Antioxidant properties of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds

Authors

  • А. О. Василенко Plant Production Institute nd.a.V.Ya.Yuryev NAAS, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • В. В. Поздняков Plant Production Institute nd.a.V.Ya.Yuryev NAAS, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • О. B. Анциферова Plant Production Institute nd.a.V.Ya.Yuryev NAAS, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • И. Н. Безуглый Plant Production Institute nd.a.V.Ya.Yuryev NAAS, Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2017.104921

Keywords:

pea (Pisum sativum L.), seeds, antioxidant activity, DPPH, R and rb genes

Abstract

Antioxidants play an important role in regulating free radical transformations in plants during ontogenesis, conspicuously affecting their state. In addition to the plant resistance to abiotic factors, antioxidants contained in plant products can have a positive effect on human health and thus make food physiologically valuable. Unlike systematic studies of antioxidant properties of different crops (cereals, vegetables, legumes, odoriferous plants, medicinal plants, etc.) conducted in leading research institutions of the world, domestic investigations on this subject are extremely scarce.

The aim and tasks of the study. The objective of our study was to assess the content and isomeric composition of tocopherols (hydrophobic antioxidant) as well as to determine the total antioxidant activity of ethanol-soluble (hydrophilic) components from seeds of pea accessions of the working collection of the Laboratory of Pea Breeding of the Plant Production Institute named after VYa Yuryev.

Materials and methods. The content and isomeric composition of tocopherols were determined in compliance with the National Standard of Ukraine DSTU EN 12822: 2005. The total antioxidant activity (AOA) in pea seeds was evaluated with stable radical DPPH • (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl). All the experiments were carried out in triplicate. The test material was 30 pea accessions of different eco-geographical origin (varieties bred in the Plant Production Institute as well as varieties of other originators) harvested in 2011-2012 and 2015-2016.

Results and discussion. The evaluation of the total AOA of 28 grain pea accessions showed the variability range in the range of 39.89% -50.34% in 2015 (equivalent of chlorogenic acid (AChGA) 374.6-473.1 μg/g), and in 2016 the range was 41.56% - 61.46% (AChGA 559.5-829.1 μg/g). The average AOA across the experiment was 47.33% (AChGA – 443.7 μg/g) and 52.39% (AChGA - 706.1 μg/g) in 2015 and 2016, respectively. In this sample, the range of phenotypic variability of the total AOA was 39.89% - 61.46%, of the environmental variability - 47.33% - 52.39%, and of the genotypic variability - 44.32% -55.69%. Basing on the results obtained, we assume that the eco-geographical origin of pea accessions does not influence the total AOA. The correlations between the total AOA (equivalent of chlorogenic acid) and the yield capacity as well as between the total AOA and protein content in pea seeds were weak and insignificant, Analysis of the content and isomeric composition of tocopherols in pea seeds with different states of the R and Rb genes showed that over 90% of tocopherols are represented by γ-isomer. The total amount of tocopherols was higher in accession ‘Violena’ (RRrbrb) - 10.94 mg/%. .

Conclusions.Thus, the evaluation of pea accessions for the total antioxidant activity showed the range of variability across grain pea accessions of 44.32% to 55.69%. To confirm the assumption abput absence of effect of the eco-geographical origin of pea accessions on the total AOA, further investigations should be carried out in a larger sample. No significant relationships between the total AOA and the yield capacity or the protein content in pea seeds were noted. It was shown that over 90% of pea tocopherols were represented by γ-isomer. To confirm significant differences in the total AOA of the pea accession - the rb gene carrier, it is necessary to analyze the sample of national collection accessions of the Pisum sativum L. species

References

Moran JF, Becana M, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Frechilla S, Klucas RV, Aparisio-Tejo P. Drought induces oxidative stress in pea plant. 1994. Available from: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201301513566.

Novikova NE, Zotikov VI,Fenin DM. Mechanisms of antioxidant protection in adaptation of pea genotypes (Pisum sativum L.) to unfavorable environmental abiotic factors. 2011. Available from:http:// www.ej.orelsau.ru.

Gogorcena Y, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Escuredo PR, Becana M. Antioxidant defenses against activated oxygen in pea nodules subjected to water stress. 1995. Available from:http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US199770047525.

Sharafutdynova EN, Ivanova AB, Matern АI, Braynina KhZ. Food quality and antioxidant activity. Available from: http:// www.aik-journal.urfu.ruperiodical/2011/Aik-2011-15-281.pf

Halvorsen BL, Carlsen MH, Phillips KM, Bøhn S, Holte K, Jacobs DJ Jr, Blomhoff R. Content of redox-active compounds (ie, antioxidants in foods consumed in the United States. 2006. Available from: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/84/1/95.long.

Carlsen MH, Halvorsen BL, Holte1 K et al. The total antioxidant content of more than 3100 foods, beverages, spices, herbs and supplements used worldwide. 2010. Available from: http://www. nutrition.com/content/9/1/3.

