THE CONCEPT OF CULTURAL COMPETENCE OF THE DIGITAL GOVERNANCE SPECIALISTS WITHIN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.147106Keywords:
Cultural Competence, Communication Skills, Digital Governance, Digital Governance Specialists, Cultural Compe-tence AssessmentAbstract
The purpose of this article is to define and analyze the concept of cultural competence of the digital governance specialists in the public administration science. The methodological bases of the research are the methods of observation and comparative analysis that allow to systematize important factors of cultural competence assessment of digital governance specialists. Scientific novelty of the article consists of the identification of the digital governance specialists’ cultural competence concept in public administration and defining the elements of its assessment. Conclusions. Cultural competence based on developed communication skills makes digital governance more effective, because corresponding knowledge and communication skills help service delivery agencies to solve the majority of internal and external conflicts within the public administration system. The main advantage of intercultural communication skills development is the improvement of services delivery process and the increase in efficiency of interactions between citizens and public administration institutes via mechanisms of digital governance. Considering global experience in digital governance implementation, conclusions and recommendations for Ukraine were made.
References
Цифрова адженда України – 2020 (“Цифровий порядок денний” – 2020) / Концептуальні засади (версія 1.0) // Hiteh-office. 2016. 90c.
Cross T. Services to minority populations / T. Cross // Cultural competence continuum. Focal Point. - 1988.- № 3. – P.1-9.
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport. Digital government - maintaining the UK government as a world leader in serving its citizens online. URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-strategy/6-digital-government-maintaining-the-uk-government-as-a-world-leader-in-serving-its-citizens-online
Heine S. J. Cultural psychology. Handbook of Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2010.
Hermann M. Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios: A literature review. Technische Universitat Dortmund. Working Paper. 2015. № 1. P.1-16.
Kovačić Z. J. The impact of national culture on worldwide eGovernment readiness. Informing Science Journal. 2005. №8. P.143-158.
OECD. Digital government strategies for transforming public services in the welfare areas. URL: http://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/Digital-Government-Strategies-Welfare-Service.pdf
Perri P. E-governance styles of political judgement in the Information Age polity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Primm A.B. Race and ethnicity, mental health services and cultural competence in the criminal justice system: Are we ready to change? Community Mental Health Journal. 2005. №41(5). P. 557-569.
Sereni-Massinger C. Improving law enforcement cross cultural competencies through continued education. Journal of Education and Learning. 2016. №5(2). P. 258-264.
Singh A. A critical impulse to e-Governance in the Asia Pacific. New Delhi, India: Springer, 2013.
Digital Agenda for Ukraine – 2020 (“Digital Agenda” – 2020): Conceptual principles (version 1.0). (2016). Hiteh-office [in Ukrainian].
Cross, T. (1988). Services to minority populations. Cultural competence continuum. Focal Point, 3, 1-9 [in English].
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport. (2017). Digital government - maintaining the UK government as a world leader in serving its citizens online. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-strategy/6-digital-government-maintaining-the-uk-government-as-a-world-leader-in-serving-its-citizens-online [in English].
Heine, S. J. (2010). Cultural psychology. In Handbook of Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, In. [in English].
Hermann, M., Pentek, T. & Otto, B. (2015). Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios: A literature review. Technische Universitat Dortmund. Working Paper, 1, 1-16 [in English].
Kovačić, Z. J. (2005). The impact of national culture on worldwide eGovernment readiness. Informing Sci-ence Journal, 8, 143-158 [in English].
OECD. (2016). Digital government strategies for transforming public services in the welfare areas. Re-trieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/Digital-Government-Strategies-Welfare-Service.pdf [in English].
Perri, P. (2004). E-governance styles of political judgement in the Information Age polity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan [in English].
Primm, A.B., Osher, F.C. & Gomez, M.B. (2005). Race and ethnicity, mental health services and cultural competence in the criminal justice system: Are we ready to change? Community Mental Health Journal, 41, 5, 557-569 [in English].
Sereni-Massinger, C. & Wood, N. (2016). Improving law enforcement cross cultural competencies through continued education. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(2), 258-264 [in English].
Singh, A. (2013). A critical impulse to e-Governance in the Asia Pacific. New Delhi, India: Springer [in Eng-lish].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).