Grain moisture dynamics in maize lines belonging to different ripeness groups during ripening

Authors

  • Yu. O. Bibel Institute of Plant Breeding named after V.Ya. Yuriev NAAS, Ukraine
  • L. M. Chernobay Institute of Plant Breeding named after V.Ya. Yuriev NAAS, Ukraine
  • C. G. Ponurenko Institute of Plant Breeding named after V.Ya. Yuriev NAAS, Ukraine
  • N. V. Kuzmyshyna Institute of Plant Breeding named after V.Ya. Yuriev NAAS, Ukraine
  • S. M. Vakulenko Institute of Plant Breeding named after V.Ya. Yuriev NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2020.206932

Keywords:

method, maize, moisture-yielding ability, grain filling intensity, needle hygrometer.

Abstract

Purpose. To study the dynamics of moisture-yielding ability in maize lines belonging to different ripeness groups during different phases of development by laboratory thermostatic-weight method and field method using an AVD 6100 needle hydrometer.

Materials and methods. The study was carried out in the crop rotation fields of thePlant ProductionInstitute of named after V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS in 2017–2019. One hundred self-pollinated maize lines belonging to different ripeness groups were investigated.

The water content in grain was determined by two methods: a laboratory thermostat-weight method and a field method using an AVD 6100 needle hygrometer modified to measure the water content in maize grain. The water content in grain was evaluated every ten days in two replications (on days 30, 40, 50 and 60 days after pollination).

Results and discussion. The three-year study of the grain moisture dynamics showed that mid-late accessions had the highest moisture content in grain at all sampling timepoints. On day 60 of sampling, the lowest moisture content in grain was observed in mid-early lines: in 2017 – 13.9%; in 2018 - 15.0%; and in 2019 – 19.7%.

Analyzing the intensity of moisture loss by grain of maize lines of different ripeness groups, we found that on days 30–40 day of sampling from mid-early lines this parameter was almost the same in the 3 years, however, on days 40–50 in2017 the moisture loss was minimal (0.6%), and in 2018, on the contrary, – maximum (1.7%). On days 50–60 in2017, on the contrary, the moisture loss intensified, and in 2018 it slowly came down to 0.1%. In 2019, there were no sharp fluctuations in the moisture loss intensity, and the values were almost at the same.

Conclusions. In each ripeness group, we singled out lines with a low percentage of grain moisture, and this allows selecting maize lines with a good moisture-yielding ability. It was established that the intensity of moisture loss by grain of the maize lines differed, and in each of the three ripeness groups, lines with the maximum moisture loss per day were distinguished.

To compare the results on the moisture content in grain obtained by laboratory thermostat-weight method and field method using the AVD 6100 needle hygrometer, correlation analysis was performed. It was found that the results of the laboratory thermostat-weight method and the field method using the AVD 6100 needle hygrometer completely coincided for two test years. This allows using needle hygrometers to determine the moisture content in maize grain, which greatly facilitates and speeds up work and shortens the test period.

References

Kozubenko LV, Chernobay LM, Muzafarov NM et al. New hybrid maize of Kharkov breeding. Posibnyk ukrayinskogo khliboroba. 2014; 1: 227–230.

Zaslonkin VL. Sowing maize in the market. Kukuruza i sorgo. 2003; 5: 21.

Chernobay LM, Sikalova OV, Ovsyannikova NS et al. Formation and composition of the collection of slef-pollinated maize lines by productivity. Henetychni resursy roslin. 2014; 5: 13–20.

Dziubetskyi BV, Cherchel VYu, Marochko VA. Formation signs "humanity" of speed hybrides of maize. Genetics, breeding, biotechnology. Visnyk Ahrarnoyi Nauky. 2003; 1(719): 41–45.

Zozulia AL, Tsytsura YH. Relationship of climatic conditions with the main indicators of the intensity of moisture content of grain in self-pollinated corn lines. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Vinnytskogo nationalnogo agrarnogouniversytetu. 2001; 9: 10–13.

Cherchel VYu. Humidity of corn grain during harvesting: formation, accounting, value. Prorozytsiya. 2016; 9: 56–60.

Guryeva IA, Ryabchun VK. Genetic resources of corn in Ukraine. Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuriev, 2007. 392 p.

Georgiev T. Impact of energy issues on the breeding of maize. Intern. Agric. Jour. 1980; 3: 3–9.

Kitayova SS, Ponurenko SG, Chernobai LM, Derkach IB. Rate of moisture-lossing of maize grain during maturation for hybrids which belong to different maturity groups. Sel. Nasinn. 2013; 104: 66–74.

Adamen FF. Selection and seed production is the basis of maize production in Ukraine. Sel. Nasinn. 1998; 80: 3–11.

Methodical recommendations of field and laboratory study of maize genetic resources Kharkiv: IR im. VYa Yuryeva UAAN, 2003. 43 p.

Directory Classifier of species of Zea mays L. Kharkiv: IR im. V.Ya. Yurieva UAAN, 2009. 83 p.

GOST 13586.5-93 «Grain. Method of moisture content determination». 1995.

Khoroshylov SA. Genetic patterns of moisture loss of maize grain at maturing. [dissertation]. 2006.

Dospekhov BA. Methods of field experience. Moscow: Ahropromizdat, 1985. 351 p.

Litun PP, Kolomatskaya VP, Belkin AA, Sadovoy AA. Genetics of macro characters and selection-oriented genetic analyzes in plant breeding. Kharkiv, 2004. 133 p.

Chirkov YuI. Agrometeorology. 2nd ed., reworked and ext. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1986. 296 p.

Published

2020-07-03

Issue

Section

METHODS AND RESULTS SELECTION