Ability of source material to form promising lines and varieties of spring barley

Authors

  • Н. І. Васько Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. Є. Важеніна Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • М. Р. Козаченко Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • О. Г. Наумов Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • П. М. Солонечний Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine
  • Г. С. Шевченко Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2013.41992

Keywords:

Ячмінь ярий, вихідний матеріал, схрещування, сорт, лінія, сортовипробування

Abstract

Achievements of the Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS in breeding of spring barley over the 15-year period have been analyzed.

Aim. Determination of efficiency of usage of the source material from the base work collection for the creation of promising lines and new varieties of spring barley. This allows optimizing the base collection composition, number of crossings and increasing performance of selection of promising lines for competitive variety trials. Ultimately, this will result in acceleration of breeding process.

Material and Methods. The experiments are arranged akin to a competitive variety trial nursery. For the study years the work collection has comprised 141 samples of Ukrainian (63 samples) and foreign (78 samples - Mexico, Germany, France, Russian Federation, Czech Republic, Holland, Sweden, Kazakhstan, USA, Canada, Denmark, Belarus, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Norway) breeding. The analysis of crossings over the period of 1998-2006, due to which promising lines were created and went as far as competitive variety trials for the last 10 years – 2004-2013, is summarized in this work.

Results and Discussion. Selections did not respond favorably in all the hybrid populations; in some of them no line was selected. The most successful as parental forms were only 34 of 141 samples, among them 20 samples were of Ukrainian breeding and 14 – of foreign breeding (France, Germany, Mexico, Czech Republic, Kazakhstan). The number of crossings of each sample as the paternal and maternal forms as well as complex crossings, the number of lines selected for competitive variety trials, the number of lines consigned to competitive variety trials, and the number of lines consigned to the state variety trials were taken into account. By correlating the number of promising lines with the number of varieties obtained with the involvement of a given sample from the work collection the efficiency of this sample in formation of breeding material with desirable properties was estimated.

Conclusions. The most efficient by the property studied was the variety Zvershennya (18% of varieties from the promising lines), followed by Kharkіvskyy 99, Dobrodіy (15%), Pasadena, Tolar (14%), Kharkіvskyy 112, Granal (13%), Gama, Ekzotik (12%), Spomin, IR 7099 (11%), Tsezar (6%), Efekt, Dzherelo (4%), Badyoryy (3%).

Author Biography

Н. І. Васько, Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuryev of NAAS

Провідний науковий співробітник лабораторії селекції та генетики ячменю

References

Bjornstad A, Gronnerod S, Patil V, Skinnes H, MacKey J. 2000. Genetic analysis of re-sistance to barley scald (Rhynchosporium secalis) in the Ethiopian donor lines “Abissini-an”, “Steudelli”, “Jet”, “Nigrinudum” c. i. 2222. Barley Genetics VIII. Australia. 2. Chrpova J, Šip V, Štočkova L, Stemberkova L, Tvarůžek L. 2011. Resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring barley. Czech Jour of Genetics and Plant Breeding 47(2):58–63. 3. Vasko NI, Kozachenko MR, Zvyagintseva AN. 2012. Barley: methodjljgical approaches and results of breeding for resistance to major diseases and pests. Breeding principles of field crops for resistance to hazardous organisms. Study guide edited by Kirichenko VV, Petrenkova VP. Kharkiv. p. 129–137. 4. Newbigin E, Bacic A, Landridge P, Fincher G. 2004. Functional genomics in the produc-tivity and end-use quality of barley. Czech Jour of Genetics and Plant Breeding 40:107. 5. Barr A, Eglinton J, Collins H. Vassos E, Roumeliotis S. 2004. QTL for malting quality – a 25 piece Puzzle. Czech Jour of Genetics and Plant Breeding 40:39. 6. Kosař K, Psota V, Mikyška A. 2004. Barley varieties suitable for production of the Czech-type beer. Czech Jour of Genetics and Plant Breeding 40:137–139. 7. Kopchyk ZM. 2008. The problems of the malting barley in the Western Region of Ukraine. Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetics – National Center of Seed and Variety studies. Odessa. 12(52):126–137. 8. Belskaya GV. 2007. Malting barley quality sources to be used in breeding programs in the Central Black Soil Belt of Russia. Current principles and metods of barley breeding. Kras-nodar. p. 165–167. 9. Linchevskiy AA. 2008. 92 years of barley breeding of Plant Breeding end Genetical Insti-tute. Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetics – National Center of Seed and Variety stud-ies. Odessa, 12(52):24–49. 10. Tishkov NI, Tishkov DN. 2007. Recombining ability of the basic source material in the Soutern Urale spring barley breeding programs. Current principles and metods of barley breeding.Krasnodar. p. 100–107. 11. Loskutov IG, Kovaleva ON. 2007. Sources of economic traits for barley breeding. Current principles and metods of barley breeding.Krasnodar, p. 129–133. 12. Levshtanov SA, Palapina AN. 2007. Use of collection material for breeding early-maturing spring barley varieties. Current principles and metods of barley breeding. Krasnodar, p. 134–138. 13. Trofimovskaya AYa. 1972. Barley. Leningrad. Kolos. P. 296. 14. 1990. Flora of cultivated plants. Barley. Leningrad:Agropromizdat, II(2):424. 15. Kozachenko MR, Vasko NI, Zayika OV. 2008. Isolation of valuable lines of spring barley at different stages of breeding process. Selektsia i nasinnytstvo 95:31–40. 16. Korff M, Wang H, Leon J, Pillen K. 2004. AB-QTL analysis in spring barley. Czech Jour of Genetics and Plant Breeding 40:67. 17. Carik M, Appels R, Hunter A. Schibeci D, Bellgard M. 2004. A consensus genetic map of barley. Czech Jour of Genetics and Plant Breeding 40:42. 18. Lekeš J. 1996. Barley genetic resources and breeding. In: Proceed. V IOC and VII IBGS, Canada, (1) p. 191–193. 19. Wiebe GA 1973. Selection. Barley. Moskva:Kolos, p. 177–199. 20. Kozachenko MR, Vasko NI, Solonechna OV, Solonechniy PN, Ivanova NV, Litvinova IV, Naumov AG. 2012. Breeding and genetic studies of spring barley. Kharkiv, p. 444. 21. Solonechniy PN, Kozachenko MR, Vasko NI. 2011. Widening of spring barley genetic diversity as a results of recombinations of various varietal and quantitative traits. Plant genetic resources 9:138–147. 22. Syukov VV. 2007. Methods of selection of parental pairs for hybridization in self-pollinating plants. Samara, p. 84. 23. Nuehn M. 2005. Optimum number of crosses and progeny per cross in breeding selfferti-lizing crops. II. Numerical results based on expected selection responses (general case). Cereal Res Commun 33 (2–3):501–508.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-27

Issue

No. 104 (2013)

Section

METHODS AND RESULTS SELECTION

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Надія Іванівна Васько, О. Є. Важеніна, М. Р. Козаченко, О. Г. Наумов, П. М. Солонечний, Г. С. Шевченко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.

Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.

Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.

Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.