The role of Epstein-Barr virus and human endogenous retroviruses in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis

Authors

  • A Zelenska IMINAMN,
  • O Tupotilov IMINAMN,
  • T Kolyada IMINAMN,

Keywords:

multiple sclerosis, Epstein-Barr virus, human endogenous retroviruses, immunopathogenesis.

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), the development of which is associated with the action of a large number of pathogenetic factors which role can vary significantly at different stages of the disease. Although the etiology of MS still remains unclear, in recent years the hypothesis of the pathogenetic role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and human endogenous retroviruses, such as MSRV / HERV-W, is actively considered. EBV has a unique ability to infect, activate, and latently persist within B lymphocytes during human life. Immune control of EBV infection in healthy organisms is realized through humoral and cellular mechanisms – EBV virions are destroyed by neutralizing antibodies, and proliferating and lytically active EBV-infected B cells are the targets of specific CD8+ T cells. At the same time, EBV remains latent for most of the life of the infected individual, expressing a single gene (EBNA1) within memory B cells. EBNA1 protein is not well recognized by CD8+ T cells, allowing infected memory B cells to avoid detection. In addition to epidemiological data, association of EBV with MS is indicated by a significant increase in IgG titres to EBV antigens, mainly to EBNA1, in serum of patients a few years before the onset of clinical manifestations of the disease. Although the data on the presence of EBV in the CNS remain controversial due to a number of methodological difficulties, a number of studies have shown the presence of EBV-infected B cells in the CNS, as well as effector CD8+ T cells specific for them in meningeal inflammatory infiltrates and white matter lesions in brain samples of MS patients. At the same time, the EBV bystander damage hypothesis which considers CNS damage in multiple sclerosis as a result of EBV-targeted cytotoxic reactions of CD8+ T cells, does not explain the autoimmune nature of MS, although secondary autoimmune responses could develop as a result of sensitization to CNS antigens released after a cytotoxic response directed to EBV elimination causing bystander neuronal damage. It also does not explain why the EBV-targeted T cell immune response sufficient to cause bystander CNS damage does not eliminate EBV-infected B cells from the CNS. It was found that subpopulations of EBV-specific CD8+ T cells in MS patients show signs of depletion, increasing with the duration of the disease, which apparently allows EBV-infected B cells to accumulate in the CNS and leads to the formation of a vicious circle, in which the initially defective T cell response is aggravated by depletion of T cells as a result of a constant high viral load in CNS. M. Pender has proposed a hypothesis of the pathogenesis of MS according to which MS is caused by the accumulation in the CNS of autoreactive EBV-infected B cells that are capable of self-sustaining proliferation, production of pathogenic antibodies in the CNS, and providing costimulatory and survival-promoting signals to autoreactive CD4+ T cells. But it remains unclear what type of CD8+ T cells is dominant in CNS lesions in patients with MS - specific to EBV, specific to myelin proteins, or both types of cells.

However, the delay between seroconversion in the EBV-positive status in late EBV infection and the development of MS may indicate the presence of additional factors in the development of the disease. In recent years, a number of studies indicate a possible pathogenetic role of endogenous human retroviruses (HERV) in MS. In infectious mononucleosis, the increased expression of MSRV/HERV-W in peripheral blood mononuclear cells has been observed, moreover, a direct correlation has been found between levels of IgG to EBNA-1 and levels of MSRV-specific mRNA expression. Binding of the EBV caused activation of MSRV / HERV-W in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in astrocytes. Activation of MSRV/HERV-W was also revealed in inflammatory context and in neuropathogenic processes in MS. In the peripheral blood mononuclear cells culture of MSRV-positive individuals, expression of MSRV was activated by the action of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ, and significantly decreased by IFN-β. At the brain level, HERV-Wenv activates Toll-like receptors (TLR4) of oligodendroglial precursor cells, which results in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and a decrease in myelin protein expression. Within chronic brain lesions in MS, HERV-Wenv was detected in microglia / macrophages near TLR4-positive oligodendroglial precursor cells. Immunohistochemical detection of HERV-Wenv protein in postmortem brain samples of MS patients showed its elevated levels only in active lesions in astrocytes and microglia, and the intensity of staining correlated with the degree of active demyelination and inflammation. Thus, EBV infection and activation of retroviruses are considered as important elements in the pathogenesis of MS. Within the framework of the "viral hypothesis", the most important tasks are the verification of data indicating the possible etiological role of EBV, the study of the pathogenetic mechanisms associated with MSRV/HERV-W at different stages of MS development, as well as the identification of immunological and genetic factors associated with the defective control of EBV-infected B cells and, as a result, their migration and accumulation in the CNS. Thus, EBV infection and activation of retroviruses are considered as important factors in the pathogenesis of MS. Late EBV infection may be the initiating trigger of the pathological process leading to the development of MS years later, and HERV-W / MSRV affect as active cofactors of the neuropathogenesis of the MS accompanying the course of the disease. The aimof the review was to consider the latest evidence of possible mechanisms of the involvement of EBV and human endogenous retroviruses in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.

