Application of experimental mutagenesis in plant breeding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2015.54025Keywords:
mutant, breeding, inbred line of sunflower, amaranth, physical and chemical mutagenesis, supermutagen, DMS, NEU, Co60Abstract
The aim and tasks of the study. The purpose of the review is to assess the depth of studies and to overview subjects that are insufficiently explored in this field.
Material and methods. Experiments on experimental mutagenesis of sunflower and amaranth were laid out in the experimental fields of the Plant Production Institute nd. a V. Ya. Yuriev and the Kharkiv National Agrarian University nd. a V.V. Dokuchaev in 2014.
The source material in the sunflower studies was 12 self-pollinated lines bred at the Plant Production Institute nd. a V.Ya. Yuriev of NAAS, which were pretreated with chemical supermutagen solution (at the concentrations of 0.01% and 0.05%) and 12 self-pollinated lines, gamma-irradiated (120 and 150 Gray). The aim was to study effects nitrosoethylurea (NEU), dimethyl sulfate (DMS) and gamma-rays as a function of solution concentration, dose and exposure. The control was seeds watered for 18 hours.
The source material in the amaranth (Amaranthus hypohondriacus) studies was three varieties – Sem, Kharkovskiyv 1 and Studencheskiy. In order to obtain economically valuable forms of amaranth, seeds were treated with physical mutagens (gamma irradiation). The source of radiation was Co60; the doses were 10 Gy, 15 Gy and 30 Gy. In addition, seeds were irradiated with the high doses of 400 Gy and 700 Gy to determine the lethal dose for amaranth.
Results and discussion. The study will establish peculiarities of nitrosoethylurea (NEU), dimethyl sulfate (DMS) and gamma-ray action on sunflower seeds and plants, depending on solution concentration, mutagen dose and exposure. The final study results will be source forms of sunflower with new features and properties that are valuable for breeding as well as economically valuable forms of amaranth.
Conclusions. One method that enables obtaining source material, which would be diverse by many traits, in the short term is induced mutagenesis.
Experimental mutagenesis is used for various purposes: obtainment of macro- and micromutations of qualitative and quantitative traits for selection or for direct practical use, negotiation of incapacity for distant hybridization, influence on crossingover in hybrids, suppression of the self-incompatibility reaction in cross-pollinated plants, induction of polyploidy, etc. At present, the research is focused on raising the efficiency of induction of original and breeding-valuable mutants as well as on the creation of fundamentally new sources of high productivity, yield capacity and resistance to biological and abiotic factors.
References
Petrov, DF. The main advantages of breeding methods, based on the latest achievements of genetics. Trudy Biologicheskogo In-te Sibirskogo otdelenya Academiy nauk USSR. 1980; 45:3–26.
Chemical super mutagens in breeding. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. 360 p.
The effectiveness of chemical mutagens in breeding. Moscow: Nauka, 1976. 352 p.
Gustafsson, О. Mutations theory and its application in plant breeding. Selskokhozyastvennaya bioligya. 1968; 1:26–39.
Gustafsson, О. Individual mutagenesis of agriculture plants. Moscow: Nauka,1977. P. 64–85.
Vavilov, NI. Selected works (Genetics and breeding). Мoscow: Коlos; 1966. 559 p.
Harten AM, Broerties VC. Mutation breeding: a Stepping-stene between Gregor Mendel and genetic manipulation (a treatise for vegetativeles propagated crops). Gen. Manipulat. Plant Breed. Proc. 1st. Symp., Berlin (West), Sept. 8-13, 1985. Berlin, New York, 1986. P. 8–15.
Kozachenko, MR. Experimental mutagenesis in barley breeding. Kharkiv; 2010. 296 p.
Darvin, Ch. Tractates. The origin of species. Мoscow: Izdatelstvo Academy of Science of USSR; 1935–1959. 608 p.
Marshall, DR. The advantages and hazards of genetic homogeneity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1977; 287:1–20.
Sent-Iler, JE. On the extent of environmental impact on changes in animals. Selected works. Moscow: Nauka; 1970. 205 p.
Kölliker, A. Über die Darvin'sche Schöpfungstheorie. Zeitschrif. Wiss. Zoologie. 1864; 14:114.
Mivart, S. On the genesis of species. London, 1871. 70 p.
Korzhinskiy, SI. Heterogenesis and evolution. On the theory of the origin of species. Sankt-Peterburg: Zapadnaia Imperatorskaya Akademiya Nauk; 1899. P. 1-94.
De Frise, H. Selected works. Мoscow: Gosudarstvennoie meditsinskoie izdanelstvo; 1932. P. 74-87.
Johannsen, W. Über Knospenmutationen bei Phaseolus. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstr. u. Vererb. 1908; 1:1.
Nilsson-Ehle, H. Einige Beobachtungen über erliche Variationen der Chloronhylleingenschaft bei den Getreidearten. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstr. u. Vererb. 1913; 9:19.
Bauer, E. Mutationen von Antirrhinum majus. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abstr. u. Vererb. 1918; XIX:56.
Zhegalov, SI. Cases of mutations at oats. In: Scientific news. Collection 4. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoie Izdatelstvo, 1922. P. 197–209.
Nadson, GA. On the effects of Radium on yeast fungi in relation to the overall problem of the influence of Radium on living substances. Vestnik rentgenologii I radiologii. 1920; 12:45–137.
Michurin, IV. The dream of my life. Pravda. 1934 Sept. 18.
Blaringhem, L. Mutation et traumatismas. Etude au l'evоlution des forms vegetales. Paris, 1908. P. 15.