Yashin YaI, Ryzhnev VYu. Yashin АYa, Chernousova NI. Natural antioxidants. Content in food and effects on human health and aging. Moscow: TransLit; 2009. 211 р.

Patterson CA, Maskus Y, Dupasquier C. Pulse crops for health. 2009. Available from: http://www.pulsecanada.com/upload/76/ad/76adaac777d3a3f3c413711f1b99a7b8/Pulse-Crop-Fof-Health-CFW-54-3-0108.pdf. DOI: 10.1094/CFW-54-3-0108.

Hamid AA, Aiyelaagbe OO, Usman LA, Ameen OM, Lawal A. Antioxidants: Its medicinal and pharmacological applications. 2010. Available from: http://www.academicjornals. org/AJPAC.

Becker EM, Nissen LR, Skibsted LH. Antioxidant evaluation protocols: food quality or health effects. 2004. Available from: http:// www.panelamonitor.orgDOI: 10.1007/s00217-004-1012-411.

Agboola SO, Mofolasayo OA, Watts BM, Aluko RE. Functional properties of yellow field pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed flours and the in vitro bioactive properties of their polyphenols. 2010. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodres. DOI:10.1016/jfoodres2009.07.013.

Troszyńska А,Ciska E. Phenolic compounds of seed coats of white and coloured varieties of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and their total antioxidant activity. 2002. Available from: http://agriculturejournal.cz/publicFiles/50862.pdf

Orak. HH, Karamać M, Orak A, Amarowicz R. Antioxidant potential and phenolic compounds of some widely consumedturkish white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties. 2016. Available from: http://journal.pan.olsztyn.pl DOI:10.1515/pjfns-2016-0022.

Dave Оomah B, Сorbe A, Balasubramanian P. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) hulls. 2010. Available from: http:// www.pubs.acs.org/JAFC DOI:10.1021/jf1011193.

Nyau V, Prakash S, Rodrigues J, Farrant J. Screening different zambian market classes of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) for antioxidant properties and total phenolic profiles. 2016. Available from: http://pubs.sciepub.com/jfnr/4/4/6 DOI:10.12691/jfnr-4-4-6.

Yashin А, Yashin Ya, Fedina P, Chernousova N. Determination of natural antioxidants in food cereals and legumes. 2012. Available from: http://www.j-analytics.ru.

Gharachorloo M, Tarzi BG, Baharinia M, Hemaci AH. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of germinated lentil (Lens culinaris). 2012. Available from: http://www.academicjournals.org/JMPR DOI:10.5897/JMPR12.248.

Chakraborty A, Bhattacharyya S. Thermal processing effects on in vitro antioxidant activities of fivecommon indian pulses. 2014. Available from: http://www.japsonline. comDOI:10.7324/JAPS.2014.40512.

Valdés ST, Coelho CMM, Michelluti DJ, Cardoso VL, Tramonte G. Association of genotype and preparation methods on the antioxidant activity,and antinutrients in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). 2011. Available from: http:// www.elsevier.com/ locate/lwtDOI:10.1016//lwt.2011.06.014.

Fernandes AC, Nishida W, Costa Proença da RP. Influence of soaking on the nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cooked with or without the soaking water:a review. 2010. Available from: http:// www.nuppre.ufsc.br/files/2014/04/2010-Fernandes-et-al.pdf. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02395.x.

Ferreira AST, Naozuka J, Kelmer GAR, Oliveira PV. Effects of domestic cooking on elemental chemical composition of beans species (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). 2014. Available from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/972508.

Segev A, Badani H, Galili L, Hovav R, Kapulnik Y, Shomer I, Galili S. Effects of baking, roasting and frying on total polyphenols and antioxidant activity in colored chickpea seeds. 2012. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/fns.2012.33053.

Rybalka OI, Polishchuk SS, Pozdniakov VV, Didenko SYu. Antioxidant activity and other characteristics of the nutrient value of barley grain. Visnyk Kharkivskogo Natsionalnogo agrarnogo universytetu. Seriya Biologiya. 2016; 3: 64-71. Available from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vkhnau_biol_2016_3_9.

Dospekhov BA. Methods of field experimentation (with the fundamentals of statistical processing of study results). Moscow: Kolos; 1979: 416 p.

Food products. Determination of vitamin E content by high performance liquid chromatography for α-, ß-, γ-, δ-tocopherols.(EN 12822:2000, IDT):ДСТУ EN 12822:2005. [valid from 01.07.2006]. Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart, 2006. 15 p.

Mishra K, Ojha H, Chaudhury NK. Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH assay: A critical review and results. 2012. Available from: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem. DOI: 10.1016/ j.foodchem.2011.07127.

Gugov YuL, Maliugenets NS. The use of computers in breeding-genetic studies. Мoscow: Izdatelstvo UDN, 1986: 79 p.

Published

2017-06-22

Issue

Section

PHYSIOLOGICAL, GENETICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES