Revealing the effect of rounded noise protection screens with finite sound insulation on an acoustic field around linear sound sources

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.224327

Keywords:

rounded noise protection screen, partial domain method, finite sound insulation, noise reduction

Abstract

This paper reports studying the reduction of traffic noise by rounded noise protection screens with finite sound insulation, that is, those that can pass sound.

Almost all models of acoustic screens, which are examined by analytical methods, are either direct or such that disregard the passage of sound through the screen, that is, it is assumed that the screen sound insulation is non-finite. This approach made it possible to solve the problem for a simplified model analytically but made it impossible to analyze the required sound insulation of noise protection screens.

In the current paper, the problem of investigating an acoustic field around the screen whose sound insulation is finite has been stated, that is, it was taken into consideration that a sound wave propagates through the body of the screen. In addition, a given problem considers a rounded screen, rather than vertical, which is also used in different countries.

Such a problem was solved by the method of partial domains. This method has made it possible to strictly analytically build a solution to the problem by simplifying it to solving an infinite system of algebraic equations, which was solved by the method of reduction.

The screen model was set by the values of the density and speed of sound in the screen material. This approach has made it possible to change the acoustic impedance of the screen material and thereby change the sound insulation of the screen. That has made it possible to quantify the effect of screen sound insulation on its effectiveness. It has been shown that the efficiency of noise protection screens with finite sound insulation is approaching the efficiency of acoustically rigid screens, provided that the screen's natural sound insulation is 13–15 dB greater than the estimated efficiency of the rigid screen.

The study results could make it possible to more accurately assess the effectiveness of noise protection screens. Determining the screen acoustic efficiency would make it possible to set requirements for its sound insulation characteristics. That could make it possible to select the designs of noise protection screens with minimal physical parameters, such as thickness, weight, etc.

Author Biographies

Vitalii Didkovskyi, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Acoustic and Multimedia Electronic Systems

Vitaly Zaets, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»

PhD, Аssociate Professor

Department of Acoustic and Multimedia Electronic Systems

Svetlana Kotenko, State Enterprise «State Research Institute of Building Constructions»

PhD, Junior Researcher

Department of Building Physics and Energy Efficiency

References

  1. Jacyna, M., Wasiak, M., Lewczuk, K., Karoń, G. (2017). Noise and environmental pollution from transport: decisive problems in developing ecologically efficient transport systems. Journal of Vibroengineering, 19 (7), 5639–5655. doi: http://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2017.19371
  2. Mozhaiv, O., Kuchuk, H., Shvets, D., Tretiak, V., Tretiak, M., Ostropilets, V. et. al. (2019). Minimization of power losses by traction-transportation vehicles at motion over a bearing surface that undergoes deformation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (1 (97)), 69–74. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.156721
  3. Macdonald, H. M. (1915). A Class of Diffraction Problems. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2 (1), 410–427. doi: http://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2_14.1.410
  4. Maekawa, Z. (1968). Noise reduction by screens. Applied Acoustics, 1 (3), 157–173. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/0003-682x(68)90020-0
  5. Kurze, U. J., Anderson, G. S. (1971). Sound attenuation by barriers. Applied Acoustics, 4 (1), 35–53. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/0003-682x(71)90024-7
  6. Isei, T., Embleton, T. F. W., Piercy, J. E. (1980). Noise reduction by barriers on finite impedance ground. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67 (1), 46–58. doi: http://doi.org/10.1121/1.383788
  7. Hewett, D. P., Langdon, S., Chandler-Wilde, S. N. (2014). A frequency-independent boundary element method for scattering by two-dimensional screens and apertures. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 35 (4), 1698–1728. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/dru043
  8. François, S., Schevenels, M., Degrande, G., Borgions, J., Thyssen, B. (2008). A 2.5 D finite element-boundary element model for vibration isolating screens. Proceedings of ISMA2008 International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, 5, 2765–2776. Available at: https://limo.libis.be/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=LIRIAS253122&context=L&vid=Lirias&search_scope=Lirias&tab=default_tab&lang=en_US&fromSitemap=1
  9. Didkovskyi, V., Zaets, V., Kotenko, S. (2020). Improvement of the efficiency of noise protective screens due to sound absorption. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3 (1 (53)), 11–15. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.206018
  10. Trochymenko, M. P., Zaets, V. P., Osipchuk, L. N., Kotenko, S. G. (2019). The efficiency calculation method for noise barriers located on bridge structures. Science and Construction, 22 (4), 45–51. doi: http://doi.org/10.33644/scienceandconstruction.v22i4.119
  11. Vovk, I. V., Matsypura, V. T. (2010). Vliianie svoistv poverkhnostei shumozaschitnogo barera na ego effektivnost. Akustichnii vіsnik, 13 (1), 3–10. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/115418
  12. Zaets, V., Kotenko, S. (2017). Investigation of the efficiency of a noise protection screen with an opening at its base. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (5 (89)), 4–11. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.112350
  13. El-Rayes, K., Liu, L., Ignacio, E. J. (2018). Alternative Noise Barrier Approvals. Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois Department of Transportation. doi: http://doi.org/10.36501/0197-9191/18-021
  14. Li, X., Hu, X., Zheng, J. (2020). Statistical energy method for noise reduction performance of the vertical noise barrier alongside railway bridges. Applied Acoustics, 170, 107503. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107503
  15. Abramovits, M., Stigan, I. (Eds.) (1979). Spravochnik po spetsialnym funktsiiam. Moscow: Nauka, 832.
  16. Shenderov, E. L. (1972). Volnovye zadachi gidroakustiki. Leningrad: Sudostroenie, 352.
  17. Hrinchenko, V. T., Vovk, I. V., Matsypura, V. T. (2007). Osnovy akustyky. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 640.
  18. Vovk, I. V., Grinchenko, V. T., Matsypura, V. T. (2012). Shumozaschitnye svoistva barerov, razmeschennykh vdol gorodskoi ulitsy. Akustichnii vіsnik, 15 (2), 3–16. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/87399159.pdf
  19. Zhang, X., Liu, R., Cao, Z., Wang, X., Li, X. (2019). Acoustic performance of a semi-closed noise barrier installed on a high-speed railway bridge: Measurement and analysis considering actual service conditions. Measurement, 138, 386–399. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.030

Downloads

Published

2021-02-26

How to Cite

Didkovskyi, V., Zaets, V., & Kotenko, S. (2021). Revealing the effect of rounded noise protection screens with finite sound insulation on an acoustic field around linear sound sources . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(5 (109), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.224327

Issue

Section

Applied physics