An administrative culture of management is in the epoch of industrial society

Authors

  • Elena Kovalenko National Academy of Supervisory Frame of Culture and Arts, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2019.166897

Keywords:

the administrative culture of management, industrial society, features

Abstract

The purpose of the article is a theoretical analysis of the administrative culture of management which will be instrumental in enriching of humanitarian science new knowledge about becoming and development of a culture of management in the epoch of industrial society. Methodology of research is the dialectical principle of cognition, sociocultural and historical approaches of the systems, fundamental positions of theory and history of management culture. The scientific and interdisciplinary methods of research are used: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison and formalization. The scientific novelty of the got results consists of exposure and generalization of features of the culture of administrative management of epoch of industrialism. Conclusions. In accordance with this culture, the organization is examined as an integral social organism, where every component takes strictly outlined place and functions which harmonious coordination is between. A man in the process of labor behaves rationally how requires a plan, and a manager executes the functions of system inspector. There are six functions in an organization: technical, commercial, financial, insurance, registration, administrative. To manage – means to provide their action. Administration – it only one of them. She is the sphere of activity of top management and includes such elements: foresight, organization, bossing, coordinating, control. Works of representatives of the theory of culture of administrative management lie in the basis of modern culture and art of management. They are united by aspiring to the creation of the code of universal principles on the basis of which it is possible it would be to make the best administrative decisions. It is fourteen principles H. Fayol, ten principles of L. Gulick, three principles of J. Mooney and A. Reiley, and also a vault of synthetic rules of L. Urwick, which integrate all these principles. Today they are examined as fundamental bases of the art of management.

Author Biography

Elena Kovalenko, National Academy of Supervisory Frame of Culture and Arts

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Art Management and Event Technologies

References

Друкер П. Управление в обществе будущего. Пер. с англ. Москва : Вильямс, 2007. 320 с.

Мартинишин Я. М., Коваленко Є. Я. Смисли в культурі управління. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2017. № 4. С. 26–31.

Мартинишин Я. М., Коваленко Є. Я. Формування сучасної системи управління життєдіяльністю сус-пільства. Вісник Київського національного університету культури і мистецтв. Серія: Менеджмент соціокультурної діяльності. 2018. Вип. 1. С. 7–24.

Мартинишин Я. М., Хлистун О. С. Феномен ідей в управлінні життєдіяльністю суспільства. Вісник Київського національного університету культури і мистецтв. Серія: Менеджмент соціокультурної діяльності. 2018. Вип. 2. С. 7–25.

Минцберг Г. Создание эффективной организации. Пер. с англ. Санкт-Петербург : Питер, 2011. 502 с.

Файоль А. Общее и промышленное управление. Пер. с фр. Москва : Контроллинг, 1992. 112 с.

Gulick L. Administrative Reflections from World War II. Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press, 1948. 139 р.

Gulick L. Notes on the Theory of Organization. Papers on the Science of Administration. New York : Institute of Public Administration, 1937. P. 3–45.

Mooney J., Reiley A. Onward Industry!: The Principles of Organization and Their Significance to Modern Industry. New York : Harper & Brothers, 1931. 564 р.

Mooney J., Reiley A. The principles of organization. New York : Harper & Brothers, 1939. 223 р.

Urwick L. The elements of administration. New York : Harper & Brothers, 1944. 132 р.

Druker, P. (2007). Managing in the society of the future. (Trans. in Eng.). Moscow: Vil'iams [in Russian].

Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Kovalenko, Y. Y. (2017). The measures in culture of management. Visnyk Natsional'noi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kul'tury i mystetstv, 4, 26-31 [in Ukrainian].

Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Kovalenko, Y. Y. (2018). Formation of the modern system management of life society. Visnyk Kyivs'koho natsional'noho universytetu kul'tury i mystetstv. Seriia: Menedzhment sotsiokul'turnoi diial'nosti, 1, 7-24 [in Ukrainian].

Martynyshyn, Y. M., & Khlystun, Е. S. (2018). The phenomenon of ideas in the management activity of the society. Visnyk Kyivs'koho natsional'noho universytetu kul'tury i mystetstv. Seriia: Menedzhment sotsiokul'turnoi diial'nosti, 2, 7-25 [in Ukrainian].

Mintsberg, G. (2011). Creation of an effective organization. (Trans. Eng.) St. Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].

Faiol', A. (1992). General and Industrial Management. (Trans. in Fr.). Moscow: Kontrolling [in Russian].

Gulick, L. (1948). Administrative Reflections from World War II. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the Theory of Organization. Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, 3-45.

Mooney, J., & Reiley, A. (1931). Onward Industry!: The Principles of Organization and Their Significance to Modern Industry. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Mooney, J., & Reiley, A. (1939). The principles of organization. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Urwick, L. (1944). The elements of administration. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Published

2019-01-22

Issue

Section

Культурологія