Peculiarities of morpho-biological and valuable economic features in spring barley lines and cultivars

Authors

  • О. В. Зимогляд Plant Production Institute nd. a. V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • М. Р. Козаченко Plant Production Institute nd. a. V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • Н. І. Васько Plant Production Institute nd. a. V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • П. М. Солонечний Plant Production Institute nd. a. V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. Г. Наумов Plant Production Institute nd. a. V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. Є. Важеніна Plant Production Institute nd. a. V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. В. Солонечна Plant Production Institute nd. a. V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2019.190451

Keywords:

spring barley, cultivar, line, performance, quantitative trait, yield, growing period, lodging re-sistance

Abstract

Purpose and objectives - to determine the breeding value of spring barley cultivars and lines.

Materials and methods: Twenty-two cultivars and 3 lines of spring barley were taken as the test material. The field experiments were carried out in the competitive variety trial nursery in compliance with the method of state variety trials. The forecrop was grain pea. The plot area was 10 m2; the experiments were carried out in 4 replications. Barley was sown with a breeding seeder SSFK-7. The yield, growing period length, lodging resistance, performance and its structural elements were determined. Calculus of variations analysis of variance were performed in STATISTICA 10 and EXCEL as BA Dospekhov described.

Results and discussion: The peculiarities of 22 cultivars and 3 lines of spring barley were described by expression levels of the following quantitative traits: morpho-biological (performance, total and productive tillering capacity, spikelet and grain number per spike, spike length, grain weight from the main ear and lateral stalks) and economic (yield, growing period length, lodging resistance) ones.

The variability of quantitative traits of the accessions under investigation was determined. In particular, the plant height variability was low (9.5%), the spike length and grain weight from the main spike variabilities were medium (15.6 and 19.5%, respectively), and the variability of other traits were high.

The analysis distinguished intensive high-yielding cultivars Margret, Grace, Avhur, Datcha, Khors, and Troian and the line 14-561 (5.07–4.84 t/ha); lodging-resistant cultivars Amil, Troian (Lider), Datcha, and Grace and line 15-139; and high performance cultivars Amil, Khors, Hatunok, Akhiles, and Krasen.

Conclusions. As a result of determining the characteristics of the spring barley accessions with high levels of expression of quantitative morpho-biological and economic traits, the breeding value of cultivars and lines suitable for combination breeding was evaluated.

References

Addisu F, Shumet T. Variability, heritability and genetic advance for some yield and yield traits in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces in Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2015; 9(2): 68–76.

Mekonnon B. Selelection of barley varieties for their yield potential at low rain fall area based on path quantitative and qualitative characters worth West Tigray, Shire, Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 2014; 8(4): 205–213. DOI:10.3923/ijpby.2014.205.213.

Noworolnik K. Morphological characters, plant phenology and yield of spring barley (Hordeum sativum L.) depending on cultivar properties and sowing date. Acta Agrobotanica. 2012; 65(2): 171–176.

Rahimi-Baladeraie A, Nemati NA, Mobasser HR, Chanbari-Malidarreh A, Dastan S. Effects of showing dates and CCC application yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in the North of Iran. American-Аustralian J. Agric. S. Environ. Sci. 2011; 11(2): 49–54.

Abramova MV, Dubovets ТА, Кrotova ТА. Trials of spring barley in Central Kazakhstan. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2016; 1(135): 15–19.

Berdin SI, Tkachenko OM. Performance structure of spring barley crops in the northern-eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Visnyk Sumskogo natsionalnogo agrarnogo universytetu. 2013; 11(26): 152–155.

Gyrka AD, Kulyk IO, Pedash OO, Viniukov OO, Ishchenko VA. Agro-environmental variety trials of spring cereals in the northern steppe of Ukraine. Biologichnyi visnyk MDPU im. Bogdana Khelnytskogo. 2015; 6(3): 54–60.

Yereshko AS, Bessarabov DV. Results trials of spring barley varieties and lines in the South the Rostov region. Vestnik agrarnoy nauki Dona. 2014; 2(26): 55–60.

Valcheva D, Vulchev D, Рopova T, Dimova D, Ozturk I, Kaya R. Productive potential of Bulgarian and Turkish varieties and lines of barley in the conditions of southeast Bulgaria. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences. 2013; 14(2): 97–102.

Zhuchenko AA. Ecological genetics of domestic plants (adaptation, recombinogenesis, agrobiocenosis). Cisinau; Shtiintsa, 1980. P. 28–201.

Shrimali J, Shekhawat AS, Kumari S. Genetic variation and heritability studies for yield and yield components in barley genotypes under normal and limited moisture conditions. J. of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2017; 6(4): 233–235.

Kole PC. Variability, correlation and regression analysis in third somaclonal generation of barley. Barley Genetics Newsletter. 2006; 36: 44–47.

Tamm Ü. The variation of agronomic characteristics of European malting barley varieties. Agronomy Research. 2003; 1: 99–103.

Porumb J, Rusu F, Tritean N. The variation and heritability of some morpho-productive traits of spring barley (Turda 2016). Research J. of Agricultural Science. 2016; 48(4): 132–138.

Jalata Z, Ayana A, Zeleke H. Variability, heritability and genetic advance for some yield and yield related traits in Ethiopian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces and crosses. Int. J. of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2011; 5(1): 44–52. DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2011.44.52.

Dyunderova B, Valcheva D. Heritability, variance components and genetic advance of yield and some yield related traits in barley doubled haploid lines. Turkish J. of Agricultural and Natural Science. 2014; 1: 614–617.

Ahmadi J, Vaezi B, Pour-Aboughadareh A. Analysis of variability, heritability and interrelationships among grain yield and related characters on barley advanced lines. Genetika. 2016; 48(1): 73–85. DOI: 10.2298/GENSR1601073A.

Abd El-Mohsen AA. Correlation and regression analysis in barley. Scientific Research and Review J. 2013; 1(3): 88–100.

Kozachenko MR, Solonechnyi PM. Breeding and genetic characteristics and the effectiveness of expansion of the genetic diversity and development of new various forms of spring barley. In: Breeding and genetic studies on spring barley. MR Kozachenko, ed. Kharkiv, 2012. P. 139–237.

Methodology of the state trials of plant varieties for suitability for dissemination in Ukraine. Protection of the rights to plant varieties. Kyiv: Alefa, 2003. P. 191–203 .

Dospekhov BA. Methods of field experience. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985. 351 p.

Published

2019-12-28

Issue

Section

METHODS AND RESULTS SELECTION