References

Ascherio A. Epstein–Barr virus infection and multiple sclerosis: A review / A. Ascherio, K. L. Munger // Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology. – 2010. – Vol. 5. – P. 271-277.

Pender M.P. The essential role of Epstein–Barr virus in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis / M. P. Pender // Neuroscientist. – 2011. – Vol. 17. – P. 351-367.

Morandi E. The association between human endogenous retroviruses and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis / E. Morandi, R. Tanasescu, R/ E. Tarlinton [et al.] // PLOS ONE. – 2017. – Vol. 12 (2). Avalible at: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/ article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172415 (request date 2.02.2018).

Dolei A. The aliens inside us: HERV-W endogenous retroviruses and multiple sclerosis / A. Dolei // Multiple Sclerosis Journal. – 2018. – Vol. 24 (1). – P. 42-47.

Sundström P. An altered immune response to Epstein-Barr virus in multiple sclerosis / P. Sundström, P. Juto, G. Wadell [et al.] // Neurology. – 2004. – Vol. 62 (12). – P. 2277-2282.

Levin L. I. Temporal relationship between elevation of Epstein-Barr virus antibody titers and initial onset of neurological symptoms in multiple sclerosis / L. I. Levin, K. L. Munger, M.V. Rubertone [et al.] // JAMA. – 2005. – Vol. 293. – P. 2496-2500.

DeLorenze G. N. Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis: evidence of association from a prospective study with long-term follow-up / G. N. DeLorenze, K. L. Munger, E.T. Lennette [et al.] // Archives of Neurology. – 2006. – Vol. 63. – P. 839-844.

Serafini B. Dysregulated Epstein-Barr virus infection in the multiple sclerosis brain / B. Serafini, B. Rosicarelli, D. Franciotta [et al.] // The Journal of Experimental Medicine. – 2007. – Vol. 204. – № 12. – P. 2899-2912.

Lünemann J. D. Elevated Epstein–Barr virus-encoded nuclear antigen-1 immune responses predict conversion to multiple sclerosis. / J. D. Lünemann, M. Tintoré, B. Messmer [et al.] // Annals of Neurology. – 2010. – Vol. 67. – P. 159-169.

Kvistad S. Antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus and MRI disease activity in multiple sclerosis / S. Kvistad, K. M. Myhr, T. Holmøy [et al.] // Multiple Sclerosis Journal. – 2014. – Vol 20, Issue 14. – P. 1833-1840.

Farrell R.A. Humoral immune response to EBV in multiple sclerosis is associated with disease activity on MRI / R. A. Farrell, D. Antony, G. R. Wall [et al.] // Neurology. – 2009. – Vol. 73. – P. 32-38.

De Jager P. L. Integrating risk factors / P. L. De Jager, K. C. Simon, K. L. Munger [et al.] // Neurology. – 2008. – Vol. 70 (13 Part 2). – P. 1113-1118.

Peferoen L. A. Epstein Barr virus is not a characteristic feature in the central nervous system in established multiple sclerosis / L. A. Peferoen, F. Lamers, L. N. Lodder [et al.] // Brain. – 2010. –Vol. 133, Issue 5, e137. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/brain /article/133/5/e137/540012 (request date 10.02.2018)

Sargsyan S. A. Absence of Epstein-Barr virus in the brain and CSF of patients with multiple sclerosis / S. A. Sargsyan, A. J. Shearer, A. M. Ritchie [et al.] // Neurology. – 2010. – Vol. 74. – P. 1127-1135.

Willis S. N. Epstein-Barr virus infection is not a characteristic feature of multiple sclerosis brain / S. N. Willis, C. Stadelmann, S. J. Rodig [et al.] // Brain. – 2009. – Vol. 132. – P. 3318-3328.

Lassmann H. Epstein–Barr virus in the multiple sclerosis brain: a controversial issue—report on a focused workshop held in the Centre for Brain Research of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria / H. Lassmann, G. Niedobitek, F. Aloisi, J. M. Middeldorp // Brain. – 2011. – Vol. 134. – P. 2772-2786.

Pender M. P. Does Epstein–Barr virus infection in the brain drive the development of multiple sclerosis? / M. P. Pender // Brain. – 2009. – Vol. 132, Issue 12. – P. 3196-3198.

