследования. Москва: Логос. [Stompka, P. (2007). Visual sociology. Photography as a research method. Moscow: Logos. (in Russian)].
Bell, L. et al. (2020). Mothers’ voices: Hearing and assessing the contributions of ‘birth mothers’ to the development of social work interventions and family support. British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa138.
Bowers, H. P. (2017). A case study of photovoice as a critical reflection strategy in a field seminar. Practice Digest, 7(2): 1–10.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4): 589–597.
Breny, J. M. & McMorrow, S. L. (2021). Photovoice for Social Justice: Visual Representation in Action. USA: Sage.
Budig, K. et al.(2018). Photovoice and empowerment: Evaluating the transformative potential of a participatory action research project. BMC Public Health, 18(1): 432.
Coemans, S., Raymakers, A-L,. Vandenabeele, J., Hannes, K. (2019). Evaluating the extent to which social researchers apply feminist and empowerment frameworks in photovoice studies with female participants: A literature review. Qualitative Social Work, 18(1):37-59.
Dassah, E., Aldersey, H. M., & Norman, K. E. (2017). Photovoice and persons with physical disabilities: A scoping review of the literature. Qualitative Health Research, 27(9):1412–1422.
Desyllas, M. C. (2014). Using photovoice with sex workers: The power of art, agency and resistance. Qualitative Social Work, 13(4): 477–501.
Evans-Agnew, R. A., & Rosemberg, M. A. S. (2016). Questioning photovoice research: Whose voice? Qualitative Health Research, 26(8): 1019-1030.
Ferlatte, O. et al. (2022). Virtual Photovoice With Older Adults: Methodological Reflections during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Qual Methods, doi: 10.1177/16094069221095656.
Fisher-Borne, M., & Brown, A. (2018). A Case Study Using Photovoice to Explore Racial and Social Identity Among Young Black Men: Implications for Social Work Research and Practice. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(2): 157-175.
Hannes, K. & Parylo, O. (2014). Let’s play it safe: Ethical considerations from participants in a photovoice research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13: 255–274.
Hergenrather, K.C., Rhodes, S.D. & Clark, G. (2006) .Windows to work: Exploring employment-seeking behaviors of persons with HIV/AIDS through photovoice. AIDS Education and Prevention, 18(3): 243–258.
Hergenrather, K.C., Rhodes, S.D. & Cowan C.A. et al. (2009). Photovoice as community-based participatory research: A qualitative review. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33(6): 686–698.
Jarldon, M. (2019). Photovoice Handbook for Social Workers Method, Practicalities and Possibilities for Social Change. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Jay, M. (2002). That visual turn. Journal of Visual Culture;1(1): 87-92.
Jurkowski, J.M. & Paul-Ward, A. (2007). Photovoice with vulnerable populations: Addressing disparities in health promotion among people with intellectual disabilities. Health Promotion Practice, 8(4): 358–365.
Jurkowski, J.M. (2008). Photovoice as Participatory Action Research Tool for Engaging People With Intellectual Disabilities in Research and Program Development. Intellect Dev Disabil, 46 (1): 1–11.
Kuratani, D. & Lai, E. (2011). TEAM Lab - Photovoice Literature Review. Available at: https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.usc.edu/dist/0/198/files/2018/08/Photovoice-Literature-Review-FINAL-22ltfmn.pdf.
LaDonna, K. A., & Venance, S. L. (2015). Picturing the Experience of Living With Myotonic Dystrophy (DM1): A Qualitative Exploration Using Photovoice. The Journal of neuroscience nursing, 47(5): 285–295.
Lewinson, T., Robinson-Dooley, V., & Grant, K. W. (2012). Exploring “home” through residents’ lenses: Assisted living facility residents identify homelike characteristics using photovoice. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 55(8): 745–756.
Luthuli, A. & Wood, L. (2020). Nothing about us without us! A PALAR approach to improving inclusion in a Zimbabwean College of Education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2020.1766124.
Malka, M. (2022). Photo-voices from the classroom: photovoice as a creative learning methodology in social work education. Social Work Education, 41(1): 4-20.
Malka, M., Huss, E., Bendarker, L., & Musai, O. (2018). Using photovoice with children of addicted parents to integrate phenomenological and social reality. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 60: 82–90.
Peabody, C.G. (2013). Using photovoice as a tool to engage social work students in social justice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work ,33(3): 251–265.
Purcell, R. (2007). Images for change: Community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal, 44(1): 111–122.
Rose, G. (2004). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: Sage.
Russell, A.C. & Diaz, N.D. (2013). Photography in social work research: Using visual image to humanize findings. Qualitative Social Work.;12(4):433-453.
Strack, R.W., Magill, C., & McDonagh, K. (2000). Engaging youth through Photovoice. Health Promotion Practice, 5(1):49-58.
Streng, J.M., Rhodes, S.D., Ayala, G.X., et al. (2004). Realidad Latina: Latino adolescents, their school, and a university use Photovoice to examine and address the influence of immigration. Journal of interprofessional care, 18(4): 403-15.
Sutton-Brown, C. A. (2014). Photovoice: A Methodological Guide. Photography and Culture, 7(2): 169-185.
Wang, C.C. & Burris, M.A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3): 369–387.
Weiler, K. (1988). Women Teaching for Change: Gender, Class, and Power. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Weiser, J. (2002). Phototherapy techniques: exploring the secrets of personal snapshots and family albums. Child and Family, Spring/Summer, 16-25.
Wiltshire, G. & Ronkainen, N. (2021). A realist approach to thematic analysis: making sense of qualitative data through experiential, inferential and dispositional themes. Journal of Critical Realism, 20 (2): 159-180.
Yancey, K. B., ed. (1994). Voices on voice: Perspectives, definitions, inquiry. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Yoshihama, M., & Yunomae, T. (2018). Participatory investigation of the great east Japan disaster: PhotoVoice from women affected by the calamity. Social Work, 63(3):234–243.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Тетяна Семигіна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Social Work and Education is an open access journal. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0