Critical ethnography: opportunities for social work research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.22.3.7Keywords:
ethnographic research, critical theory, critical social work, observation, reflection, social changeAbstract
Social work research is conducted using various approaches and methods. This article aims to characterize critical ethnography and its opportunities for critical social work aimed at overcoming structural inequalities. Within the framework of the study, an analysis of 28 English-language full-text publications was carried out according to the following criteria: (1) the general purpose of critical ethnography as a research methodology in social work and its philosophy; (2) stages and procedures for using critical ethnography, the roles of researchers and other research participants; (3) cases of the use of critical ethnography in social work; (4) the advantages and limitations of critical ethnography. Critical ethnography, like traditional ethnography, involves long-term observations of certain practices in the "field conditions." Observations can be supplemented by other methods that make it possible to assess the life experience of research participants from the perspective of the participants themselves. Critical ethnography makes it possible to identify and describe structural inequality in society and to challenge existing practices, in particular, practices of providing social services. The main focus of research is the identification of hidden values and the use of power relations that reinforce the inequality of certain social groups and social injustice. Researchers are expected to have their own position and provide adequate theoretical justification for their actions, deep immersion in the context and social situation. The use of critical ethnography involves a number of successive stages: the preparatory stage; the organizational and methodological stage; the field stage; the stage of research findings analysis; the presentation and dissemination of the results in order to promote social change.References
Бойко, О. М. (2017). Професійна підготовка фахівців із соціальної роботи третього рівня вищої освіти у Великій Британії : Дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня к-та пед. наук. Київ. [Boyko, O.M. (2017). Professional training of social work specialists of the third level of higher education in Great Britain: Dissertation. Kyiv (in Ukrainian)].
Єрошенко, К. М. та Семигіна, Т. В. (2018). Дослідження в дії у соціальній роботі: ролі дослідника. Збірник наукових праць Хмельницького інституту соціальних технологій Університету «Україна», 15, 123-126. [Yeroshenko, K. M. & Semigina, T. V. (2018). Action research in social work: the role of the researcher. Collection of scientific papers of the Khmelnytskyi Institute of Social Technologies of the University "Ukraine", 15, 123-126 (in Ukrainian)].
Карагодіна, О., Семигіна, Т. (2022). Перші дисертаційні дослідження із соціальної роботи в Україні: критична оцінка. Social Work and Education, 9 (1), 44-55. [ [Karagodina, O. & Semigina, T. (2022). The first dissertations on social work in Ukraine: a critical assessment. Social Work and Education, 9 (1), 44-55 (in Ukrainian)].
Кухта, М. (2108). Соціальний потенціал людей старшого віку в Україні. Київ: КНУКіМ. [Kukhta, M. (2108). Social potential of older people in Ukraine. Kyiv: KNUKiM. (in Ukrainian)].
Оніщик, Ю. В., Семигіна, Т. В., & Пожидаєва, О. В. (2020). Подолання гендерної нерівності в Україні: політико-правовий, соціальний та освітній виміри. Науковий вісник Південноукраїнського національного педагогічного університету імені К.Д. Ушинського, 4(133), 109-116. [Onishchyk, Y. V., Semigina, T. V., & Pozhidayeva, O. V. (2020). Overcoming gender inequality in Ukraine: political, legal, social and educational dimensions. Scientific Bulletin of the South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinskogo, 4(133), 109-116 (in Ukrainian)].
Повідайчик, О., Жиленко, Р. (2018). Методи досліджень у соціальній роботі. Ужгород: АУТДОРШАРК. [Povidaichyk, O. & Zhylenko, R. (2018). Research methods in social work. Uzhhorod: OUTDORSHARK (in Ukrainian)].
Семигіна, Т. (2022). Методологія фотоголос (photovoice) у дослідженнях із соціальної роботи. Social Work and Education, 9(2), 210-225. [Semigina, T. (2022). Photovoice methodology in social work research. Social Work and Education, 9(2), 210-225 (in Ukrainian)].
