GENERALIZATION OF ARTS: POETRY AND ILLUSTRATION

Authors

  • Olena Gonchar
  • Oleksandr Soboliev
  • Liudmyla Lytvyniuk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2020.220090

Keywords:

work of art, illustration, poetic text, functional approach, generalization, perception.

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to define the conception of perception of poetic texts and illustrations by generalizing these forms of arts. The methodology is based on the functional approach to verbal and non-verbal text comprehension. The scientific novelty of the work lies in understanding the process of generalization of two forms of arts, such as poetry and illustration that proves the idea of their twofold nature. The developed typology of poetic texts with a basic parameter “antithesis” and classification of the forms of illustrations are founded on the correlation of projecting and conceptual principles of reality reflection in verbal and non-verbal texts, and on the explicitness degree of evaluative characteristics. Conclusion. The generalization of two forms of arts contributes to developing a course of action for an artist-illustrator. The significance of the scientific research results can clarify the elements of ambiguity, uncertainty, obscurity in the process of perception of any work of arts.

References

Berns, M. (1990). Functional Approaches to Linguistics. In: M. Berns. Contexts of Competence. Topics in Language and Linguistics. Springer, Boston, MA Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9838-8_1 [in English].

Jacobs, A. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 186. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhurn.2015.00186 [in English].

Halliday, M.A.K. (1990.) An Introduction to Functional grammar. London : Edward Arnold [in English].

Leder, H., Oeberst, A. & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation aesthetic judgement. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811 [in English].

Vygotskiy, L. S. (1986). Psychology of art. Moscow : Iskusstvo [in Russian].

Hegel, G. (1999). Lectures on Aesthetics. (pp. 204). St. Petersburg : Nauka [in Russian].

Zalevskaya, A. A. (1981). On an integrated approach to the study of patterns of functioning of the human language mechanism. In A. A. Zalevskaya. Psycholinguistic studies in the field of vocabulary and phonetics. Kalinin [in Russian].

Surkov, A. A. (Ed.). (1966). Short literary encyclopedia. (Vol. 3), (pp. 657). Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya [in Russian].

Levitskiy, A. E. (2010). Functional approach in modern linguistics. Studia Linguistica. (Issue 4), (pp. 31–38). Kyiv: Kyiv: VPTs «Kyivskyi universytet» [in Russian].

Lіsіna, O. V. (1998). Comparative analysis of vocabulary of idiostyles by S. Yesenin and Imaginists. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv: KhDPU im. H. S. Skovorody [in Ukrainian].

Lotman, Yu. M. (1998). About art. St. Petersburg : «Iskusstvo — SPB» [in Russian].

Pravdin, M. N. (1991). Problem of abstract and concrete in thinking and language. Moscow : Vdokhnovenie [in Russian].

Sorokin, Yu. A. (1985). Psycholinguistic problems of perception and evaluation of the text. Moscow [in Russian].

Stepanchenko, I. I. (1991). Sergey Esenin’s poetic language (the lexicon analysis. Kharkiv: N. ed. [in Russian].

Shynkaruk, V. І. et al. (Eds.). Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. Kyiv: Abris [in Ukrainian].

Issue

Section

Artistic space: history and modernity