DOI: https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2018.160039

NEURO-ART IN THE CONTEXT OF CREATIVITY

Victor Karpov, Natalia Syrotynska

Abstract


Purpose of Article. The research aims to identify related art parallels between time -disparate cultural periods and innovative scientific discoveries that determine the mechanisms for the functioning of the mentioned links. Methodology. The choice of research strategies within studying the dynamics of changes in the socio-cultural system, identified the application of systemic and sophisticated approaches, as well as comparative and heuristic research methods, caused by the actual technological progress of the present time. In terms of the particular context, we use the prognostic aspect of the research, which involves the building of new value models and symbols reflecting social relations and cultural ones as well as artistic forms of modern civilization. The application of the mentioned methods of the research contributed to obtaining the own theoretical results. The scientific novelty of the study consists the formulation and development of an actual topic, which has not received comprehensive and objective coverage and is being investigated for the first time regarding the scientific dimension. The core idea is based on the fact that the results of understanding the essence of neuro-art can serve as an essential component in the context of contemporary cultural achievements study, as well as within the definition of value categories of the hyper-informational society. Conclusions. The development of the humankind culture demonstrates the presence of internal artistic parallels between separated time periods. It is noted that the similarity is inspired by the existence of internal mechanisms formed in the conditions of primitive society with its inherent expression of the eidetic imagery. The dynamics of the cultural trends is associated with the subconscious impulses of the human brain, which determined the importance for the introduction of such innovative terms as neuro-esthetics and neuro-art.


Keywords


eidetic imagery; primitive culture; information society; neuro-aesthetics; neuro-art.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Арнхейм Р. Искусство и визуальное восприятие. Москва, 1974. 386 с.

Біла А. Сюрреалізм. Київ, 2010. 208 с.

Гирц К. Интерпретация культур. Москва, 2004. 560 с.

Диди-Юберман Ж. То, что мы видим, то, что смотрит на нас / пер. А. Шестаков. Санкт-Петербург,

296 с.

Кайку М. Майбутнє розуму. Наукові спроби осягнути, вдосконалити і підсилити інтелект. Львів, 2017. 408 с.

Кияновська Л. Який сьогодні стиль надворі? // Наукові діалоги з Н.О.Герасимовою-Персидською. На-уковий вісник НМАУ ім. П.Чайковського. Вип. 19. Київ: НМАУ ім. П.Чайковського, 2017. С. 65–91.

Куценков П. Психология первобытного и традиционного искусства. Москва: Прогресс-Традиция,2007. 256 с.

Ларошфуко Ф. Мемуары. Максимы. Москва, 1974. 541 с.

Леви-Строс Ж.-К. Первобытное мышление. Москва, 1999. 392 с.

Леви-Строс Ж.-К. Структурная антропология. Москва, 2008. 554 с.

Личковах В. Трансгресія і художня творчість // В. Личковах. Дивосад культури: Вибрані статті з есте-тики, культурології, філософії мистецтва. Чернігів, 2006. С. 27-38.

Лотман Ю. Культура и информация. Статьи по семиотике культуры и искусства. Санкт-Петербург,

544 с.

Рамачандран В. Мозг рассказывает: Что делает нас людьми / Пер. с англ. Чепель Елена. Москва,2015. 422 с.

Сорока І. Підтекст як категорія сценічного мовлення: дис. … канд. мист.: 17.00.02. Київ: НАКККіМ,

163 с.

Степурко В. Вияви мистецької інтроверсії у творчості композиторів України другої половини XX – по-чатку XXI століття: дис. … канд. мист.: 26.00.01. Київ.: НАКККіМ, 2017. 204 с.

Ортега-И-Гассет Х. Восстание масс / Х. Ортeга-И-Гассет. Эстетика. Философия культуры. Москва

С. 309-349.

Усманова А. Умберто Эко: Парадоксы интерпретации. Минск, 2000. 200 с.

Hebb D. The Organization of Behavior. New York, 1949. 378 p.

Herskovits M. Cultural Anthropology. Knopf, 1955. 569 p.

Kluckhohn C. Culture and Behavior. New-York, 1962. 402 p.

Нейросеть научили распознавать эстетически привлекательные фото. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://bykvu.com/bukvy/81954-nejroset-nauchili-raspoznavat-esteticheski-privlekatelnye-foto

Интерфейсы взаимодействия человеческого мозга и компьютера могут изменить мир [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://zn.ua/TECHNOLOGIES/interfeysy-vzaimodeystviya-chelovecheskogo-mozga-i-kompyutera-mogut-izmenit-mir-the-economist-271459_.html.

Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception. M. [in Russian].

Bila, A. (2010). Surrealism. K. [in Ukrainian].

Hyrz, K. (2004). Interpretation of Cultures. M. [in Russian].

Didi-Yuberman, J. (2001). What we see is what looks at us. St. Petersburg [in Russian].

Kaiku, M. (2017). The future of reason. Scientific attempts to comprehend, refine and strengthen intellect. Lviv [in Ukrainian].

Kiyanovskaya, L. (2017). What is the style of the outside today? Scientific dialogues with N.O.Gerasimova-Persidska. Naukovyi visnyk NMAU im. P.Chaikovskoho, 19, 65-91 [in Ukrainian].

Kutsenkov, P. (2007). Psychology of primitive and traditional art. Moscwa: Progress-Traditsia [in Russian].

Laroshfuko, F. (1974). Memoirs. Maxima. M. [in Russian].

Levi-Strauss, J.-C. (1999). Primitive thinking. M. [in Russian].

Levi-Strauss, J.-C. (2008). Structural Anthropology. M. [in Russian].

Lychkovakh, V. (2006 Transgression and artistic creativity. V. Lichkovakh. Divasad cultury: Selected articles on aesthetics, culturology, philosophy of art), pp. 27-38. Chernigiv [in Ukrainian].

Lotman, Yu. (2002). Culture and Information. – Articles on the semiotics of culture and art St. Petersburg

[in Russian].

Ramachandran, V. (2015). Brain tells: What makes us human. M. [in Russian].

Soroka. I. (2017). Subtext as a category of stage broadcasting. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. K.: NAKKKiM [in Ukrainian].

Stepuroko, B. (2017). The manifestations of artistic introversion in the works of composers of Ukraine in the second half of the XX – beginning of the XXI century. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. K.: NAKKKiM [in Ukrainian].

Ortega-I-Gasset, H. (1991 The Uprising of the Masses. H. Ortega-I-Gasset. Aesthetics. Philosophy of Culture ), pp. 309-349. M. [in Russian].

Usmanova, A. (2000). Umberto Eco: Paradoxes of Interpretation. Minsk [in Russian].

Hebb, D. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. New York [in English].

Herskovits, M. (1955). Cultural Anthropology. Knopf [in English].

Kluckhohn, C. (1962).Culture and Behavior. New-York [in English].

Neuronet learned to recognize aesthetically attractive photos. Retrieved from https://bykvu.com/bukvy/ 81954-nejroset-nauchili-raspoznavat-esteticheski-privlekatelnye-foto [in Russian].

Interfaces between the interaction of the human brain and the computer can change the world. Retrieved from https://zn.ua/TECHNOLOGIES/interfeysy-vzaimodeystviya-chelovecheskogo-mozga-i-kompyutera-mogut-izmenit-mir-the-economist-271459_.html [in Russian].