Peculiarities of the yield capacity of spring barley gene pool accessions in the eastern of forest-steppe of Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2018.137291Keywords:
barley, gene pool, accession, yield, variation coefficient, homeostaticity, stabilityAbstract
The aim and tasks of the study. The purpose was to determine specific features of the yield formation by spring barley gene pool accessions in the contrast conditions of 2010–2017 and to identify sources of consistently high yields in the forest-steppe of Ukraine for breeding.
Material and methods. The study was conducted in the Laboratory of Cereal Genetic Resources of the Plant Production Institute named after VYa Yuriev of NAAS in 2010–2017. 298 spring barley accessions from 20 countries were taken as the test material. The predecessor was bare fallow. The agrotechnics was conventional for the forest-steppe of Ukraine. The accessions were sown at the optimal for this crop time. The standard was planted between every 20 accessions. The collection accessions were evaluated in accordance with conventional methodical guidelines. To determine the homeostaticity of the varieties, VV Khangildin’s method was used. Statistical indices were calculated, as BA Dospekhov described.
Results and discussion. The weather conditions in 2010–2017 were contrast, both in the temperature regime and in water availability, which made it possible to assess the influence of weather on the yields of modern spring barley varieties.
Thus, it was established that 2014 (yield 517.5 g/m2), 2016 (584.7 g/m2) and 2017 (593.5 g/m2) were the most favorable for the growth and development. The hydrothermal conditions of 2011 and 2013 were characterized by uneven precipitation, mainly rain showers, during the growing season. Barley grain set and ripened under droughts associated with high temperatures, which considerably decreased the yields, which were 276 and 230.5 g/m2 in 2011 and 2013, respectively.
As a result in 2011–2013, accessions with a yield of 404.1-485.8 g/m2 were selected. The variation coefficient was 7.7–31.6%, and the homeostaticity was 239–417. Accession Skhidnyi had a stable high yield (485.8 g/m2, variation coefficient V = 7.7%, homeostaticity Hom = 417). In 2012–2014, Ukrainian accessions Baskak, Hermes and Svarozhych were the best: their yields ranged within 572.6–621.7 g/m2, with the variation coefficient of 23.8–27.7% and homeostaticity of 351–366. In 2014–2016, we found two Ukrainian varieties (Podyv and Khors) and two Russian ones (Karat and Yaromir) with a yield of 600.4–753.1 g/m2. These accessions were noticeable for consistently high yields, with V = 24.7–31.3% and homeostaticity within 345–441. In 2015–2017, accessions with a yield of 565.3–731.7 g/m2 were the best. The variation coefficient of the varieties selected was 3.2–37.1%, with Hom = 333–554. They are Quench from the UK; Grace, Henrike and Scarlett from Germany; Gladys from the Netherlands; Balsam, Avgur, МІP Myrnyi, МІP Sotnik, Talisman Myronivskyi, and МІP Saliut from Ukraine; Fest from Belarus; Azik and Ilek-16 from Kazakhstan; and Shynar from Kyrgyzstan.
Conclusion. The selected varieties gave stable yields during the study years, regardless of fluctuations in the weather conditions, that is, they are homeostatic. Therefore, it is expedient to use these accessions in breeding to increase the potential of new varieties, combining in their genotype resistance to unfavorable environmental conditions with high yield capacityReferences
Iljin AV, Stepanova TI, Kalinin YuA. Spring barley breeding for adaptability. In: Breeding and seed production of field crops. Penza, 2001. P. 42–43;
Shevchenko SN, Bisharev AA. Results of spring barley breeding in Samara Research Institute of Agriculture. Izvestiia Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoi akademii nauk. 2015; 17(4-3): 592–595.
Usubaliev B. Barley genetic resources for Kyrgyz plant breeding. Alnarp, 2013. 38 p.
Storozhuk VV. Spring barley performance depending on cultivation technology in the Woodlands of Ukraine. [dissertation]. Kyiv, 2008.
Synytskyi MP. Agrotechnological bases of the performance formation by modern spring barley cultivars in the northern steppe of Ukraine. [dissertation]. Dnipropetrovsk, 2006.
Dawson IK, Russell J, Powell W, Steffenson B, William TB, Waugh R. Barley: a translational model for adaptation to climate change. New Phytologist Trust, 2015. P. 913–931.
