Revealing the influence of age and fractional composition of woody biomass on the kinetic characteristics of thermal decomposition

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.352509

Keywords:

energy willow (Salix fragilis), thermal analysis, thermal decomposition, thermogram, derivatograph

Abstract

This study investigates processes related to thermal decomposition and direct combustion of woody biomass derived from the fast-growing energy willow Salix fragilis. The task addressed is predetermined by the lack of a sufficient database on kinetic parameters required for the efficient utilization of woody biofuel in modern boiler systems, particularly under conditions of transitioning from fossil to renewable energy sources.

The thermal degradation pattern of woody biomass of different ages and particle-size distributions was explored in detail using differential thermogravimetry (DTG) and differential thermal analysis (DTA). The results demonstrate empirical dependences of relative mass loss of samples at heating, which made it possible to identify the characteristic stages of thermal decomposition and the intensity of mass transfer.

The clearly observed influence of biomass age and particle-size distribution enabled identification of the key kinetic features that directly affect the combustion rate and completeness of fuel conversion. These differences provide a more accurate prediction of fuel behavior in actual power units and lay the basis for forming the primary database of combustion kinetic constants. The results are attributed to differences in the structural organization of the wood, the biomass age, as well as the content of volatile components in samples of different age groups.

The practical application of the established dependences is relevant for the design and optimization of boilers operating on comminuted woody biomass. The defined parameters make it possible to optimize fuel particle-size composition, ensure a rational residence time of biomass particles in the combustion zone, and improve the energy efficiency of boiler units when replacing traditional fuels with renewable raw materials.

Author Biographies

Andrii Kapustianskyi, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD

Department of Heat Engineering and Thermal and Nuclear Power Plants

Kateryna Romanova, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

PhD

Department of Heat and Alternative Power Engineering

Igor Galyanchuk, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD

Department of Heat Engineering and Thermal and Nuclear Power Plants

Oksana Yurasova, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD

Department of Heat Engineering and Thermal and Nuclear Power Plants

References

  1. DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/2001 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast) (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018L2001&from=EN
  2. Varchenko, O. M., Oleksandrivna, D. O., Halchynska, Y. M., Tkachenko, K. V., Byba, V. A., Svynous, N. I. (2020). Strategic Priorities for the Use of Biomass in the Energy Supply System of Ukraine. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 9 (1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/vjbsd-2020-0005
  3. Geletukha, G. G., Zheliezna, T. A., Drahniev, S. V. (2023). Analysis of prospects and sustainability issues of liquid motor biofuels production in the eu and in Ukraine. Thermophysics and Thermal Power Engineering, 45 (1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.1.2023.6
  4. Klymchuk, O., Korniychuk, O., Yaremenko, O., Lapshin, S., Samborska, O., Kovalov, B. (2024). Global processes of solid biofuel production: Trends and prospects of its development in Ukraine. Energy Reports, 12, 5346–5355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.11.007
  5. Kravets, T., Galyanchuk, I., Yurasova, O., Kapustianskyi, A., Romanova, K. (2025). Technological and Engineering Aspects of the Development of Biogas and Biomethane Plants in Ukraine: Prospects for Integration into the Country’s Energy System. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 8 (1), 801–827. https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.080134
  6. Clean Energy for All Europeans Package. European Commission. Available at: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-strategy/clean-energy-all-europeans_en
  7. Wieruszewski, M., Mydlarz, K. (2022). The Potential of the Bioenergy Market in the European Union – An Overview of Energy Biomass Resources. Energies, 15 (24), 9601. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249601
  8. Alcocer-García, H., Sánchez-Ramírez, E., García-García, E., Ramírez-Márquez, C., Ponce-Ortega, J. M. (2025). Unlocking the Potential of Biomass Resources: A Review on Sustainable Process Design and Intensification. Resources, 14 (9), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources14090143
  9. Ali, F., Dawood, A., Hussain, A., Alnasir, M. H., Khan, M. A., Butt, T. M. et al. (2024). Fueling the future: biomass applications for green and sustainable energy. Discover Sustainability, 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00309-z
  10. Matusiak, M., Ślęzak, R., Ledakowicz, S. (2020). Thermogravimetric Kinetics of Selected Energy Crops Pyrolysis. Energies, 13 (15), 3977. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153977
  11. Wang, L., Lei, H., Liu, J., Bu, Q. (2018). Thermal decomposition behavior and kinetics for pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis of Douglas fir. RSC Advances, 8 (4), 2196–2202. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra12187c
  12. Salleh, S. F., Mohd Roslan, M. E., Abd Rahman, A., Shamsuddin, A. H., Tuan Abdullah, T. A. R., Sovacool, B. K. (2020). Transitioning to a sustainable development framework for bioenergy in Malaysia: policy suggestions to catalyse the utilisation of palm oil mill residues. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00269-y
  13. Zsinka, V., Tarcsay, B. L., Miskolczi, N. (2024). Determination of Kinetic and Thermodynamic Parameters of Biomass Gasification with TG-FTIR and Regression Model Fitting. Energies, 17 (8), 1875. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081875
  14. Toklu, E. (2017). Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 107, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.008
  15. Yusuf, N., Almomani, F. (2023). Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies: Process design and economic considerations. Energy, 265, 126163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126163
  16. Lysenko, A. A., Vorobiov, M. V. (2021). Analysis of direct biomass combustion process in industrial rotary furnaces. Collection of Scientific Publications NUS, 1, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.15589/znp2021.1(484).6
  17. Fischer, O., Lemaire, R., Bensakhria, A. (2024). Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic modeling of the pyrolysis of different biomass types by means of model-fitting, model-free and network modeling approaches. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 149 (19), 10941–10963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12868-w
  18. Melikoglu, M., Ozdemir, M., Ates, M. (2023). Pyrolysis kinetics, physicochemical characteristics and thermal decomposition behavior of agricultural wastes using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy Nexus, 11, 100231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100231
  19. Porotnikova, N., Zakharov, D., Khodimchuk, A., Kurumchin, E., Osinkin, D. (2023). Determination of Kinetic Parameters and Identification of the Rate-Determining Steps in the Oxygen Exchange Process for LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3−δ. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24 (16), 13013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241613013
  20. BS ISO 334:2020. Coal and coke. Determination of total sulfur. Eschka method. https://doi.org/10.3403/30404810
  21. ISO 17247:2020. Coal and coke – Ultimate analysis. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/79740.html
  22. ISO 625:2002. Solid mineral fuels – Determination of carbon and hydrogen – Liebig method. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
  23. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., Zheng, C. (2007). Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 86 (12-13), 1781–1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013
  24. Diblasi, C. (2008). Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34 (1), 47–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.001
  25. Grønli, M. G., Várhegyi, G., Di Blasi, C. (2002). Thermogravimetric Analysis and Devolatilization Kinetics of Wood. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 41 (17), 4201–4208. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0201157
  26. Vamvuka, D., Sfakiotakis, S. (2011). Effects of heating rate and water leaching of perennial energy crops on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics. Renewable Energy, 36 (9), 2433–2439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.02.013
  27. Bridgwater, A. V. (2012). Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass and Bioenergy, 38, 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048
Revealing the influence of age and fractional composition of woody biomass on the kinetic characteristics of thermal decomposition

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Kapustianskyi, A., Romanova, K., Galyanchuk, I., & Yurasova, O. (2026). Revealing the influence of age and fractional composition of woody biomass on the kinetic characteristics of thermal decomposition. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(8 (139), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.352509

Issue

Section

Energy-saving technologies and equipment