Thematization of Cultural Practices in the Scientific Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2019.166537Keywords:
practice, cultural practices, cultural turns, cultural senses, scientific traditionAbstract
Purpose of the Article. The purpose of the article is to study the existed theories of the concepts of «practice» and «cultural practices». In addition, the author analyses their understanding in the context of the modification and transformation of the components of culture. Methodology. The methodology of the research consists of the general scientific principles of systematization and generalization. They allow the author to determine and substantiate the existing theory and the conceptual approaches to the understanding of the meaning of the concepts of «practice» and «cultural practice». The axiological approach gives us an opportunity to find out certain unanimity in the sense of the person’s belonging to the various cultural practices in the studied theories. The analytical method helps us to reveal the conceptual foundations for further scientific perspectives. Scientific Novelty. The scientific novelty of the article consists in the study of the theories, concerning the understanding of the concepts of «practice» and «cultural practice», and the analysis of their semantic range of the considered concepts, their semantics, and content. Conclusion. The studied theories have allowed the author to state that the main subject of any practice is a person, who forms a practice as the particular activities, which are based on his/her individual characteristics such as behavior, education, creativity, art, leisure, and mental connection, etc. One of the main intentions of the cultural practices is the conservation, transfer and further development of the system of meanings, ideas that are objectified in the knowledge and manifested in the symbolic forms. The thematization of the cultural practices requires the clarification of their content and includes the development of a conceptual-categorical apparatus. It allows theoretically the author to describe the development of the algorithm for their implementation as the totality of actions, techniques, methods, verbal and non-verbal communication as a necessary gesture accompaniment, taking into account the specifics of spatial locals, toposes and their realization.
References
Бауман З., Донкіс Л. Плинне зло. Життя без альтернатив. Київ : Дух і Літера, 2017. 216 с.
Бахманн-Медик Д. Культурные повороты. Новые ориентиры в науках о культуре / пер. с нем. С. Ташкенова. Москва: Новое литературное обозрение, 2017. 504 с.
Вахштайн В.С. «Практика» vs. «фрейм»: альтернативные проекты исследования повседневного мира. Социологическое обозрение. 2008. Т. 7. № 1. С. 65–95.
Вахштайн В. Социология повседневности и теория фреймов. СПб. : Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2011. 334 с.
Волков В. В., Хархордин О. В. Теория практик. СПб.: Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2008. 298 с.
Дьяков А. А. Философия и практика: было ли прошлое, есть ли настоящее, будет ли будущее? Наука. Философия. Общество : материалы V Российского философского конгресса: В 3 т. Новосибирск, 2009. Т. I. 531 с.
Дьяков А. Теория практик: Социально-философский потенціал концепции. Известия Саратовского университета. Философия, Психология. 2011. № 1. С. 9–12.
Копієвська О. Р. Трансформаційні процеси в культурних практиках України: глобальний, глокальний контекст та локальні особливості (кінець ХХ – початок ХХІ ст.) : дис. … д-ра культурології : 26.00.06. Київ, 2018. 487 с.
Кримський С. Б. Запити філософських смислів. Київ : Видавець ПАРАПАН, 2003. 240 с.
Мєднікова Г. С. Концепт «культурні практики» і його роль у трансформації сучасної культури. Науковий часопис Національного педагогічного університету імені М. П. Драгоманова. Сер. 7 : Релігієзнавство. Культурологія. Філософія : зб. наук. праць. Київ: НПУ імені М. П. Драгоманова, 2017. Вип. 37(50). С. 30–39.
Настояща К. В. Атрибуції поняття практики: колізії означення і пошуки верифікацій // Грані : науково-теоретичний альманах. 2018. Т. 21. № 1. С. 56–62.
Рикер П. История и истина / пер. с фр. СПб. : Алетейя, 2002 . 400 с.
Смирнов А. В. Дискурсивные практики как инструмент исследования повседневности // Вестник Орловского государственного университета. Сер. Новые гуманитарные исследования. 2012. № 2 (22). С. 264–267.
Тейлор Ч. Джерела себе / пер. з англ. К. : Дух і Літера, 2005. 696 с.
Шинкаренко О. В. «Культурний поворот» як запит до культурології // Українські культурологічні студії. 2018. № 1(2). С. 55–59.
Bauman Z., Donkis L. (2017). Flood evil. Life without alternatives. Kyiv : Duh i Litera [in Ukrainian].
Bachmann-Medic D. (2017). Cultural Turns. New landmarks in the science of culture. Moscow : Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [in Russian].
Vakhshtayn V.S. (2008). "Practice" vs. "Frame": alternative projects for exploring the everyday world. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, 7, 1, 65-95 [in Russian].
Vakhshtayn V. (2011). Sociology of everyday life and the theory of frames. St. Petersburg : European University in St. Petersburg [in Russian].
Volkov V.V., Kharkhordin O.V. (2008). Theory of Practitioners. St. Petersburg : European University in St. Petersburg [in Russian].
Dyakov A.A. (2009). The philosophy and the practice: was there the past, is there the present, will the future be? Nauka. Filosofiya. Obshchestvo : materialy V Rossiyskogo filosofskogo kongressa : in 3 vol. Novosibirsk, 1 [in Russian].
Dyakov A. (2011). Theory of Practitioners: The Social and Philosophical Potential of the Concept. Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universiteta : Filosofiya. Psihologiya, 1, 9-12 [in Russian].
Kopievska O. R. Transformation processes in the cultural practices of Ukraine: global, global context and local features (end of the XX - beginning of the XXI century): Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv : NAKKKiM, 2018 [in Ukrainian].
Krymskyi S. B. (2003). Queries of philosophical meanings. Kyiv : PARAPAN [in Ukrainian].
Mednikova G. S. (2017). The concept of «cultural practices» and its role in the transformation of contemporary culture. Naukovyi chasopys Natsionalnogo pedogogichnogo universytetu. Kyiv : NPU M.P. Dragomanov, 37 (50). 30-39 [in Ukrainian].
Nastoiashcha K. V. (2018). Attribution of the notion of practice: conflicts of definition and searches for veri-fications. Grani : naukovo-teoretychnyi almanah, 21, 1, 56-62 [in Ukrainian].
Riker P. (2002). History and Truth. St. Petersburg : Aleteia [in Russian].
Smirnov A. V. (2012). Discursive practices as a tool for the study of everyday life. Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2 (22), 264-267 [in Russian].
Taylor Ch. (2005). Sources for herself. Kyiv : Duh i Litera [in Russian].
Shynkarenko O. V. (2018). "Cultural turns" as a request for culturology. Ukrainski kulturologichni studii, 1 (2), 55-59 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
