Influence of year conditions on inheritance parameters of resistance to phomopsis stem canker and botrytis head rot pathogens by F1 sunflower

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2016.74187

Keywords:

sunflower, hybrid, line, inheritance, resistance, pathogen, Phomopsis stem canker, Botrytis head rot

Abstract

The aim and tasks of the study. To determine the value of sunflower lines by ability to produce hybrids that would be resistant to the most common and harmful diseases (Phomopsis stem canker  and Botrytis head rot) and the type of dominance of mild disease in F1 depending on year conditions.

Material and methods. To obtain experimental hybrids in 2007-2013, crosses were annually conducted by incomplete top-cross scheme, and 56-90 experimental hybrid combinations were generated. Combinations were chosen by contrasting scores of Phomopsis-  and Botrytis-induced damage in parents. On provocative background, we determined the intensity of Phomopsis-induced damage in each parent and hybrid plant by conventional phytopathological methods. Provocative background was formed by short four-year crop rotation (fallow - winter wheat - millet - sunflower) in the phytopathological sunflower nursery of the scientific crop rotation at the Plant Production Institute nd. a VYa Yuryev NAAS, which was laid out in the early 70-ies of the last century. To characterize the inheritance of resistance to the pathogens, we assessed the type of dominance.

Results and discussion. Assessment of the type of dominance (hp) of resistance to Phomopsis by F1 sunflower showed significant fluctuations in percentage of hybrid combinations in all types of inheritance. However, the greatest range of variation was recorded both for positive superdominance (4.5% to 83.7%) of resistant parent and for negative superdominance (3.3% to 67.4%) of susceptible parent. In inheritance of resistance to Botrytis by F1 sunflower, a similar ratio of hybrid combinations with the same types of inheritance was found, but a larger range of variation was observed for negative superdominance of susceptible parent (16.07% to 72.22%) than for positive superdominance of resistant parent (8.89% to 62.50%).

Conclusions. Thus, we revealed the greatest amplitude in the degree of dominance (hp) of resistance to Phomopsis in F1 sunflower both for positive superdominance of mild disease in parents and for negative superdominance of strongly affected parent. In terms of F1 sunflower hybrids resistance to Botrytis, we recorded a similar segregation of hybrid combinations with the same types of inheritance. In general, generalization of the data on the types of inheritance of resistance to the both pathogens demonstrated that in 2007-2013 one third of hybrids had hp values indicating positive superdominance of resistant parent and negative superdominance of susceptible parent. The remaining hybrids had hp values typical for intermediate inheritance with slight deviations towards negative or positive dominance of parents with the corresponding level of affection. The established patterns of inheritance of pathogen-induced damage made it possible to select valuable parent that are resistant both to Phomopsis and to Botrytis for efficient breeding of sunflower hybrids. Basing on the percentage of hybrids with positive superdominance, dominance or intermediate inheritance of resistance to the both diseases, we distinguished the following sterile female lines: Skh1 A, Skh2 A, Skh3 A, Skh8 A, Skh15 A; and sunflower pollen fertility restorers - male lines of hybrids Kh 2 V, Kh 5 V, Kh 9 V, Kh 10 V. Analysis of the data suggests advantages of these lines for a number of economically valuable features, including disease resistance, to use them as parents of promising commercial hybrids as well as of hybrids that are in the Register of Plant Varieties suitable for dissemination in Ukraine.

References

Special breeding and seed production of field crops. In: VV Kyrychenko, edit. Kharkiv: Plant Production Institute nd. a VYa Yuriev NAAS; 2010. 462 p.

Sylenko SI. Inheritance economically valuable traits in F1 hybrids of Phaseolus vulgaris in terms of left-bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Visnyk Poltavs'koyi derzhavnoyi ahrarnoyi akademiyi. 2013; 1: 33–36.

Chernobay LM, Petrenkova VP, Baranova VV, Borovska IYu, Kuzmyshyna NV. Genetic stability control features to maize pathogen smut. Plant Breeding and Seed Production. 2011; 100: 271-278.

Baranova VV, Petrenkova VP, Chernobay LM, Borovska IYu. Inheritance signs of resistance to the pathogen head smut of corn. Plant Breeding and Seed Production. 2012; 101: 123–130.

Chernobay LM, Petrenkova VP, Borovska IYu, Farrakhova MO. Patterns of inheritance of corn resistance to Fusarium stem rot depending on anatomical and morphological features of stalks. Plant Breeding and seed Production. 2009; 97: 40–51.

Petrenkova VP, Chernobay LM, Borovska IYu. Genetic nature and the nature of inheritance of resistance of corn and sunflower to diseases such as power necrotrophic. Plant Breeding and Seed Production. 2008; 96: 228–236.

Kostenko OI, Kornieieva MO. Types of inheritance resistance to rot during the growing season of sugar beet hybrids based on genetic and cytoplasmic male sterility. Available from: file: // znpicb_2008_10_7.pdf.

Petrenkova VP, Kyrychenko VV, Cherniaieva IM et al. Basics of field crops breeding for resistance to pests. In: VV Kyrychenko, VP Petrenkova, editors. Kharkiv: Plant Production Institute nd. a VYa Yuriev NAAS; 2012. 320 p.

Chumakov AE, Minkevich II, Vlasov YuI, Havrilova EA. The main methods of phytopathological research. In: AE Chumakov, editor. Moscow: Kolos; 1974. 190 p.

Petrenkova VP, Borovska IYu, Kyrychenko VV. Sunflower breeding for resistance to pathogens heterotrophic. Kharkiv, 2012. 296 p.

Kyrychenko VV, Petrenkova VP, Makliak KM, Borovs'ka IYu. Results sunflower breeding for resistance to major pathogens. Plant Breeding and Seed Production. 2010; 98: 3–12.

Zhuchenko, AA. Genetics of tomatoes. Chisinau: Shtiintsa; 1973. 662 p.

Beil GM, Atkins RE. Inheritance of quantitative characters in grain sorghum. Iowa State Journal. 1965; 39: 3.

Published

2016-06-22

Issue

Section

METHODS AND RESULTS SELECTION