THE CONCEPT OF CULTURAL COMPETENCE OF THE DIGITAL GOVERNANCE SPECIALISTS WITHIN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Authors

  • Oleksandr Karpenko National Academy of Public Administration, under the President of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Kateryna Glubochenko V. O. Sukhomlynskyi Mykolaiv National University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.147106

Keywords:

Cultural Competence, Communication Skills, Digital Governance, Digital Governance Specialists, Cultural Compe-tence Assessment

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to define and analyze the concept of cultural competence of the digital governance specialists in the public administration science. The methodological bases of the research are the methods of observation and comparative analysis that allow to systematize important factors of cultural competence assessment of digital governance specialists. Scientific novelty of the article consists of the identification of the digital governance specialists’ cultural competence concept in public administration and defining the elements of its assessment. Conclusions. Cultural competence based on developed communication skills makes digital governance more effective, because corresponding knowledge and communication skills help service delivery agencies to solve the majority of internal and external conflicts within the public administration system. The main advantage of intercultural communication skills development is the improvement of services delivery process and the increase in efficiency of interactions between citizens and public administration institutes via mechanisms of digital governance. Considering global experience in digital governance implementation, conclusions and recommendations for Ukraine were made.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Karpenko, National Academy of Public Administration, under the President of Ukraine

DSc (Public Administration), Chairman of Information Policy and

Digital Technologies faculty

Kateryna Glubochenko, V. O. Sukhomlynskyi Mykolaiv National University

PhD in Public Administration

References

Цифрова адженда України – 2020 (“Цифровий порядок денний” – 2020) / Концептуальні засади (версія 1.0) // Hiteh-office. 2016. 90c.

Cross T. Services to minority populations / T. Cross // Cultural competence continuum. Focal Point. - 1988.- № 3. – P.1-9.

Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport. Digital government - maintaining the UK government as a world leader in serving its citizens online. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-strategy/6-digital-government-maintaining-the-uk-government-as-a-world-leader-in-serving-its-citizens-online

Heine S. J. Cultural psychology. Handbook of Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2010.

Hermann M. Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios: A literature review. Technische Universitat Dortmund. Working Paper. 2015. № 1. P.1-16.

Kovačić Z. J. The impact of national culture on worldwide eGovernment readiness. Informing Science Journal. 2005. №8. P.143-158.

OECD. Digital government strategies for transforming public services in the welfare areas. URL: http://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/Digital-Government-Strategies-Welfare-Service.pdf

Perri P. E-governance styles of political judgement in the Information Age polity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

Primm A.B. Race and ethnicity, mental health services and cultural competence in the criminal justice system: Are we ready to change? Community Mental Health Journal. 2005. №41(5). P. 557-569.

Sereni-Massinger C. Improving law enforcement cross cultural competencies through continued education. Journal of Education and Learning. 2016. №5(2). P. 258-264.

Singh A. A critical impulse to e-Governance in the Asia Pacific. New Delhi, India: Springer, 2013.

Digital Agenda for Ukraine – 2020 (“Digital Agenda” – 2020): Conceptual principles (version 1.0). (2016). Hiteh-office [in Ukrainian].

Cross, T. (1988). Services to minority populations. Cultural competence continuum. Focal Point, 3, 1-9 [in English].

Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport. (2017). Digital government - maintaining the UK government as a world leader in serving its citizens online. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-strategy/6-digital-government-maintaining-the-uk-government-as-a-world-leader-in-serving-its-citizens-online [in English].

Heine, S. J. (2010). Cultural psychology. In Handbook of Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, In. [in English].

Hermann, M., Pentek, T. & Otto, B. (2015). Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios: A literature review. Technische Universitat Dortmund. Working Paper, 1, 1-16 [in English].

Kovačić, Z. J. (2005). The impact of national culture on worldwide eGovernment readiness. Informing Sci-ence Journal, 8, 143-158 [in English].

OECD. (2016). Digital government strategies for transforming public services in the welfare areas. Re-trieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/Digital-Government-Strategies-Welfare-Service.pdf [in English].

Perri, P. (2004). E-governance styles of political judgement in the Information Age polity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English].

Primm, A.B., Osher, F.C. & Gomez, M.B. (2005). Race and ethnicity, mental health services and cultural competence in the criminal justice system: Are we ready to change? Community Mental Health Journal, 41, 5, 557-569 [in English].

Sereni-Massinger, C. & Wood, N. (2016). Improving law enforcement cross cultural competencies through continued education. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 258-264 [in English].

Singh, A. (2013). A critical impulse to e-Governance in the Asia Pacific. New Delhi, India: Springer [in Eng-lish].

Downloads

Published

2018-08-29

Issue

Section

Культурологія