Serafini B. Radioactive in situ hybridization for Epstein–Barr virus-encoded small RNA supports presence of Epstein–Barr virus in the multiple sclerosis brain / B. Serafini, L. Muzio, B. Rosicarelli, F. Aloisi // Brain. – 2013. – Vol. 136(7), e233-e233. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/136/7/e233/274914 (request date 10.02.2018).

Magliozzi R.. B-cell enrichment and Epstein-Barr virus infection in inflammatory cortical lesions in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis / R. Magliozzi, B. Serafini, B. Rosicarelli [et al.] // Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. – 2013. – Vol. 72(1). – P. 29-41.

Tzartos J.S. Association of innate immune activation with latent Epstein-Barr virus in active MS lesions / J.S. Tzartos, G. Khan, A. Vossenkamper, M. Cruz-Sadaba [et al.] // Neurology. – 2012. – Vol. 78(1). – P. 15-23.

Hassani A. Epstein-Barr virus is present in the brain of most cases of multiple sclerosis and may engage more than just B cells / A. Hassani, J. R. Corboy, S. Al-Salam, G. Khan // PLoS ONE. – 2018. – Vol. 13(2): e0192109. Available at: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/ article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192109 (request date 20.02.2018).

Cencioni M. T. Programmed death 1 is highly expressed on CD8+CD57+ T cells in patients with stable multiple sclerosis and inhibits their cytotoxic response to Epstein-Barr virus / M. T. Cencioni, R. Magliozzi, R. Nicholas [et al.] // Immunology. – 2017. – Vol. 152(4). – P. 660-676.

Van Nierop G. P. Phenotypic and functional characterization of T cells in white matter lesions of multiple sclerosis patients / G. P. Van Nierop, M. M. van Luijn, S. S. Michels [et al.] // Acta Neuropathologica. – 2017. – Vol. 134(3). – P. 383-401.

Lovato L. Related B cell clones populate the meninges and parenchyma of patients with multiple sclerosis / L. Lovato, S. N. Willis, S. J. Rodig [et al.] // Brain. – 2011. – Vol. 134 (2). – P. 534-541.

Barnett M. H. Immunoglobulins and complement in postmortem multiple sclerosis tissue / M. H. Barnett, J.D. Parratt, E.S. Cho, J.W. Prineas // Annals of Neurology. – 2009. – Vol. 65(1). – P. 32-46.

Henderson A. P. Multiple sclerosis: distribution of inflammatory cells in newly forming lesions / A.P. Henderson, M. H. Barnett, J. D. Parratt, J. W. Prineas // Annals of Neurology. – 2009. – Vol. 66(6). – P. 739-753.

Magliozzi R. Meningeal B-cell follicles in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis associate with early onset of disease and severe cortical pathology / R. Magliozzi, O. Howell, A. Vora [et al.] // Brain. – 2007. – Vol. 130. – P. 1089-1104.

Magliozzi R. A gradient of neuronal loss and meningeal inflammation in multiple sclerosis / R. Magliozzi, O. W. Howell, С. Reeves et al. // Annals of Neurology. – 2010. – Vol. 68. – P. 477-493.

Aloisi F. Lymphoid neogenesis in chronic inflammatory disease. / F. Aloisi, R. Pujol-Borrell // Nature Reviews. Immunology. – 2006. – Vol. 6. – P. 205-217.

Lossius A. High throughput sequencing of TCR repertoires in multiple sclerosis reveals intrathecal enrichment of EBV-reactive CD8+ T cells / A. Lossius, J. N. Johansen, F. Vartdal [et al.] // European Journal of Immunology. – 2014. – Vol. 44(11). – P. 3439-3452.

Michel L. B Cells in the Multiple Sclerosis Central Nervous System: Trafficking and Contribution to CNS-Compartmentalized Inflammation / L. Michel, H. Touil, N. B. Pikor, J. L. Gommerman, Prat A, Bar-Or A. // Frontiers in Immunology. 2015. – Vol. 6:636. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4689808/pdf/fimmu-06-00636.pdf (request date 28.02.2018).

Altmann M. Epstein-Barr Virus Provides a New Paradigm: A Requirement for the Immediate Inhibition of Apoptosis / M. Altmann, W.Hammerschmidt // PLoS Biol. – 2005. – Vol. 3(12): e404. – Available at: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030404 (request date 10.01.2018).

Pender M. P. Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis: potential opportunities for immunotherapy / M. P. Pender, S. R. Burrows // Clinical & Translational Immunology. – 2014. – Vol. 3 (10). – Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4237030/ (request date 1.12.2017)

Khanna R. Role of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases / R. Khanna, S. R. Burrows // Annual Review of Microbiology. – 2000. – Vol. 54. – P. 19-48.

