A critical review of the mixed method application and its criticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.23.2.8Keywords:
Mixed Methods Research, Critiquing Mixed Methods Research, Qualitative Research, Quantitative ResearchAbstract
Purpose - This research paper aims to apply and criticize mixed methods research in different fields. Mixed methods research (MMR) has also faced criticism for its conceptual and methodological challenges. Therefore, this study will explore the research’s criticism and strategies for overcoming them. Methodology - Most of the current research works employ a mixed research methodology. Researchers use the mixed methodology to investigate challenging research questions that a single methodology cannot answer. Findings - This research paper presents results related to using mixed methods research in various fields. Some critics argue that MMR lacks methodological rigor and can be time-consuming; others acknowledge its value in providing a more comprehensive understanding of complex social phenomena and marginalized communities. MMR has successfully employed to identify gaps in student knowledge, explore the interplay between psychological and physiological factors in health and illness, and develop more effective policies. However, balancing the depth of qualitative data with the breadth of quantitative data can be challenging, leading to compromises. Practical implications - The findings of this research have important practical implications for researchers and practitioners across various fields. It can be beneficial, specifically in education, health psychology, and public policy. Recommendations - Researchers should consider using mixed methods to examine complex research questions that require a multifaceted approach. Also, they should incorporate both quantitative and qualitative data to provide a more complete understanding of the research question. MMR can help capture diverse perspectives and experiences, particularly for underrepresented populations, providing a more nuanced understanding of social phenomena. These recommendations highlight the potential benefits of using mixed methods research and suggest directions for future research.References
Anguera, M. T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J. L., Sánchez-Algarra, P., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2018). Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name? Quality & Quantity, 52(6), 2757–2770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0700-2
Anguera, M. T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J. L., Sánchez-Algarra, P., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2018). Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name? Quality & Quantity, 52(6), 2757–2770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0700-2
Bazeley, P. (2018). Mixed methods in my bones”: Transcending the qualitative-quantitative divide. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 10(1), 334–341.
Bryman, A. (2021). Mixed methods research: Combining qualitative and quantitative research. Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J.W. & Clark, V.L.P. (2020). Understanding research: A consumer's guide. Pearson.
Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Egawa, T. & Akita, K. (2021). Using mixed-methods research to investigate the impact of teacher feedback on EFL students' writing. TESOL Journal, 12(1), e00471.
Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., & Graham, W.F. (2018). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
Hesse-Biber, S., (2018). Mixed methods research: The challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 10(1), 27-38.
Holst, E.G., Nissen, N. & Nielsen, R.L. (2019). Using mixed methods to explore the experiences of healthcare among transgender and gender nonconforming individuals. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 3-20.
Huang, W.H., Huang, W.Y., Lin, Y.T., & Shadiev (2019). Investigating the effects of technology-mediated instruction on students' perceived learning outcomes: A mixed-methods study. Computers & Education. 130, 29-43.
Ivankova, N.V., Creswell, J.W., & Stick, S.L. (2018). Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods. 30(1), 44-63.
Johnson, R.B. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2019). Mixed methods research in health psychology: Methodological considerations and design recommendations. Health Psychology Review. 13(1), 57-67.
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Turner, L.A. (2018). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 112-133.
Kim, S.J., Marsack, C.N., Wray, L.A. & Sterlin (2020). Mixed methods approach to evaluating telemedicine for diabetes management. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 26(8), 429-435.
Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.
McEwan, T., Creighton, G., & Olafson, L. (2020). Evaluating a school-based bullying intervention: A mixed methods approach. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 35(2), 139-154.
Mertens, D.M. (2019). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods.
Morgan, D.L. & Yoder, J.H. (2019). Mixed methods research: A critique and a call to pluralism. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 107-121.
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2018). Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 8.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. & Johnson, R.B., (2019). The validity issue in mixed research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 4-22.
Riggio, H.R., Diefenbeck, C.A., & Ferrari, J.R. (2020). Use of mixed methods research in health care. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration. 43(2), 177-208.
Sakata, N. (2022). Embracing the Messiness in Mixed Methods Research: The Craft Attitude. Journal of Mixed Methods Research.
Salloum, S.J., Burchinal, M.R., & Jablon, V. (2019). Mixed methods investigation of the impacts of a preschool literacy program on children's school readiness. Early Education and Development. 30(1), 122-142.
Sandelowski, M. (2018). Qualitative analysis: what it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing & Health. 41(6), 574-582.
Sandelowski, M., Voils, C.I., & Knafl, G. (2018). On quantizing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 4-17.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2020). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage publications.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2019). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences.
Teddlie, c. & Tashakkori, A. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2021a). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2021b). Handbook of Mixed Methods Research. Oxford University Press.
Vebrianto, R., Thahir, M., Putriani, Z., Mahartika, I., Ilhami, A., & Diniya. (2020). Mixed methods research: Trends and issues in research methodology. Bedelau: Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.55748/bjel.v1i2.35
Vebrianto, R., Thahir, M., Putriani, Z., Mahartika, I., Ilhami, A., & Diniya. (2020). Mixed methods research: Trends and issues in research methodology. Bedelau: Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.55748/bjel.v1i2.35
Vivek, R. (2022). Systematic review of modern techniques in qualitative research. Management and Entrepreneurship Trends of Development, 4(22), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-1566/2022-4/22-03
Vivek, R., & Nanthagopan, Y. (2021). Review and comparison of multi-method and mixed method application in research studies. European Journal of Management Issues, 29(4), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.15421/192119
Zhang, W., & Creswell, J. (2013). The use of “mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Medical Care, 51(8), e51-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824642fd
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sathiyakumar Chandrakumar, Ramakrishnan Vivek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Social Work and Education is an open access journal. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0