Free jazz as the space of freedom in music
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2020.220573Keywords:
free jazz, freedom, improvisation, academic music.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to reveal the specifics of the formation of free jazz, emphasizing its essential features and outlining the ways of interaction with other areas of musical art, which are manifestations of freedom of the direction. The scientific methodology involves the use of a comparative method to illuminate the features of the appearance of free jazz stylistics in the works of various musicians. The use of analytical and systematic approaches is appropriate for the selection of the essential features of the direction and their generalization. Scientific novelty. The features of free jazz as a direction corresponding to the aesthetics of postmodernism are revealed. His ability to interact with academic and ethnic music is underlined. From these areas, free-jazz borrows nonconventional ways of sound production, techniques of the game, tools, and principles of composition arrangement. Conclusions. Free jazz is one of the promising trends in contemporary musical art. His essential features are the desire for freedom - in a modal, rhythmic, structural relation. An extremely large influence on the formation of free jazz improvisations was academic music. It is the interaction with the avant-garde musical culture that introduces jazz in the rejection of tonality as such that it can be replaced by polytonality, atonality, or even elements of serialism. An important feature of free jazz is the desire to reveal the freedom of the artist, which can be manifested in the total improvisation of works, borrowing elements of ethnic music, actionist, and performance. Often, free-jazz is perceived as a piece of protest music that is acutely social in nature and directed against the policies of individual leaders or parties.
References
Volkov, A.V. (2014). Free Jazz - the Highest Form of Playing Music. Interview with Leo Records label founder Leo Feigin. Retrieved from https://www.zvuki.ru/ R/P/33799/ [in Russian].
Gorbunova, L.I. (2011). Postmodern as a trend of development of the culture of the XX century. Vestnik MGTU. Vol. 14, №2, pp. 265-271. [in Russian].
Olendarʹov, V. M. (1995). Domestic jazz and the problem of style. Extended abstract of the candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: KDC named by P.Chaikovskyi [in Ukrainian].
Symonenko, V. (1981). The Lexicon of jazz. Kyiv: Muzychna Ukrayina [in Ukrainian].
Free jazz as a protest: This Saxophone Kills Fascists. Retrieved from https://katacult.com/fri-dzhaz-kak-protiest-this-saxophone-kills-fascists [in Russian].
Baskerville, J. D. (1994). Free Jazz: A Reflection of Black Power Ideology. Journal of Black Studies. Vol. 24. No. 4, pp. 484-497. [in English].
Jost, Ekkehard. 1994. Free Jazz. Nw York: Da Capo Press [in English].
Kemfeld, Barry (editor). 1991. The Blackwell Guide to Recorded Jazz. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers [in English].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).