Endresen DT, Street K, Mackay M, Bari A, De Pauw E. Predictive association between biotic stress traits and eco-geographic data for wheat and barley landraces. Crop Science. 2011; 51: 2036–2055.
Klink K, Wiersma JJ, Crawford CJ, Stuthman DD. Impacts of temperature and precipitation variability in the Northern Plains of the United States and Canada on the productivity of spring barley and oat. International Journal of Climatology. 2014; 34:2805–2818.
Schelling K, Born K, Weissteiner C, Kuhbauch W. Relationships between yield and quality parameters of malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and phonological and meteorological data. J. Agron. CropSci. 2003; 189:113–122.
Candráková E, Macák M. Yield and grain quality of spring barley as affected by soil tillage method and fertilization. Research Journal of Agricultural Science. 2015; 47(1):45–50.
Křen J, Klem J, Svobodová I, Míša P, Neudert L. Yield and grain quality of spring barley as affected by biomass formation at early growth stages. Plant Soil and Environment. 2014; 60(5): 221–227.
Babych AO, Khimich VV, Poberezhna AA. Global production of grain of food and fodder crops. Proc. of the First All-Ukrainian (International) Conference«Fodder and Fodder Protein», 1994 Nov 16–17. Vinnytsia, 1994. P. 74–75.
Poberezhna AA, Khimich LP. Structure of food and fodder grain production in the USA. Proc. of the First All-Ukrainian (International) Conference«Fodder and Fodder Protein», 1994 Nov 16–17. Vinnytsia, 1994. P.136–137.
State Register of plant varieties for dissemination in Ukraine in 2018. Kyiv, 2018. P. 447.
Korchynskyi AA, Linchevskyi AA, Orliuk AP. Breeding-genetic principles of modeling wheat and barley varieties for adaptability to agro-ecological conditions of cultivation and cultivation technologies. Scientific developments and fulfillment of potential of 41 agricultural plants. Кyiv: Аgrarna dumka, 1999. С. 148–154.
BabanTO. Dynamics of the global barley production and the role of Ukraine in its supply. Naukovi pratsi PDAA. 2012; 1(2-5): 18–21.
Samoylenko OA. Influence of the spring barley ecotype on its yield capacity in the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Visnyk agrarnoyi nauky Prychornovorja. 2015; 3: 124–130.
Tadzhybaieva TL, Abugaliyeva AI. The general adaptability of barley. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike I selektsii. 2013; 171: 174–178.
Ermantraut ER, Popov SI. Evaluation of winter wheat varieties for susceptibility to cultivation conditions. Visnyk TsNZ APV Kharkivskoyi oblasti. 2014; 16: 60–67.
Eberhart SA, Rassel WA. Stability parametres for comparing varieties. Сrор Sсі. 1966; 6: 36–40.
Gyrka AD, SydorenkoY uYa, Iljenko OV, Gyrka TV. Fulfillment of the potential performance by modern spring barley varieties inder climate changes. Bulleten Instytutu silskogo gospodarstva stepovoyi zony. 2011; 40: 129–135.
Bomba MYa, Bomba Mi et al. Formation of spring barley yield in Ukraine. Zernovyie kultury. 2001; 2:22–24.
Lytvynenko MA, Rybalka OI. Status and prospects for the creation of new varieties and hybrids at research institutions of UAAS. Zernovi kultury. Nasinnytstvo. 2007; 1: 3–6.
Lukyanova MV. Results and prospects of use of the global gene pool in the breeding of intensive barley varieties. Proc. of the All-Union Scientific and Methodical Seminar of Breeders on the problem of the breeding of intensive cereals using starting material. Tashkent, 1982. P. 32–36.
Ullrich SE. Significance, adaptation, production, and trade of barley. In: Ullrich SE, ed. Barley: Production, Improvement, and Uses. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, 2011.P. 3–13.
Bakhteev FKh. Problems of barley ecology, phylogeny and breeding. Moscow-Leningrad, 1953. 218 p.
Orlov AA. Barley Hordeum L. Moscow: Selkhozgiz, 1936. 117 p.
Trofimovskaya AYa. Results and prospects of research into the global barley collection. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike I selektsii. 1969; 41(1): 78–86.
