The evelopment and inheritance of the productivity elements in chickpea hybrid populations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2018.152138Keywords:
chickpea, hybrids F1, character of inheritance, heterosisAbstract
The aim and tasks of the study. The aim of our research work was establishment of inheritance character of most essential economic valuable traits of first generation chickpea hybrids. The study of heterosis of chickpea the F1 hybrids on the present stage is needed for plant-breeding aims.
Material and methods. The varieties and constant lines used in crossing differed not only by the indexes of the productivity, and also different origin. They picked up on marker traits, that it is possible to educe veritable hybrids in F2. It gives an opportunity by hybridization to create a new initial material with the high level of the productivity.
Results and discussion. It was revealed that were most closely associated the traits "weight of plants with pods" and "amount of seeds in the pod" (r = 0,76), and also "weight of seed" and "amount of seed in the pod" (r = 0,80). Efficiency of selection of paternal components of crossing depends on character of variation and inheritance of traits. The productivity of majority of hybrid combinations had a positive degree of heterosis. The considerable degree of heterosis of the traits related to the productivity is educed also, namely amount of branches on a plant from 10,0 to 65,0, amount of pods on the plant from 28,0 to 213,6, amount of seeds on the plant from 4,9 to 191,5. In relation to weight of plants with pods and without them all combinations had a positive degree of heterosis. The most perspective hybrid combinations are [Rozanna x (F 404 x Mexican Sel)], Efal Bold YN x Budzak, Budzak x Efal Bold - YN, Budzak x L from (Italy), L from (Italy) x Budzak, [(F 404 x Mexican Sel) x Rozanna]. The analysis of inheritance of most quantitative traits testifies that at the hybrids of F1 is observed, as a rule, intermediate display of size of traits in relation to paternal components, and also positive overdominance.
Our researches also specify on the high and middle degrees of dominance for an index “weight of plants with pods”.
Conclusions. The level of heterosis and the coefficient of inheritance depended on combination and economic valuable traits of the chickpea hybrids. The investigated traits at majority of F1 hybrids are inherited on the type of overdominance and characterized considerable variation within the families of one variant of crossing. On the basis of the obtained data drawn conclusion that created hybrid populations has great importance for breeding.
References
Nandeesha KL, Huilgol SK, Patil MD. ITS r DNA analyses in the identification and differentiation of isolated of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri causing chickpea wilt. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2018; 7(11): 373 – 379. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.711.046.
Bagde VL, Gahukar SJ, Akhare AA. Marker trait correlation study for Fusarium wilt resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2018. v.7, N 11. P. 2102 – 2118. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.711.236.
Chen W, Castio P, Cobos M.J. Resistance to Fusarium wilt in chickpea. Legume perspectives. 2014; 3: 23–24.
Varsney RK, Thude M, Nayak SN, Gaur PM, Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Jaganathan D, Koppolu J, Bohra A, Tripathi S, Rathore A, Jukanti AK, Jayalokshmi V, Vemula A, Singh SJ, Yasin M, Sheshshayce MS, Viswanatha KP. Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2014; 127(2): 445–462. DOI: 10.1007/500122-013-2230-6.
Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Purushothaman R, Upadhyaya HD, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Ito O, Varshney RK. Scope for improvement of yield under drought through the root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Res. 2015; 170: 49–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.003.
Noor F., Ashraf M., Ghafoor A. Path analysis and relationship among quantitative traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of biological science. 2003. v. 6, № 6. P. 551-555.
Talebi R, Fayaz F, Jelodar NB. Correlation and path coefficients analysis of yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under dry land condition in the west of Iran. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2007; 6(7): 1151–1154.
Ali MA, Nawab NN, Abbas A, Zulkiffal M, Sajjad M. Evaluation of selection criteria in Cicer arietinum L. using correlation coefficients and path analysis. Australian Journal of Crop Sciences. 2009; 3(2): 65–70.
Gan YT, Liu PH, Stevenson FC, M.C.Donald CL. Interrelatsonships among yield components of chickpea in semiarid environments. Can. J. Plant Sciences. 2003; 83(4): 759–767.
Sarker N, Samad MA, Deb AC. Study of genetic association and direct and indirect effects among yield and yield contributing traits in chickpea. Journal of Botanical Sciences. 2014; 3(2): 32–38.
Purushothamana R, Upadhyaya MD, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Kuishnamurthy L. Kabuli and desi chickpeas differ in their requirement for reproductive duration. Field Crops Research. 2014; 163: 24–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.006.
Monpara BA, Dhameliya HR. Genetic behaviour of earliness related traits and seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan j. Biol. Sci. 2013; 16(18): 955–959. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.955.959.
Krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J, Gaur PM, Upadhyaya HD, Vadez V. Sources of tolerance to terminal drought in the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) minicore germplasm. Field Crops Res. 2010; 119(2–3): 322–330. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.08.002.
Rao SK, Kumar KS. Analysis of yield factors in short duration chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Agric. Sci. Digest. 2000; 20(1): 66–67.
Singh RK, Singh BB, Chauhan MP. Heterosis and inbreeding depression in chickpea crosses involving of genotypes of different plant type. Legume Res. 2000; 23(3): 206–209.
Canei H, Yiedirim T, Toker C. Estimates of broad – sense heratibility for yield and yield criteria in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Turk. J. Field Crops. 2007; 12(1): 21–25.
Joshi P, Yasin M, Sundaram P. Transgressive segregants for qualitative and quantitative traits in chickpea. Int.J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018; 7(11): 279–288. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.711.034.
Krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J, Upadhyaya HD, Gowda CLL, Gaur PM, Singh Sube, Purushothaman R, Varshney KK. Partitioning coefficient – а trait that contributes to drought tolerance in chickpea. Field Crops Res. 2013; 149: 354–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.022.
Belete T, Mekbib F, Eshete M. Assessment of genetic improvement in grain yield potential and related traits of kabuli type chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Ethiopia (1974 – 2009). Advances in crop science and technology. 2017; 5: 284. DOI: 10.4172/2329–8863.1000284.
Parameshwarappa SG, Sabimath PM, Upadhyaya HD, Kajjidoni ST, Patil SS. Validation of biometrical principles for genetic enhancement of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2013; 26(3): 207–214.
Mali CT, Sable NH, Wanjari KB, Kalamkar Vandana. Combining ability analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Phytol. Res. 2006; 19(2): 323–326.
Singh H, Sharma SN, Sain RS. Heterosis studies for yield and its components in bread wheat over environments. Hereditas. 2004; 141(2): 106–114.
Fedorenko IV. Expression of the basic quantitative traits for productivity in soft spring wheat F1 hybrids. VZNAU. 2015; 1(47-1): 269–275.
Hawtin GC, Singh KB. Kabuli-desi introgression: problems and prospects. Proc. Int. Workshop on chickpea improvement. – ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. 1980. P. 51–60.
Kharrat M, Gil J, Cubero J. Genetics of grain yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Genet. & Breed. 1991; 45(2): 98–104.
Pasichnik SM, Bushulyan OV, Sichkar VI. Chickpea hybridization in different growing conditions. Sel. nasinn. 2016; 109: 111–118.
Griffing B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing. Biol. Sci. 1956; 9(4): 463–493.
Mahmud I, Kramer HH. Segregation for yield, height and maturity following a soybean crosses. Agron. J. 1951; 43: 605–609.
Mather K, Jinks JL. Biometrical genetics. Ed. Chapman and Hall. Pergamon Press, London. 1971. 382 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 В. І. Січкар
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.