Hislop A. D. Cellular responses to viral infection in humans: lessons from Epstein-Barr virus / A. D. Hislop, G. S. Taylor, D. Sauce, A. B. Rickinson // Annual Review of Immunology. – 2007. –Vol. 25. – P. 587-617.

Thorley-Lawson D. A. EBV Persistence – Introducing the Virus / D. A. Thorley-Lawson // Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. – 2015. – Vol. 390 (1). – P. 151-209.

Craig J. C. T-cell-mediated suppression of Epstein-Barr virus-induced B lymphocyte activation in multiple sclerosis / J. C. Craig, M. Haire, J. D. Merrett // Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology. – 1988. – Vol. 48. – P. 253-260.

Pender M. P. Decreased T cell reactivity to Epstein–Barr virus infected lymphoblastoid cell lines in multiple sclerosis / M. P. Pender, P. A. Csurhes, A. Lenarczyk [et al.] // Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. – 2009. – Vol. 80. – P. 498-505.

Lindsey J. W. Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis: Cellular immune response and cross-reactivity / J. W. Lindsey, L. M. Hatfield // Journal of Neuroimmunology. – 2010. – Vol. 229. – P. 238-242.

Pender M. P. Defective T-cell control of Epstein–Barr virus infection in multiple sclerosis / M. P. Pender, P. A. Csurhes, J. M. Burrows, S. R. Burrows // Clinical & Translational Immunology. – 2017. – Vol. 6 (1). – Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5292561/pdf/cti201687a.pdf (request date 1.12.2017).

Mameli G. Expression and activation by Epstein Barr virus of human endogenous retroviruses-W in blood cells and astrocytes: inference for multiple sclerosis / G. Mameli, L. Poddighe, A. Mei [et al.] // PLoS One. – 2012. – Vol. 7: e44991. – Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459916/pdf/pone.0044991.pdf (request date 1.02.2018).

Mameli G. Activation of MSRV-type endogenous retroviruses during infectious mononucleosis and Epstein-Barr virus latency: The missing link with multiple sclerosis? / G. Mameli, G. Madeddu, A. Mei [et al.] // PLoS ONE. – 2013. – Vol. 8: e78474. – Available at: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078474 (request date 1.02.2018).

Morandi E. Human endogenous retroviruses and multiple sclerosis: Causation, association, or after-effect? / E. Morandi, R. E. Tarlinton, R. Tanasescu, B. Gran // Multiple Sclerosis Journal. – 2017. – Vol. 23 (8). – P. 1050-1055.

Kremer D. Human endogenous retrovirus type W envelope protein inhibits oligodendroglial precursor cell differentiation / D. Kremer, T. Schichel, M. Forster [et al.] // Annals of Neurology. –2013. – Vol.74. – P. 721-732.

Mameli G. Brains and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients hyperexpress MS-associated retrovirus/HERV-W endogenous retrovirus, but not Human herpesvirus-6 / G. Mameli, V. Astone, G. Arru [et al.] // Journal of General Virology. – 2007. – Vol. 88. – P. 264-274.

Antony J. M. Human endogenous retrovirus glycoprotein-mediated induction of redox reactants causes oligodendrocyte death and demyelination / J. M. Antony, G. Van Marle, W. Opii [et al.] // Nature Neuroscience. – 2004. – Vol. 7. – P. 1088-1095.

Perron H. Human endogenous retrovirus (HERV)-W ENV and GAG proteins: physiological expression in human brain and pathophysiological modulation in multiple sclerosis lesions / H. Perron, F. Lazarini, K. Ruprecht [et al.] // Journal of Neurovirology. – 2005. – Vol. 11. – P. 23-33.

Sotgiu S. Multiple sclerosis- associated retrovirus and progressive disability of multiple sclerosis / S. Sotgiu, G. Mameli, C. Serra [et al.] // Multiple Sclerosis Journal. – 2010. – Vol. 16. – P. 1248-1251.

Levin L. I. Primary infection with the Epstein-Barr virus and risk of multiple sclerosis / L. I. Levin, K. L. Munger, E. J. O’Reilly [et al.] // Annals of Neurology. – 2010. – Vol. 67. – P. 824-830.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-20

How to Cite

Zelenska, A., Tupotilov, O., & Kolyada, T. (2018). The role of Epstein-Barr virus and human endogenous retroviruses in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Annals of Mechnikov’s Institute, (1), 32–37. Retrieved from https://journals.uran.ua/ami/article/view/188366

Issue

Section

Research Articles