Medvedev AM, Artemov EYa. Results of studying new barley varieties in the transition zone of the Kuibyshev region. Izvestiya Kuibyshevskogo SKhI. 1971; 29(1): 39–45.
Lukyanova MV, Kozlenko LV, Emmerikh ED. Studies of correlations in barley. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike I selektsii. 1972; 48(2): 75–81.
Lukyanova MV. Variety potential of short-season barley forms. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike I selektsii. 1969; 39(3): 209–220.
Finley KW, Wilkinson GN. The analysis of adaption in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1943; 14:742–754.
Fettell N, Bowden P, McNee T, Border N. Barley growth & development. State of New South Wales through Department of Industry and Investment (Industry & Investment NSW), 2010. 82 p.
Allard RW, Bradshaw AD. Implications of genotype environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 1964; 4: 503–508.
Trnka M, Dubrovský M, Zdenek Ž. Climate change impacts and adaptation strategies in spring barley production in the Czech Republic. Climatic Change. 2004; 64: 227–255.
Genetic regularities in spring barley breeding. In: MR Kozachenko, editor. Kharkiv, 2016. 458 p.
Aastveit AH, Aastveit KH. Genetic variation of developmental stability in barley. Hereditas. 1984; 101: 155–170.
Mekonnohttp://ascidatabase.com/author.php?author=Bedasa&last=Mekonnon">n B. Selection of barley varieties for their yield potential at low rainfall area based on both quantitative and qualitative characters North West Tigray, Shire, Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2014; 8(4):205–213.
Andreev AA, Dracheva MK, Koriakin VV. Evaluation of initial material of spring barley for breeding in the North-Eastern Central Black Soil region. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. 2016; 21(5): 1863–1866.
Sapega VA. Evaluation of spring barley varieties for yield capacity, environmental plasticity and adaptability. Agrarnaia Rossiya. 2018; 1: 3–8.
Shevchenko SN. Initial material and methods of its studying to create of spring barley varieties in the middle Volga region. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike I selektsii. 2009; 165: 68–71.
Seitkhaliiev LKh, Zotova LP. Performance of spring barley varieties in the climatic conditions of Northern Kazakhstan: Proc. of the Republican Scientific-Theoretical Conference «Seifullin’s Readings 13: Keeping Traditions Alive , Creating the Future», dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the Kazakh Agrictechnical University named after S. Seifullin. 2017; І(1): 174–178.
Hudzenko VM, Vasylkivskyi SP, Polishchuk TP. Performance and adaptability of the spring barley gene pool accessions in multi-year trials in the central forest-steppe of Ukraine. Henetychni resursy Roslyn. 2017; 20: 31–43.
Mareniuk OB. Breeding-genetic evaluation of starting material of spring barley on soils with increased acidity in the Right Bank Forest-Steppe. [dissertation]. Vinnytsia, 2015.
Surin NA, Liakhova NE. Barley breeding in Siberia. Novosibirsk, 1993. 291 p.
Kurkova IV, Kuznetsova AS. Analysis of the yield capacity of collection spring barley varieties in the Amur region. Dalnevostochnyi agrarnyi vestnik. 2017; 1(41): 16–22.
Gryb SI. The problem of the gene pool of plant resources. Vesnik Natsyonalnykh nauk Belarusi. 1996; 1: 56–59.
Matys IS, Loskutov IG. Genetic resources of oat, rye, barley. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike I selektsii. 2013; 171: 179–182.
Golova TG. Response of spring barley varieties to changes in cultivation conditions. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike I selektsii. 2009; 165: 95–99.
CMEA’s international classifier of the genus Hordeum L. Leningrad, 1983.52p.
Methods of breeding and evaluation of wheat and barley resistance to diseases in CMEA countries. Praha, 1988.321 p.
Methodical guidelines on diagnostics and methods of field evaluation of barley resistance to leaf spot pathogens. Leningrad-Pushkin, 1987.20 p.
Methodical guidelines for studying the global collection of barley and oat. In: VD Kobylianskiy, AYa Trofimovskaia, editors. Leningrad, 1981. 31p.
Khangildin VV, Litvineneko NA. Homeostaticity and adaptability of winter wheat varieties. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy bulleten VSGI. 1981; 39: 8–14.
Dospekhov BA. Methods of field experience. Moscow: Аgropromizdat, 1985. 351 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 В. А. Музафарова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.
