Between formal partnerships and real impact: how lack of autonomy weakens local participation in humanitarian programs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.25.3.1

Keywords:

humanitarian aid, localization, partnership, autonomy, local humanitarian organizations, international humanitarian organizations, Ukraine

Abstract

The topic of the article is “Between formal partnership and real impact: how the lack of autonomy weakens local participation in humanitarian programs”. The purpose of the study is to identify how the lack of autonomy of local humanitarian organizations weakens their local participation in humanitarian programs. The article focuses on the problem of limited autonomy of local organizations in the implementation of international humanitarian programs in Ukraine. The methodology of the study is based on a theoretical and analytical approach to understanding the processes and concepts that are directly related to the localization of humanitarian aid. The author examines how formalized partnerships without real influence from local actors lead to inefficiency, loss of trust in communities, duplication of initiatives, and reduced adaptability of programs to the context. The author considers autonomy as a basic humanitarian principle that implies independence from political, economic and other external influences, as well as the difficulties of observing it in the context of conflicts and emergencies. Particular attention is paid to the concept of partnership in the humanitarian sector, its potential and challenges, in particular, the inequality in influence and access to resources between international and local organizations. Particular attention is paid to practical examples of interaction between international agencies and Ukrainian NGOs in 2022-2024, which allows to identify barriers to sustainable development and the potential for change. The article offers recommendations for reforming partnership models and the principles of fair localization of humanitarian aid. The findings of the study can be used to improve the effectiveness of localization of humanitarian response in Ukraine. The conclusions note that the limited autonomy of domestic humanitarian organizations in partnership with international structures leads to formalization of the participation of local actors, duplication of efforts, reduced program effectiveness, and loss of motivation among local teams.

Author Biography

Olena Shevchenko, Boris Hrinchenko university, Kyiv

PhD student, Department of Social Pedagogy and Social Work, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 18/2 Bulvarno-Kudriavska Str., Kyiv, 04053

References

Давиденко, П.О., Шаповал, А.О., Костін, М.І. (2022) Проблемні аспекти надання міжнародної гуманітарної допомоги Україні в умовах воєнного стану. Юридичний науковий електронний журнал. № 11. С. 122-125. [Davydenko, P.O., Shapoval, A.O., Kostin, M.I. (2022). Problematic aspects of providing international humanitarian assistance to Ukraine under martial law. Legal scientific electronic journal, 11, 122-125]. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-11/25. [in Ukrainian].

Оцінка базового рівня локалізації гуманітарного реагування в Україні. (2023). Ресурсний центр НДО. 48 с. [Assessment of the baseline level of localization of humanitarian response in Ukraine. NGO Resource Center. (2023)]. URL: https://www.icvanetwork.org/ uploads/2023/09/Humanitarian-Localization-Baseline-for-Ukraine-Ukraine.pdf. [in Ukrainian].

Alsina, D., Eldridge, D. (2025). The effectiveness of humanitarian aid in conflict zones: practitioner views on the transition from in-kind assistance to multi-purpose cash transfers. Journal of International Humanitarian Action. Vol. 10 (2). P. 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-024-00165-6

Annual Ukraine Localization Survey. (2024). URL: https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/annual-ukraine-localization-survey-2024-enuk

Broussard, G., Rubenstein, L.S., Robinson, C. (2019). Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: a systematic review. Journal of International Humanitarian Action. Vol. 15. P. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-019-0063-x

Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO) (European Commission). (2023). Promoting equitable partnerships with local responders in humanitarian settings: DG ECHO guidance note. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 52 p. URL: https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/eudg-echo-

guidance-note-promoting-equitable-partnerships-local-responders-humanitarian-settings

Enabling the local response: emerging humanitarian priorities in Ukraine. (2022). United Kingdom Humanitarian Innovation Hub. March–May 2022. 26 p. URL:https://humanitarianoutcomes.org/sites/default/files/publications/ukraine_review_2022.pdf

Frennesson, L. (2022). International humanitarian organizations perspectives on localization efforts. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022 Vol. 83, 2022. P. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103410

Global Humanitarian Overview, (2025). URL: https://humanitarianaction.info/document/global-humanitarian-overview-2025/article/ukraine-2?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Global standards and principles. URL: https://www.corecommitments.unicef.org/ccc-1-3

Harrison, L. (2020). Partnerships in humanitarian action. URL: https://www.cdacollaborative.org/blog/partnerships-in-humanitarian-action/

Keudel, O., Hatsko, V., Darkovich, A. (2024). Local Democracy and Resilience in Ukraine: Learning from Communities’ Crisis Response in War. Research report. № 33. 57 p. URL: https://icld.se/wp-content/uploads/ICLD_ResearchReport_33_2024-web.pdf

Localisation in Humanitarian Leadership. (2024). ICVA. A global NGO network for principled and effective humanitarian action. 40 p. URL:https://www.icvanetwork.org/uploads/2024/11/Localisation-in-Humanitarian-Leadership-

Report.pdf

Nolte, I.M. (2018). Interorganizational Collaborations for Humanitarian Aid: An Analysis of Partnership, Community, and Single Organization Outcomes. Public Performance & Management Review. Vol. 41 (3). P. 596–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1462212

Nurmala, N. (2018). Cross-sector humanitarian–business partnerships in managing humanitarian logistics: an empirical verification. International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 56 (21). P. 6842–6858. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1449977

Nyarko, G., Marnicio, A. (2024). Understanding leadership challenges faced by humanitarian aid workers: insights from the experiences of NNPHL training participants. Journal of International Humanitarian Action. Vol. 9 (15). P. 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-024-00158-5

Paulmann, J. (2013). Conjunctures in the History of International Humanitarian Aid During the Twentieth Century. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development. Vol. 4(2). P. 215–238.

https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2013.0016

Phuengpha, N., Supriyono, B. (2018). A model of collaborative management in disaster relief. MATEC Web of Conferences. Vol. 229. P. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201822902004

Turunen, S. (2020). Independence. Brill. URL: https://brill.com/display/book/9789004431140/BP000051.xml?body=fullhtml-60832

Ukraine Perceptions of localisation in the humanitarian response. (2023). Thematic report. 16 June 2023. URL: https://www.acaps.org/fileadmin/Data_Product/Main_media/20230616_acaps_thematic_report_ukraine_perceptions_of_localisation_in_the_humanitarian_re

sponse.pdf

Zhao, K., Yen, J., Maitland, C. (2009). A formal model for emerging coalitions under network influence in humanitarian relief coordination. Proceedings of the 2009 Spring Simulation Multiconference. P. 1 – 8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1639809.1639820

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Shevchenko, O. (2025). Between formal partnerships and real impact: how lack of autonomy weakens local participation in humanitarian programs. Social Work and Education, 12(3), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.25.3.1

Issue

Section

RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIAL POLITICS