MULTICULTURALISM AS THE MOST CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH TO THE PROSPECTS OF CIVILIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2019.166539Keywords:
culture, values, identity, human rights, priorities of sustainable development, social and intercultural interactionAbstract
The purpose of this article is to rationalize human rights as a prevailing tendency in the development of modern society and governance. In particular, the main aspects of the problematic in their dialectical interconnection are actualized as well as the processes of formation of the principles of social interaction in the historical retrospective are outlined. Methodology. The general research strategy is based on the methodology of public administration: on the basis of historical, axiological and dialectical methods, cause-effect relationships between social processes and phenomena have been substantiated, the result of which has been the introduction of human rights methodology, including the concept of sustainable development. Scientific novelty consists in expanding theoretical representations of multiculturalism as the most constructive approach to the prospects of civilization. The role of informational and technological influences on society and government as well as the importance of protecting the universality of the information space, its integrity and openness are emphasized. It is consistently held that human rights create a powerful democratic potential for constructive change, development, and progress of society and governance on the basis of social interaction. Conclusions. It is substantiated that interconnection and interaction of human rights and sustainable development imperatives have a significant effect on the democratization of public life and ensuring the rule of law not only at the local but also at the national and global levels of government. It has been proved that the problem and tension between the universality of human rights and the cultural interconnection of identities in a multicultural world are manifested by the crisis in the contemporary world humanitarian space and specific approaches to its solution. Far controversial understanding of human rights by societies of different continents, confessions, traditions, and cultures, which has led to the denial of the cultural conditionality of human rights, has been established.
References
Höffe O. (1998). Transzendentaler Tausch. Eine Legitimations-figur für Menschenrechte?, in: Stefan Gosepath/Georg Lohmann (Hg.), Philosophie der Menschenrechte 6. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Verlag) [in English].
Leuenberger D.Z. & Wakin M. (2007). Sustainable Development in Public Administration Planning: An Exploration of Social Justice, Equity, and Citizen Inclusion – Administrative Theory & Praxis Vol. 29. Issue 3. P. 394–411 [in English].
Lévi-Strauss C. Structural Anthropology (2008). Basic Books, Inc. New York [in English].
Novak-Kalyayeva L. (2012). The sources of forming of human rights concept in the process of European state formation. “Democratic governance” Academic papers collection. Issue 9. [in English].
Novak-Kalyayeva L., Kuczabski A., Sydorchuk O., Fersman N. & Zemlinskaia T. (2018). Conceptualizing of Priorities in the Dynamics of Public Administration Contemporary Reforms. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 12. No 6. Pp. 637–647. [in English].
Okin S.M., Nussbaum M., Cohen J. & Howard M. (1999). Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. [in English].
Rachynski A. (2017). Influence of world transformational processes on the development of political-managerial elite in Ukraine. Public Management Studio. Vol. 2. [in Ukrainian].
Spangenberg J. (2016). Hot Air or Comprehensive Progress? A Critical Assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development. Vol. 25. Issue 4. pp. 311–321. [in English].
Statement on Human Rights by the Executive Board, American Anthropological Association, American Anthropologist, New Series. Vol. 49. No. 4. Part 1 (Oct.–Dec., 1947). pp. 539–543. [in English].
IISD’s Post-2015 Development Agenda Reporting. Negotiations and Processes, available at: http://enb.iisd.org/post2015. [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).