Chickpea hybridization in different growing conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2016.74207Keywords:
chickpea, collection accession, artificial hybridization, meteorological conditionsAbstract
Results of artificial hybridization of chickpea in different growing conditions are presented; possibilities of creating valuable starting material by intraspecies hybridization followed by selection of transgressive forms adapted to the South of Ukraine are discussed.
The aim and tasks of the study. Elucidation of influence of growth conditions on intraspecies hybridization to create chickpea starting material with further selection of transgressive forms adapted to the South of Ukraine .
Materials and methods. The experiment was conducted in a phytotron in winter of 2014-2015 as well as in the field of the Experiment Farm "Dachnaya" of the Plant Breeding and Genetics Institute in spring/summer of 2015. Eleven pairs of parent forms were involved in hybridization; crosses were reciprocal.
Results and discussion. There was prolification and blossom drop in combinations P 2774 (India) x Taras Bulba (Lugansk) and Taras Bulba (Lugansk) x P 2474 (India) in the phytotron, hence, no hybrid beans set parent plants. In the phytotron, the best formation of hybrid seeds was observed in combinations Rozanna (PBGI) x Taras Bulba (80%), Taras Bulba Rozanna (72.2%), (Rozanna F x 404) x Mexican Sell (Iran) (66.7%), Mexican Sell x (Rozanna x F 404) (63.6%), and Espanyol (Spain) x Broa CH (India) (63.6%), Broa CH x Espanyol (40%).
In the field, combinations Rozanna x Taras Bulba and Taras Bulba x Rozanna also gave good results - 54.5% and 60%, respectively. A significant number of hybrid seeds also set in combinations Flip85-1320 (Syria) x Belay noble-23 (Turkey) (68.6%), Belay noble-23 x Flip85-1320 (63%), Budzhak (PBGI) x no name (Italy ) (65.1%), and no name (Italy) x Budzhak (47.3%). On average, in the two variants of growing the best results were seen in combinations Rozanna x Taras Bulba (67.3%), Taras Bulba x Rozanna (66.1%), Flip85-1320 x Belay noble-23 (56.5%), Belay noble -23 x Flip85-1320 (56.5%), NEC 2425 x L 10035/11 (65.6%), and L 10035/11 x NEC 2425 (47%).
Conclusions. Thus, it was found that hybrid seed setting was largely dependent on the environmental conditions (humidity, precipitation). In the phytotron, by controlling water balance, illumination mode, nutrition and temperature it is possible to produce hybrid seeds, which can reduce by half the breeding process in the first year.
References
Soltani A, Hajjarpour A, Vadez V. Analysis of chickpea yield gap and water-limited potential yield in Iran. Field Crops Res. 2016; 185: 21–30.
Tesfamiechaee SM, Githiri SM, Nyende AB, Rao NVPRG. Variation for agro – morphogical traits among kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. J. of Agricultural Sci. 2015; 7(7): 75–92.
Mallu TS, Mwangi SG, Nyende AB, Rao NVPRG, Odeny DA, Rathore A, Kumar A. Assessment of genetic variation and heritability of agronomic traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International J. of Agronomy and Agricultural Res. 2014; 5(4): 76–88.
Singh P, Nedumaran S, Boote KJ, Gaur PM, Srinivas K, Bantilan MCS. Climate change impacts and potential benefits of drought and heat tolerance in chickpea in South Asia and East Africa. European J. of Agronomy. 2014; 52(B): 123–137.
Sreevidya M, Gopalakrishnan S, Melo TM, Simic N, Bruheim P, Sharma M, Srinivas V, Alekhya G. Biological control of Botrytis and plant growth promotion potential by Penicillum citrinum in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biocontrol Science and Techndogy. 2015; 25(7): 739–755.
Ghosh R, Nagavardhini A, Sengupta A, Sharma M. Development of loop – mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay rapid detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris – wilt pathogen of chickpea. B M C Res. Notes. 2015; 8(40): 1–10.
Varshney RK, Mohan SM, Gaur PM, Chamarthi SK, Singh VK, Srinivasan S, Swapna N, Sharma M, Singh S, Kaur L, Pande S. Marker–assisted backcrossing to introgress resistanee to Fusarium wilt rase 1 and Ascochyta blight in C 214, an elite cultivar of chickpea. The plant genome. 2014; 7: 1–11.
Narayanamma VL, Gowda CLL, Sriramulu M, Ghaffar MA, Sharma HC. Nature of gene action and maternal effects for pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera resistance and grain yield in chickpea, Cicer arietinu. American J. of Plant Sci. 2013; 4(1): 26–37.
Shankar M, Sharma HC, Ramesh Babu T, Sridevi D. Evaluation of chickpea genotypes for resistance to beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua. Indian J. of plant protection. 2013; 41(4): 275–281.
Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Purushothaman R, Upadhyaya HD, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Ito O, Varshney RK. Scope for improvement of yield under drought through the root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Res. 2015; 170: 47–54.
Varsney RK, Thude M, Nayak SN, Gaur PM, Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Jaganathan D, Koppolu J, Bohra A, Tripathi S et al. Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2014; 127(2): 445–462.
Kupgur A, Bajaja D, Saxena MS, Tripathi S, Upadhyaya HD, Gowda CLL, Sube Singh, Tyagi AK, Jain M, Parida SK. An efficient and cost – effective approach for genic microsatellite marker – based large – scale trait association mapping: identification of candidate for seed weight in chickpea. Molecular Breeding. 2014; 34(1): 241–265.
Gaur PM, Thudi M, Samineni S, Varshney R. Advances in chickpea genomics. Legumes in the Omic Era. New York: Spinger; 2014. P. 73–94.
Reddy DS, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Reddy PS, Cindhuri KS, Ganesh AS, Sharma KK. Identification and validation of reference genes and their impact on normalized gene expression studies across cultivated and wild Cicer species. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2): 1–19.
Shaitan IN. Influence of conditions of flower development on a different quality of pollen. Reports of Academy of science of the Soviet Union. 1951; 4: 111–113.
Jalaili NI. Methods of making the initial material and the breeding of legumes in the south of the USS [autoabstract]. [All-Union Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Ukraine]: Odessa; 1967. 26 p.
Malinina EE, Germantseva NI. The technique works on breeding and seed chickpea production at breeding station on Krasnokutskaya. Bulletin of scientific-technical information All-Union Scientific Research Institute for leguminous crops. 1971; 1: 89–93.
Vedysheva RG. Evaluation of chickpea collection for resistance to askohitozu. Works of applied botany, genetics and breeding. Kuban Experimental Station of VIR. 1972; 46(3): 197–204.
Germantseva NI. Biological peculiarity, breeding and seed production of chickpea in the arid Volgaa [autoabstract]. Penza, 2001. 54 p.
Bushulyan OV, Sіchkar VІ. Chickpeas: genetics, breeding, seed production, cultivation technology. Odessa, 2009. 248 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 С. М. Пасічник, О. В. Бушулян, В. І. Січкар
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When placing the text in electronic resources, the copyright is reserved by the author of a publication.
Authors may not agree with referee’s(s’) comments and remarks of the Editorial Board, rationalizing their point of view.
Authors may require clarification from or the Editorial Board or changes in the event of significant errors in their article.
Authors can use materials published in the journal Selection and Seed Industry in their work, mandatorily referring to our journal.
