Inheritance of grain hardness by F1 and F2 bread winterwheat

Authors

  • А. В. Ярош Plant Production Institute nd. a VYa Yuriev NAAS, NCPGRU, Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3178-0009
  • В. К. Рябчун Plant Production Institute nd. a VYa Yuriev NAAS, NCPGRU, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • І. А. Петухова Plant Production Institute nd. a VYa Yuriev NAAS, NCPGRU, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • О. І. Падалка Plant Production Institute nd. a VYa Yuriev NAAS, NCPGRU, Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2017.104916

Keywords:

bread winter wheat, variety, grain softness, grain hardness, hybridization, inheritance, segregation

Abstract

The aim and tasks of the study. To establish patterns in the inheritance of grain hardness in collection bread winter wheat accessions.

Results and discussion. The data demonstrate different nature of the grain hardness inheritance in F1, namely: intermediate inheritance, positive dominance and negative dominance (hp = from 1 to - 1). Of 24 F1 hybrids, 13 had intermediate inheritance, 7 hybrid combinations had negative dominance, and positive dominance was observed in 4 combinations. Depending on the parent genotypes, the grain hardness segregation in F2 was in accordance with the mono-, di- or three-hybrid scheme. Endosperm texture was mainly formed by additive polymeria. The grain hardness segregation in F2 and the phenotype distribution occurred depending on the genotypic composition of parents.

Conclusions. The nature of the grain hardness inheritance in F1 hybrids was established; it occurred according to the following types: intermediate inheritance (54.2%), negative dominance (29.2%) and positive dominance (16.7): hp = 1 − -1. The female effect was also established for the endosperm texture formation in F1 hybrid grain. Analyzing F2 hybrid grain, we noticed the greatest number of combinations segregated by dihybrid scheme: 15: 1, 9: 7, 7: 9 (66.7%). Three-hybrid type of segregation was observed in 6 combinations (25%); monogenic - in 2 (8.3%)

References

Rybalka ОІ. There is no better flour for pastry, than sperm alterna wheat. Zerno I khlib. 2008; 4: 47.

Rybalka ОІ, Axelrud DV. What characteristics should have flour for biscuits? Influence tensinet and biochemical composition of flour on the quality of biscuits. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Selektsiyno-genetychnogo instytutu. 2004; 46: 247–253.

Greenwell P, Schofield JD. A starch granule protein associated with endosperm softnessin wheat. CerealChem. 1985; 63: 379–380.

Symes KJ. The inheritance of grain hardness in wheat as measured by particle-size index. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1965; 16: 113–123.

Mattern PJ, Morris R, Schmidt JW et al. Location of genes for kernel properties in the wheat cultivar «Cheyenne» using chromosome substitution lines. In: ER Sears, LMS Sears, editors. Proc. 4th Intl. Wheat Genet. Symp., University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 1973: 703–707.

Simonov АV. A genetic study of the characteristics of the morphology of the ear and the structure of the endosperm of grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), introgression from Aegilops speltoides tausсh. [dissertation]. 2010. 17 p.

Giroux J, Morris CF. A glycine to serine change in puroindoline b is associated with wheat grain hardness and low levels of starch-surface friabilin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1997; 95: 857-864.

Chebotar SV, Кurakina КО, Khokhlov ОМ, Chebotar GО, Syvolap YuМ. Phenotypic expression of alleles of puroindolin genes of soft wheat. Cytol. Genet. 2012; 46(4): 9–18.

Dospekhov B. A. Methodology field experience (the basics of statistical processing of the results of research). Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985. 351 p.

Yarosh AV, Ryаbchun VK, Leonov OYu, Didenko SYu, Kopytina LP, Shelyakina TA. The methodology of evaluation of grain hardness in wheat soft winter. Plant genetic resources. 2014; 15: 120–131.

Griffing B. Analyssis of quantitative gene-action by constant parent regression and related technigues. Genetics. 1950; 35: 303–321.

Published

2017-06-22

Issue

Section

METHODS AND RESULTS SELECTION