AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL OF TOTALITARIAN SOCIETY (THROUGH THE EXAMPLE OF LEIGH BRACKETT’S “BOOK OF SKAITH”)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2019.166535Keywords:
anti-utopia, science fiction, totalitarianism, Leigh BrackettAbstract
The purpose of the research is to go beyond the strict borders of the genre of anti-utopia and to study the depiction of dystopic social system in a work of the science fiction. The main methods are hermeneutics and the comparative analysis. The scientific novelty. For the first time Leigh Brackett’s work is researched as an example of sociological and culturological modelling with considerable prognostic potential. Conclusion. In Brackett’s “The Book of Skaith” we see not a typical for anti-utopia “island” society, but a whole planet. This implies a whole new level of complexity. The author shows how the changes in environment influence different interconnected societies. This modelling of civilization under pressure can be seen as an implicitly-culturological study of political, social and cultural dynamics. An important ethical topic concerns the degradation of the best ideological principles if they are not adapted to the changing reality. The image of society, where social programs breed a considerable strata of people, who never worked is disturbingly relevant. Almost all depicted social groups develop such protective reaction to the crisis, as the search for oblivion. Brackett shows different variants of escaping from the unbearable knowledge of the impending catastrophe: hedonistic attempts of “living in a moment”, totalitarian religions etc. Even such intellectual activity as studying history can become an obsessive immersion in the past as a way of escaping the present. That is why “The Book of Skaith” can be viewed as a warning about the consequences of some tendencies of the contemporary (late ХХ – early ХХI ct.) civilization. In this it differs from many anti-utopias, whose futuristic entourage masks the habit of depiction of the already well-known social ills, and in the forms more typical for the first half of the XX ct., than for our own days.
References
Войтина Н. М. До проблеми визначення жанру утопії та антиутопії. Волинь філологічна: текст і контекст. : Зб. наук. пр. Вип. 6: У 2-х ч. Ч. ІІ. Луцьк: РВВ “Вежа” Волин. нац. ун-ту ім. Лесі Українки, 2008. С. 33 – 39.
Забужко О. Філософія української ідеї та європейський контекст: франківський період. К. : Факт, 2009. 156 с.
Мартынов Д. К рассмотрению семантической эволюции понятия «утопия». Вопросы философии. 2009. № 5. С. 162-171.
Приходько А. М. Жанр "фэнтези" в литературе Великобритании проблема утопического мышления : дис. ... канд. филол. наук : 10.01 03. М., 2001. 199 с.
Шадурский М.И. Литературная утопия от Мора до Хаксли: Проблемы жанровой поэтики и семиосферы. Обретение острова. М.: Изд-во ЛКИ, 2007. 160 с.
Brackett L. The Book of Skaith. New York: Nelson Doubleday, 1976. 468 p.
Voityna N. (2008). About the problem of defining the genre of Utopia and Anti-utopia. The Philological Volyn’. Lutsk: Vezha [in Ukrainian].
Zabuzhko O. (2009) The Philosophy of Ukrainian National Idea in European Context: Franko’s Period. Kyiv: Fact [in Ukrainian].
Martynov D. (2009). On the Semantical Evolution of the Notion of Utopi. Problems of Philosophy [in Russian].
Prykhodko A. (2001). The Genre of Fantasy in the British Literature: the Problem of Utopic Thinking. Candidate’s thesis. Moscow: MGOPU [in Russian]
Shadurskiy M. (2007) Literary Utopia from More to Huxley: The Problems of the Genre Poetics and Semiosphere. Moscow: LKI Press [in Russian].
Brackett L. The Book of Skaith. New York: Nelson Doubleday, 1976 [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).