MYTHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS: ASSEMBLY OF ANTIQUES MUSTS AND LAWS OF NEUROSTETICS

Authors

  • Victor Karpov
  • Natalia Syrotynska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2019.191333

Keywords:

primitive instincts, aesthetics, mythology, muses of antiquity, neuroesthetics, neuro art.

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to identify relationships between different periods based on the functioning of var- ious types of ancient arts and aesthetic senses that are defined by the laws of neuroesthetics. Methodology. The choice of research strategies in the study of the dynamics of changes in the socio-cultural structure determined the use of sys- tematic and integrated approaches, as well as a comparative method of research. We also use the prognostic aspect of the study, which involves building new value models and symbols that reflect the mechanisms of cultural and artistic de- velopment of humankind. The use of these research methods contributed to obtaining their theoretical results. The sci- entific novelty of the research lies in the formulation and development of an actual topic, which in the scientific dimen- sion has not received comprehensive and objective coverage and is being studied for the first time. The idea is justified, which is the understanding of the relationship of the laws of neuro art and ancient mythology to serve a more profound knowledge of the nature of aesthetic sensations. Conclusions. This type of creativity is characterized by the metaphors of language, as well as other arts that are related to the text. This form of creativity excites the imagination that in the most delicate strokes reflects a wide range of emotions, feelings, or events that brings pleasure at the time of perception of the subtleties of expression. Parallel rows of neuroesthetic laws and mythological Muses allow us to learn the relation- ship of the underlying mechanisms of aesthetic perception, which open up new meanings of human evolution. Such Pa r- allels define the critical role of art in mastering its potential and identify the aesthetic experience as an essential factor of self-knowledge and human development.

Key words: primitive instincts, aesthetics, mythology, muses of antiquity, neuroesthetics, neuro art.

References

References

Kaiku, M. (2017). The future of reason. Scientific works to comprehend, refine and strengthen intellect. Tr. A. Kamenets. Lviv. [In Ukrainian].

Nietzsche F. (2018). Contradiction in body and soul. Nietzsche F. Morning Star. Thoughts on moral judg- ments. Tr. V. Kebuladze. Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].

Ramachandran, V. (2015). Brain recounts: What makes us human, Moscow. [in Russian].

Karpov, V., Syrotynska, N. (2018). Neuroаrt in the context of creativitу. Bulletin of the National Academy of Culture and Arts, ғ 1, pp. 21 – 36. [in English].

Karpov V., Syrotynska N. (2019). Homo parvus mundus est: imagination as a tool of knowledge and for- mation of the world. Bulletin of the National Academy of Culture and Arts, ғ 1. pp. 226-230. [in English].

Kędziora, Ł. (2014). Niezauważona i rewolucyjna neurohistoria sztuki, sztuki. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici, 45, Toruń, pp. 223–252. [in Polish].

Zeki S. (1999). Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain., Oxford. [in English].

Downloads

Published

2019-09-22

Issue

Section

Мистецтвознавство