Семигіна, Т. (2021a). Використання обгрунтованої теорії у дослідженнях із соціальної роботи. Ricerche scientifiche e metodi della loro realizzazione. T. 2 (pp. 8-10). Bologna-Vinnytsia: Associazione Italiana di Storia Urbana & Piattaforma scientifica europea. [Semigina, T. (2021a). Use of grounded theory in social work research. Ricerche scientifiche e metodi della loro realization. T. 2 (pp. 8-10). Bologna-Vinnytsia: Associazione Italiana di Storia Urbana & Piattaforma scientifica europea (in Ukrainian)].
Семигіна, Т. (2021b). Дослідники як агенти змін (використання дослідження в дії у соціальній роботі). Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Серія «Соціальна робота», 1(7), 37-41. [Semigina, T. (2021b). Researchers as agents of change (using action research in social work). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University. Series "Social Work", 1(7), 37-41 (in Ukrainian)].
Семигіна, Т. (2021c). Критична парадигма досліджень у сучасній соціальній роботі. Scholarly disputes in philosophy, sociology, political science, and history amidst globalization and digitalization : conference proceedings. Riga: Baltija Publishing, 96-99. [Semigina, T. (2021c). Critical paradigm of research in modern social work. Scholarly disputes in philosophy, sociology, political science, and history amidst globalization and digitalization: conference proceedings. Riga: Baltija Publishing, 96-99 (in Ukrainian)].
Семигіна, Т.В. (2020a). Дослухаючись до розповідей: наративні дослідження у соціальній роботі. Korszerű műszerek és algoritmusa tapasztalati és elmé leti tudományos kutatási. Hang 2 (рр. 115-117). Budapest: Európean Scientific Platforme. [Semigina, T.V. (2020a). Listening to Stories: Narrative Research in Social Work. Korszerő szümrek és algoritoma ertalizati és elmé leti száchní prászky. Hang 2 (pp. 115-117). Budapest: European Scientific Platform (in Ukrainian)].
Семигіна, Т.В. (2020b). Чи завжди цифри мають значення: Огляд парадигм дослідження у соціальній роботі. Path of science, 6(7): 3001-3011. [Semigina, T.V. (2020b). Do numbers always matter: An overview of research paradigms in social work. Path of Science, 6 (7): 3001-3011 (in Ukrainian)].
Фрейре, П. (2003). Педагогіка пригноблених. Київ: Юніверс. [Freire, P. (2003). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Kyiv: Universe (in Ukrainian)].
Ярошенко, А.А. та Семигіна, Т.В. (2019). Розпізнати нерівність: гендерний аналіз навчальних матеріалів у соціальній роботі. Збірник наукових праць Кам’янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка. Серія соціально-педагогічна, 32, 183-198. [Yaroshenko, A.A. & Semigina, T.V. (2019). Recognizing Inequality: A Gender Analysis of Educational Materials in Social Work. Collection of scientific works of Kamianets-Podilskyi National University named after Ivan Ohienko. Socio-pedagogical series, 32, 183-198 (in Ukrainian)].
Anderson, G. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new Directions. Review of Educational Research, 59, 249–270.
Angus, L. (1986). Research traditions, ideology and critical ethnography, Discourse, 7, 61–77.
Bauman, Z. (1976). Towards a Critical Sociology: An Essay on Common-Sense and Emancipation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Brown, S. G., & Dobrin, S. I. (2004). Ethnography unbound: From theory shock to critical praxis. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Burnette, C. E. (2015). From the Ground Up: Indigenous Women's after Violence Experiences with the Formal Service System in the United States. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1526–1545.
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
Chang, H, Ngunjiri, F & Hernandez, K (2012) Developing Qualitative Enquiry: Collaborative AutoEthnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast
Enquix, B. (2014). Negotiating the field: Rethinking ethnographic authority, experience and the frontiers of research. Qualitative Research, 14(1): 79–94.
