Between Regulation and Recognition: Professional Identity and Licensing in Albanian Social Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.25.4.1Keywords:
social work, professional identity, licensing, regulation, recognition, AlbaniaAbstract
This article explores how licensing and regulation processes shape the professional identity of social workers in Albania, a post-socialist context where social work remains a relatively young profession. Drawing on the theoretical framework of recognition (Honneth, 1995) and professionalization theory, the study investigates how formal mechanisms of control intersect with social workers’ lived experiences of value, autonomy, and legitimacy. The qualitative research is based on semi-structured interviews with licensed practitioners across diverse institutional settings. Findings reveal ambivalent meanings attached to licensing: while it provides visibility, legitimacy, and a sense of belonging to a recognized profession, it also generates tensions related to bureaucratic control, unequal access, and limited professional agency. The article argues that the Albanian case illustrates the dual nature of professional regulation—as both a tool of governance and a vehicle for recognition. Implications are discussed for strengthening professional ethics, reflective supervision, and policy frameworks supporting social work education and practice in transitional societies.
References
Abramovitz, M., & Zelnick, J. (2018). The logic of privatization: The case of social work licensing. Social Work, 63(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swx056
Banks, S. (2016). Everyday ethics in professional life: Social work as ethical work. Ethics and Social Welfare, 10(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2015.1126623
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
British Association of Social Workers (BASW). (2021). Code of ethics. https://www.basw.co.uk/resources/basw-code-ethics
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Dominelli, L. (2012). Social work in a globalizing world (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Dominelli, L. (2017). Revitalizing professional identity: Social work in transition societies. European Journal of Social Work, 20(5), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1188782
Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). (2019). Standards of proficiency: Social workers in England. HCPC. https://www.hcpc-uk.org
Healy, L. M. (2005). International social work: Professional action in an interdependent world. Oxford University Press.
Hugman, R. (2010). Understanding international social work: A critical analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Matković, T. (2018). Social work education and licensing in Croatia: Between EU standards and local realities. European Journal of Social Education, 25(1), 55–70.
McLaughlin, K. (2012). Regulation and risk in social work: The General Social Care Council and the reform of social work. British Journal of Social Work, 42(5), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr110
National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2017). Social work licensure policy statement. NASW. https://www.socialworkers.org
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305
Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Reamer, F. G. (2018). Ethical standards in social work: A review of the NASW code of ethics (3rd ed.). NASW Press.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE.
Staniforth, B., Fouché, C., & Beddoe, L. (2014). Professional supervision in social work: Developing a culturally relevant approach for Aotearoa New Zealand. International Social Work, 57(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872813492728
World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Juliana Ajdini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Social Work and Education is an open access journal. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0