Transformation of the Christian ethics of the beginning of the XXI century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2018.161201Keywords:
ethics of values, ethics of virtues, deontological ethics, narratology, modern Christian culture, relativism.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze paradigmatic transformations in modern Christian ethics. The methodology of the study is to use methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, as well as phenomenological and hermeneutical approaches. Scientific novelty consists in understanding the transformations of modern Christian ethics as a transition from deontology to aretology, which is connected with the crisis of theoretical and practical legitimization of Christian morality. It was found that in search of new legitimization, leading theorists of Christian ethics at the beginning of the 21 century Nicholas Thomas Wright and Richard B. Hays refer to the ethics of virtues as a paradigm for the development of diverse strategies of personal and collective morality. Conclusions. It has been proved that in modern Christian ethics there has been a transition to a postmodern way of legitimizing moral norms, which is connected with the development of bible studies, theological hermeneutics, ethics of virtues, narratology. It is proved that the concepts of modern Christian ethics are determined by two metanarratives: the biblical history, which involves the participation of Christian communities in the eschatological celebration of good; the vision of the modern ethicsofthelawinallitsvarietiesasadeviationthatovercomesthepost-secularstateofsociety.It is shown that both narratives are associated with significant utopian exaggerations about the present and future of society. De facto, the Christian ethic of the beginning of the 21 century has become a means of legitimizing the most diverse moral practices of Christian communities since the prerequisites of the ethical theory in narratology provide for unlimited freedom in the choice of moral strategies of behavior at the level of development of the individual and society.
References
Артемьева О. Теоретические основания этики добродетели // Философия и этика: сборник научных трудов. К 70-летию акад. А.А.Гусейнова ; под ред. Р.Г.Апресяна. Москва: Альфа-М, 2009. С.433–445.
Дідківський А. А. Православна етика: гуманістичний потенціал та історичні форми легітимізації. PhD thesis. Житомир: Житомирський державний університет імені Івана Франка, 2015. 223с.
Макинтайр А. После добродетели/ [пер.сангл. В.В.Целищева]. Екатеринбург: Деловаякнига. 2000. 384 с.
Пінкерс С. Джерела християнської моралі: її метод, зміст та історія/ Комент., прим., бібліогр. матеріа-ли, [наук. ред.] О. Хома, Е. Чухрай ; [пер. з фр. : О. Панич та ін.]. Київ : Дух і Літера, 2013. 605 с.
Райт Н.Т. Новый Завет и народ Божий /Пер.с англ. Н.Холмогоровой. Черкассы: Коллоквиум, 2013. 704 с.
Хейз Р. Этика Нового Завета / Пер. с англ. Г.Ястребова. Москва : ББИ, 2005. 712с.
Шохин В. Четвертый путь? К этическому обоснованию агатологии // Этическая мысль. Москва : Инсти-тут философии РАН, 2013. Вып. 13. С. 47–75.
Milbank J. Postmodern Critical Augustianism: A short Summa in Forty-two Responses to Unasked Questions. Modern Theology. 1991. 7:3 April. P.265-278.
Zagzebski L. Exemplarist Virtue Theory. Metaphilosophy, 2010. Vol. 41. P.41–57.
Гаєвська Т. Генеза та становлення феномена моралі. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. Київ : Міленіум, 2013. № 4. С.236-242.
Artemyeva, O. (2009). Theoretical grounds for the ethics of virtue, in: Filosofiya i etika: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. K 70-letiyu akad. A.A.Guseynova. Moscow : Institut filosofii RAN, 433–445 [in Russian].
Didkivskyy, A. A. (2015). Orthodox ethics: humanistic potential and historical forms of legitimization.. PhD thesis. Zhytomyr: Zhytomyrskyy derzhavnyy universytet imeni Ivana Franka [in Ukrainian].
MacIntyre, A. (2000). After virtue [per. s angl. V. V. Tselishcheva], Yekaterinburg : Delovaya kniga [in Russian].
Pínkers, S. (2013). Sources of Christian morality: its method, content and history. Kyiv: Dukh í Lítera [in Ukrainian].
Wright, N. T. (2013). The New Testament and the People of God. Cherkassy : Kollokvium [in Russian].
Hays, R. (2005) Ethics of the New Testament. Moscow [in Russian].
Shokhin, V. (2013). The fourth way? To the ethical justification of agathology, in: Eticheskaya mysl'. Issue 13. Moscow : Institut filosofii RAN, 47–75 [in Russian].
Milbank, J. (1991). Postmodern Critical Augustianism: A short Summa in Forty-two Responses to Unasked Questions. Modern Theology. 7:3 April. 265–278 [in English].
Zagzebski, L. (2010). Exemplarist Virtue Theory, in: Metaphilosophy, 41, 41–57 [in English].
Gaevska, T. (2013). Genesis and the emergence of the phenomenon of morality. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv. Kyiv: Millennium, 4, 236-242 [in Ukraine].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).