MULTICULTURALISM AS THE MOST CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH TO THE PROSPECTS OF CIVILIZATION

Authors

  • Larysa Novak-Kalyayeva Lviv Regional Institute for Public Administration of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine,
  • Anatoliy Rachynskyi National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2019.166539

Keywords:

culture, values, identity, human rights, priorities of sustainable development, social and intercultural interaction

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to rationalize human rights as a prevailing tendency in the development of modern society and governance. In particular, the main aspects of the problematic in their dialectical interconnection are actualized as well as the processes of formation of the principles of social interaction in the historical retrospective are outlined. Methodology. The general research strategy is based on the methodology of public administration: on the basis of historical, axiological and dialectical methods, cause-effect relationships between social processes and phenomena have been substantiated, the result of which has been the introduction of human rights methodology, including the concept of sustainable development. Scientific novelty consists in expanding theoretical representations of multiculturalism as the most constructive approach to the prospects of civilization. The role of informational and technological influences on society and government as well as the importance of protecting the universality of the information space, its integrity and openness are emphasized. It is consistently held that human rights create a powerful democratic potential for constructive change, development, and progress of society and governance on the basis of social interaction. Conclusions. It is substantiated that interconnection and interaction of human rights and sustainable development imperatives have a significant effect on the democratization of public life and ensuring the rule of law not only at the local but also at the national and global levels of government. It has been proved that the problem and tension between the universality of human rights and the cultural interconnection of identities in a multicultural world are manifested by the crisis in the contemporary world humanitarian space and specific approaches to its solution. Far controversial understanding of human rights by societies of different continents, confessions, traditions, and cultures, which has led to the denial of the cultural conditionality of human rights, has been established.

Author Biographies

Larysa Novak-Kalyayeva, Lviv Regional Institute for Public Administration of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor of the Department of  Public Administration

Anatoliy Rachynskyi, National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor of the Department of  Public Administration and Public Service

References

Höffe O. (1998). Transzendentaler Tausch. Eine Legitimations-figur für Menschenrechte?, in: Stefan Gosepath/Georg Lohmann (Hg.), Philosophie der Menschenrechte 6. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Verlag) [in English].

Leuenberger D.Z. & Wakin M. (2007). Sustainable Development in Public Administration Planning: An Exploration of Social Justice, Equity, and Citizen Inclusion – Administrative Theory & Praxis Vol. 29. Issue 3. P. 394–411 [in English].

Lévi-Strauss C. Structural Anthropology (2008). Basic Books, Inc. New York [in English].

Novak-Kalyayeva L. (2012). The sources of forming of human rights concept in the process of European state formation. “Democratic governance” Academic papers collection. Issue 9. [in English].

Novak-Kalyayeva L., Kuczabski A., Sydorchuk O., Fersman N. & Zemlinskaia T. (2018). Conceptualizing of Priorities in the Dynamics of Public Administration Contemporary Reforms. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 12. No 6. Pp. 637–647. [in English].

Okin S.M., Nussbaum M., Cohen J. & Howard M. (1999). Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. [in English].

Rachynski A. (2017). Influence of world transformational processes on the development of political-managerial elite in Ukraine. Public Management Studio. Vol. 2. [in Ukrainian].

Spangenberg J. (2016). Hot Air or Comprehensive Progress? A Critical Assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development. Vol. 25. Issue 4. pp. 311–321. [in English].

Statement on Human Rights by the Executive Board, American Anthropological Association, American Anthropologist, New Series. Vol. 49. No. 4. Part 1 (Oct.–Dec., 1947). pp. 539–543. [in English].

IISD’s Post-2015 Development Agenda Reporting. Negotiations and Processes, available at: http://enb.iisd.org/post2015. [in English].

Downloads

Published

2019-01-22

Issue

Section

Культурологія