Fenton, J. (2019). Social Work for Lazy Radicals: Relationship Building, Critical Thinking and Courage in Practice. London: Red Globe Press.
Ferguson, H. (2018). Making home visits: Creativity and the embodied practices of home visiting in social work and child protection. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 17(1), 65–80.
Fishberg, R. (2022). Thinking With Transnational Institutional Ethnography: Moving Towards Spatially Conscious Methods for Studying Geographically Dispersed
People and Institutions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221097779
Fitzi, G. (2022). The Path to Critical Sociology. In: Normative Intermittency. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06174-5_1
Gant, V. et al. (2019). Social work through collaborative autoethnography. Social Work Education, 38(6), 707-720.
Gitlin, A., Siegal, M. & Boru, K. (1989). The politics of method: From leftist ethnography to educative research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 2, 237–253.
Hagues, R. (2021). Conducting critical ethnography: Personal reflections on the role of the researcher. International Social Work, 64(3), 438-443.
Healy, K. (2001). Reinventing critical social work. Critical Social Work, 2(1). https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5616
Hine, C (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
Hulko, W., Brotman. S., Stern, L. et al. (2019). Everyday Lives and Realities. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Humphries, B. (2008). Social work research for social justice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jordan, S. & Yeomans, D. (1995). Critical Ethnography: problems in contemporary theory and practice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16:3, 389-408.
Leigh, J., Disney, T., Warwick, L., Ferguson, H., Beddoe, L., & Cooner, T. S. (2021). Revealing the hidden performances of social work practice: The ethnographic process of gaining access, getting into place and impression management. Qualitative Social Work, 20(4), 1078–1095.
Maggio, R. (2019). Challenging the challenge: The Ethics of Early Intervention. Narrare i gruppi, 14(1), 79-102.
May, S.A. (1997). Critical Ethnography. In: Hornberger, N.H. & Corson, D., eds. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4535-0_19
Mikkonen, E., Laitinen, M. & Hill, C. (2017). Hierarchies of knowledge: Analyzing inequalities within the social work ethnographic research process as ethical notions in knowledge production. Qualitative Social Work, 16(4), 515–532
Oswald, A. G., Bussey, S., Thompson, M., & Ortega-Williams, A. (2022). Disrupting hegemony in social work doctoral education and research: Using autoethnography to uncover possibilities for radical transformation. Qualitative Social Work, 21(1), 112–128.
Pacheco-Vega R. & Parizeau, K. (2018). Doubly Engaged Ethnography: Opportunities and Challenges When Working With Vulnerable Communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918790653
Parada, H. (2004). Social work practices within the restructured child welfare system in Ontario: An Institutional Ethnography. Canadian Social Work Review / Revue Canadienne de Service Social, 21(1), 67–86.
Pease, B., Goldingay, S., Hosken, N., & Nipperess, S. (Eds.). (2016). Doing Critical Social Work: Transformative Practices for Social Justice (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
Pink, S., Ferguson, H., & Kelly, L. (2022). Digital social work: Conceptualising a hybrid anticipatory practice. Qualitative Social Work, 21(2), 413–430.
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., et al. (2016). Digital Ethnography. London: SAGE.
Simon, R. I., & Dippo, D. (1986). On critical ethnographic work. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 17(4), 195-202
Smith, D. E., ed. (2006). Institutional ethnography as practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sobočan, A. M. Bertotti, T. & Strom-Gottfried, K. (2019). Ethical considerations in social work research. European Journal of Social Work, 22:5, 805-818.
Soyini Madison, D. (2005). Critical ethnography: method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Taylor, S. & Roberts, R., eds. (2013). Theory and Practice of Community Social Work. Jaipur: Rawat Publication.
Thomas, J. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography. Newbury Park: Sage.
Witkin, S. L., ed. (2014). Narrating Social Work Through Autoethnography. New York: Columbia University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Тетяна Семигіна
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Social Work and Education is an open access journal. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0