Theoretical confirmation of prospectivity of application of metabolitic complexes of lactobacilli and saccharomycetes in the fight antibiotic resistance of bacteria

Authors

  • O. Yu. Isayenko Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology,
  • Ye. M. Babich Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology,
  • T. V. Gorbach Kharkiv National Medical University,
  • S. Yu. Pivnenko Kharkiv Regional Laboratory Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine,
  • T. O. Antusheva Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology,

Keywords:

lactobacilli, saccharomycetes, multidrug–resistant microorganisms, potentiation of antibiotics, combinations metabolites with antibiotics, synergistic antibacterial activities.

Abstract

Introduction. The global problem is the increase in the number of infectious diseases caused by antibiotic–resistant pathogens. Measures to control these microorganisms should be aimed at preventing the formation of antibiotic–resistant populations of microorganisms and at inhibiting already established resistant populations. The aim of the work is to substantiate the perspective of using metabolic complexes of lactobacilli and saccharomycetes to control antibiotic resistance of bacteria. Material & methods. Cellular structures of lactobacilli and saccharomycetes (L / S) were received by irradiation with low–frequency ultrasonic waves (generator G3–109) of suspensions of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (from symbiotic PREEMA®, Schonen, Switzerland) and Saccharomyces boulardii (from probiotic drug BULARDI®, Schonen, Switzerland). The metabolites of L. rhamnosus GG (ML) and S. boulardii (MS) were received in their own cellular structures. The combination of lactobacilli with saccharomycetes (MLS) and metabolites of saccharomycetes (LS) in the cellular structures of lactobacilli. Suspensions of microorganisms (resistant to antibiotics) gram–negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa PR, Acinetobacter baumannii PR, Klebsiella pneumoniae PR, Lelliottia amnigena (Enterobacter amnigenus) PR, gram–positive Staphylococcus aureus PR, Staphylococcus haemoliticus PR, Enterococcus faecalis PR, Corynebacterium xerosis PR, the cultures Corynebacterium spp. tox +, Streptococcus viridans, Streptococcus pneumoniaе with an optical density of 5,0 units on the McFarland scale (Densi–La–Meter (PLIVA–Lachema Diagnostika, (Czech Republic)) was added to L / S / ML / MLS / MS / LS (experimental samples) or to 0.9% sodium chloride solution (control samples) in a ratio of 1: 1. All samples were incubated for 1 hour at a temperature of + 35 ± 1 ° C, then the optical density was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland. Sowing was carried out on Mueller–Hinton medium. After disks with antibiotics (imipenem, vancomycin, cefotaxime, gentamicin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, amicil, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, ceftazidime , ceftriaxone, tetracycline, levofloxacin, amoxiclav, azithromycin), incubated (35 ± 1 ° C, 24 hours), measured the zones of growth retardation of microorganisms around the discs with antibiotics. Results & discussion. Potentiation of antimicrobial activity in the combined use of experimental samples with antibacterial drugs occurred in 88% of combinations with ML, 83 % – with MLS, 85 % – with MS, 73 % – with LS. Without increase in activity was substances with gentamicin, amicil, ampicillin, ceftazidime  were administered agains A. baumannii PR and with levofloxacin against S. aureus. Samples of ML over L (P = 0,005) and MLS over L (P = 0,008) had the advantage of a general increase in the diameters of the zones of growth inhibition of all tested pathogens. These results indicate a statistically significantly greater inhibition of growth of selected strains when combining antibiotics with metabolic complexes than with cellular structures. Excellent enhancement was observed when combining different antibacterial drugs with ML (on 5,5 ± 0,7, P <0,05), MLS (on 4,95 ± 0,6, P = 0,01) and MS (on 3,96±0,6, Р=0,001) relative to control. More inhibition of growth was observed of antibiotics with MLS than with MS (P = 0,02). A difference between the efficacies of the metabolic complexes ML and MLS was not found (P = 0,09). The presence of a large number of combinations of metabolic complex – antibiotic with the ability to therapeutically significant indicators to increase the antibacterial activity testifies the effectiveness of the combined use of metabolites L. rhamnosus GG and S. boulardii with different drugs. Conclusion. Theoretically confirmed of perspectivity of application of metabolic complexes of lactobacilli and saccharomycetes in the fight against antibiotic resistance of bacteria. Synergistic combinations of lactobacilli and saccharomycetes with antibiotics have been established. A therapeutically significant increase in their combined antimicrobial activity has been proven. This efficacy for different antibiotic–resistant strains indicates the perspectives of using metabolic complexes of lactobacilli and saccharomycetes to develop multifunctional antimicrobials preparations with consequence the possibility of inhibiting antibiotic resistance to already formed bacterial populations and at preventing the formation of antibiotic–resistant populations of microorganisms.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4382213

References

Anderson M., Mossialos, E. Strengthening implementation of antimicrobial resistance national action plans. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Eurohealth. 2020). 26 (‎1). 3 – 7. URL:https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332442

Eurohealth: tackling antimicrobial resistance. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Eurohealth. 2020. 26 (‎1). URL:https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331653

Renwick, M. & Mossialos, E.. Fostering clinical development and commercialisation of novel antibiotics. Eurohealth. 2020. 26 (‎1)‎. 8 – 11. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. URL:https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332478

WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. (2017). WHO, News Releas. URL: http://www.who.int/news–room/detail/27–02–2017–who–publishes–list–of–bacteria–for–which–new–antibiotics–are–urgently–needed.

