Regional institutions for the integration of culture post-Soviet space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2020.220074Keywords:
culture, politics, globalization, integration, post-soviet space, region.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to determine the cultural dimensions of the problem of regional integration processes in the post-Soviet space. Methodology. Research methods comprise the application of a comparative and systematic approach to the analysis of integration processes in the post-Soviet space. Metacultural and multicultural transformations are analyzed as a dialogue of cultures. The scientific novelty lies in revealing the role of regional integration institutions in the context of the formation of post-Soviet cultures. Local modules of integrative processes and cultural signs of integration are determined as an institution for the formation of the post-Soviet space in the context of the formation of political and economic relations. Conclusions. The results of the activities of regional institutions for the integration of independent countries are both counter-fractal, and harmonizing, synthesizing in nature. Implicitly dominant economic, cultural integration is the culture of everyday life, which encourages cultural dialogue in the informal dimension. The culture of everyday life became a unifying integrative factor afterward, which carries the mentality of gomo soveticus. The results of the agreements are explicitly recorded in the regulatory documents of the SDV, GUAM, SCO, and other regional modules of integration processes. Regional initiatives, in contrast to the globalist, integrative and disintegrative trends, are an active factor in harmonizing the intercultural dialogue of independent countries and have shown their viability.
References
Аmelchenko, N. (2006). The Problem of Social Integration of Ukraine in the Context of Understanding the Experience of the Orange Revolution. On the Other Side of Understanding: Ukraine and Europe after the Orange Revolution. Kyiv, 61-73 [in Ukrainian].
Andrushchenko, V.P. ( 2005). Organized society. The Problem of Organization and Public Self-Organization in the Period of Radical Transformation in Ukraine at the Turn of the Century: The Experience of Socio-Philosophical Analysis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Bystritsky, E. (1995). Post-communist philosophy of the post-communist er. Political science of post-communism. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Gumenyuk, T.K., Legenky Yu.G. (2019). Postcommunist culture in the mirror of the metamodern: a discursive analysis. Bulletin of the National Academy of Art and Culture Leaders, 3, 14-19 [in Ukrainian].
Pivovar E.I. (2010). Post-Soviet Space: Alternatives to Integration. Historical sketch. St. Petersburg: Aletheia [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).