Gager, ChS. Effects of the Rays of Radium on Plants. Met. New York. Bot. Gart. 1908; 4:4.
Stadler, LJ. Genetic effects of X-rays in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1928; 14:16.
Plant Breeding and Genetics Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. Retrieved 31 July 2014.
Kyrychenko VV, Poviakalo VI. Chemical mutagens and improving the lines of sunflower. Selektsia I nasinnitstvo. 1988; 80:19–22.
Kyrychenko, VV. Breeding and seed production of sunflower seeds (Heliathus annuus L.). Kharkiv: Plant production Institute nd. a VYa Yuriev, 2005. 386 p.
Muller, HJ. Artifical transmutation of the gene. Science, N.S. 1927; 66(1699):84–87.
Gager, ChS, Blakeslee AF. Chromosome and gene mutation in Datura following exposure to radium rays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1927; 13:75–79.
Goodsped, ТН, Olson AR. Тhe production of variations in Nicotiana Species by X-ray treatment of Sex Cells. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sei. U.S.A. 1928; 14:66–69.
Delone, LN. On the method of radioselection. Selektsia I semenovodstvo. 1957; 4:23-27.
Sapegin, AA. Works on applied botany, genetics and breeding. Мoscow: All-Union Agrarian Academy nd. a Lenin (UAAL); 1935. P. 11.
Serebrovskiy, AS. A general scheme for the origin of mutations. Am. Nat. 1929; 63:374.
Dubinin, NP. On some key issues of the modern theory of mutations. Genetics. 1966; 2(7):3-20.
Timofeeff-Ressovsky, OW. The effect of X-rays in producing somatic genovariations of a definite locus in different directions. Am. Nat. 1929;63:118–124.
Vavilov, NI. Genetics and agriculture. Мoscow: Znanye; 1967. 61 p.
Didus, VI. Experimental obtainment of mutations and spontaneous mutability in pure barley lines [dissertation]. Kharkiv; 1937. 130 p.
Aseeva TV, Blagovidova M. Artificial mutations in potatoes. Sotsialisticheskoye rastenyevodstvo. 1935; 15:15.
Breslavets, LP. Plants and X-rays. Мoscow-Leningrad: Аcademy of Science of USSR; 1946. 194 p.
Gustafsson A, Hagberg A, Persson G, Wiklund K. Induced mutations and barley improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1971; 41:239–248.
Sakharov, VV. The specificity of action of mutagenic factors. Biologicheskyi Jurnal. 1937; 7(1):107.
Lobashev ME, Smirnov AF. On the nature of action of chemical agents on mutational processes in Drosophila melanogaster. The action of ammonia on the occurrence of lethal genovariations. DАS; 1934. P. 174-178.
Rapoport, IA. Properties and mechanism of action of super mutagens. Мoscow: Nauka; 1966. P. 9-23.
Auerbach, Ch. Mutagen specificity. Trans. Rans. Acad. Sci. 1969; 72(1–4):273–285.
Soldatov, KI. Chemical mutagenesis in sunflowerbreeding. In: Proceeding 7th International Sunflower Conference; 1976. P. 352–357.
Kalaydjian, AA. Chemical mutagenesis in breeding of sunflower [dissertation]. [Krasnodar agricultural biotechnology Center and the all-Russian Research Institute of oil-bearing crops nd. a VS Pustovoyt (Russia)]. Krasnodar; 1998.
Encheva J, Georgiev Ga, Nenova N, Valkova D, Georgiev Ge, Peevska P, Encheva V. Application of classical methods as sunflower breeding program in Dobrudja Agricultural Institute General-Toshevo. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences. 2014; Special Issue (1):673–681.
Encheva, J. Creating sunflower mutant lines (Helianthus annuus L.) using induced mutagenesis. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2009; 15(2):109–118.
Lacombe S, Berville A. A dominant mutation for high oleic acid content in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed oil is genetically linked to a single oleatedesaturase RFLP locus. Molecular Breeding. 2001; 8(2):129–137. DOI 10.1023/A:1013358711651
Cvejic S, Bado S. Radio sensitivity of sunflower restorer lines to different mutagenic treatments. In: Proceed. 5th confer. the jungs scientifists and specialists. Krasnodar, 2009. P. 255–259.
Shuppert GF, Tang Sh, Slabaugh MB, Knapp SJ. The sunflower high-oleic mutant Ol carries variable tandem repeats of FAD2-1, a seed-specific oleoyl-phosphatidyl choline desaturase. Molecular Breeding. 2006; 17(3):241–256. DOI 10.1007/S11032-005-5680-y
Kumar APK, Boualem A, Bhattacharya A, Parikh S, Desai N, Zambelli A, Leon A, Chatterjee M, Bendahmane A. SMART – Sunflower Mutant population And Reserve genetic Tool for crop improvement. BMC Plant Biology. 2013; 13:38. DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-13-38
Fernandez-Martinez JM, Mancha M, Osorio J, Garces R. Sunflower mutant containing high levels of palmitic acid in high oleic background. Euphytica. 1997.;97:113–116.
Soroka, AI. Sunflower mutational variability when exposed to mutagen on immature embryos. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi buleten Institute oliynykh kultur. 2013;18:19–24.
Vasin, VA. Genetic variability of sunflower processing of etilmetansulfonat mature and immature seeds. [dissertation]. Kyiv, 2008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 О. В. Васько, В. О. Гудим, Г. О. Рожак
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.
