Peer Review Process

The editorial board practices double-blind peer review. This process involves the following:

1. First, the editors consider all manuscripts to assess their compliance with the journal subject matter and requirements.

2. After the decision of the editors, submitted manuscripts are sent to at least two external experts working in the relevant field. The manuscript undergoes a double-blind review: neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other.

3. Reviewers' comments are transmitted to the authors, together with possible recommendations for the manuscript revision. The editor informs the authors, whether the manuscript is adopted without revision or authors are given the opportunity to review the manuscript and submit it again, or the manuscript is rejected.

Deadline 1-6 months

Reviewers should refrain from uploading manuscripts to the LLM software or using other LLM technologies that could lead to a breach of confidentiality.

With regard to reviewers, the editorial board asks to confirm the absence of a conflict of interest at the stage of selection of manuscripts for review or at the time of receipt of the manuscript by the reviewer. If such a conflict is detected at the stage of reviewing, the reviewer is obliged to inform the editorial office of this and refuse to review this manuscript. The editorial in such a situation are guided by the recommendations These recommendations are based on the COPE schemes, of which the publishing house TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC is a member, "Undisclosed conflict of interest in a submitted manuscript" and "Undisclosed conflict of interest in a published article".