Magiorakos A. P., Srinivasan A., Carey R. B., et al. Multidrug–resistant, extensively drug–resistant and pandrug–resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012. 18(3). 268–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469–0691.2011.03570.x

Strachunsky L. S., Belousov Yu. B., Kozlov S. N. Practical Guide to Anti-Infectious Chemotherapy. M.:Borges, 2002.379 р.

Nicolaou K., Rigol S. A brief history of antibiotics and select advances in their synthesis. J Antibiot. 2018. 71. 153–184. doi:10.1038/ja.2017.62

Plotkin L. L., Molchanova I. V., Chumakov P. G., et al. The infection caused by Acinetobacter baumannii in the intensive care units of a general hospital. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. Anestesiology and reanimatiology (rus). 2017. 14(6). 22–27. doi:10.21292/2078–5658–2017–14–6–22–27

UA. Patent. N. 126603. Isaуenko, O. Y., Knysh, O. V., Babych, Y. M., Poljans'ka, V. P., Zachepylo, S. V., Vashchenko, V. L., Kovalenko, O. I., & Balak, O. K. A method of obtaining a combination of metabolites of probiotic strains of fungi and bacteria.

UA. Patent. N. 123122. Isaуenko, O. Y., Knysh, O. V., Babych, Y. M., Kivva, F. V., Gorbach, T. V. & Balak, O. K. Method of obtaining metabolites of probiotic strains of bacteria.

Order of Ukraine On Approval of Methodical Instructions "Determination of Sensitivity of Microorganisms to Antibacterial Drugs" № 167. 2007

MIC and zone diameter distributions and ECOFFs. EUCAST. URL:https://www.eucast.org/mic_distributions_and_ecoffs/

Frickmann H., Klenk C., Warnke P., et al. Influence of probiotic culture supernatants on in vitro biofilm formation of staphylococci. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology. 2018. 8(4). 119-127. doi: 10.1556 / 1886.2018.00022

.Al–Malkey M. K., Munira Ch. I, Abo Al–Hur, F. J., et al. Antimicrobial effect of probiotic Lactobacillus spp. on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences. 2017. 3(10). 218–223

Isayenko O. Y., Knysh O. V., Babych Y. M., et al. Effect of disintegrates and metabolites of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Saccharomyces boulardii on biofilms of antibiotic resistant conditionally pathogenic and pathogenic bacteria. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 2019. 10(1). 3–8. https://doi.org/10.15421/021901

.Isayenko O. Y., Knysh O. V., Kotsar O. V., et al. Simultaneous and sequential influence of metabolite complexes of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Saccharomyces boulardii and antibiotics against poly-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems. 2020. 11(1). 139–145. doi:10.15421/022021

Isaуenko O. Yu., Kotsar O. V. Minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of antibacterial drugs separately and together with metabolic complexes of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Saccharomyces boulardii. Challenges of medical science and education: an experience of eu countries and practical introduction in Ukraine. «Baltija Publishing». 2020. DOI:10.30525/ 978-9934-588-64-8-9

Isayenko O. Y. Synergistic activity of filtrates of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Saccharomyces boulardii and antibacterial preparations against Corynebacterium spp. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems. 2019. 10(4). 445-456. doi:10.15421/021966

Sharma, J., Chauhan, D. S. Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by antibiotics and probiotics combinations – In vitro study. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2014. 4(6). 10–14.

Sharma J., Chauhan, D. S. In vitro study on the role of probiotic strains in potentiation of antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Pharmacy & Life Sciences. 2015. 6(1). 4161–4165.

Tong Z., Zhang Y., Ling J., et al. An in vitro study on the effects of nisin on the antibacterial activities of 18 antibiotics against Enterococcus faecalis. PLOS ONE. 2014. 9(2). e89209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089209

Brumfitt W., Salton M. R., & Hamilton–Miller J. M. Nisin, alone and combined with peptidoglycan–modulating antibiotics: activity against methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin–resistant enterococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002. 50. 731–734. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf190

Polak J., Della Latta P. & Blackburn P. In vitro activity of recombinant lysostaphin‐antibiotic combinations toward methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993.17. 265–270.

Graham S. Coote P .J. Potent, synergistic inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus upon exposure to a combination of the endopeptidase lysostaphin and the cationic peptide ranalexin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007. 59. 759–762.

Zabawa T. P., Pucci M. J., Parr T. R., Lister T. Treatment of Gram–negative bacterial infections by potentiation of antibiotics. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2016. 33. 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.05.005

Dosler S., Gerceker A. A. In vitro activities of nisin alone or in combination with vancomycin and ciprofloxacin against methicillin–resistant and methicillin–susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains. Chemotherapy. 2011. 57(6). 511–516. doi: 10.1159/000335598

Downloads

How to Cite

Isayenko, O. Y., Babich, Y. M., Gorbach, T. V., Pivnenko, S. Y., & Antusheva, T. O. (2020). Theoretical confirmation of prospectivity of application of metabolitic complexes of lactobacilli and saccharomycetes in the fight antibiotic resistance of bacteria. Annals of Mechnikov’s Institute, (4), 63–69. Retrieved from https://journals.uran.ua/ami/article/view/220153

Issue

Section

Research Articles