Evaluation of sunflower starting material for breeding-valuable traits

Авторы

  • D. V. Chuiko State Biotechnological University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2022.260986

Ключевые слова:

sunflower, lines, breeding, productivity, pollen viability, leaf surface index

Аннотация

Purpose. To evaluate self-pollinated sunflower lines for major breeding-valuable and agronomically useful traits in the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine.

Materials and methods. Fourteen self-pollinated sunflower lines of different genetic origins were studied. The field and laboratory experiments were conducted in accordance with traditional methods. The pollen viability from the fertile sunflower lines was determined by the tetrazole method.

Results and discussion. Of the studied sunflower genotypes, five genotypes were distinguished: Skh808А/Kh1002B, Skh808А, Kh785V, and Kh06135V. They had the highest head productivity of 30.0–57.8 g (1.7–3.3 t/ha) in the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. We confirmed other scientists’ results on leaf death and absence of correlation between the plant height, LSI and productivity (r = 0.05; -0.11; -0.13, respectively). It was noted that LSI was important for oil content in seeds and negatively correlated with it (r = -0.57). As to the “shooting-anthesis” period, Skh808А has the shortest period of development (60 days) and KhNAU1133V – the longest one (75 days). The sunflower lines obtained via mutagenesis gave low yields (0.5 t/ha). Kh06134V was distinguished due to its pollen viability, as this line produced the largest amount of viable pollen grains (64.5%).

Conclusions. The main features of the growth and development of sunflower lines in the Eastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine were determined. The main breeding and economically useful features of the sunflower lines were assessed. Owing to the study, the Skh808А/Kh1002B, Skh808А, Kh785V, and Kh06135V genotypes with the best productivity and quality were singled out. The Kh06134V line, which produced the largest amount of viable pollen grain, was identified.

Биография автора

D. V. Chuiko, State Biotechnological University

Department of Genetics, Breeding and Seed Production of the Faculty of Agronomy and Plant Protection

Библиографические ссылки

State register of Plant Varieties suitable for distribution in Ukraine for 2022. UIPVE. Last accessed: 05.05. 2022. https://sops.gov.ua/derzavnij-reestr.

Makliak KM, Kyrychenko VV, Brahin OM. Selection of new lines-fixers of sunflower sterility. Sel. nasinn. 2009; 97: 13–19. https:// doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2009.77036.

Kutyshcheva NM, Shudria LI, Sereda VO. Morphological characteristics of perspective sunflower lines. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten Instytutu oliinykh kultur NAAN. 2017; 24: 85–93.

Mykhailenko V, Kyrychenko V, Bragin A, Chuiko D. generation, evaluation, and prospects of further use of mutations based on new homozygous self-pollinated sunflower lines. Genotoxicity and Mutagenicity-Mechanisms and Test Methods. London : IntechOpen; 2019. P. 43–57.

Syvenko OA. Manifestation of the heterosis effect in f1 hybrids and combining ability of sunflower lines – pollen fertility restorers. Visnyk Tsentru naukovoho zabezpechennia APV Kharkivskoi oblasti. 2015; 19: 161–170.

DeGreef MG, Prasifka JR, Koehler BD, Hulke BS. Registration of oilseed sunflower maintainer germplasm HA 488, with resistance to the red sunflower seed weevil.Journal of Plant Registrations. 2020; 14(2): 203–205. https:// doi.org/10.1002/plr2.20035.

Makliak KM, Kyrychenko VV.Resistance of sunflower starting material to new wolf races (Orobanche cumana Wallr.).Sel.nasinn. 2012; 102: 16–21. https:// doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2012.59808.

Kyrychenko VV, Petrenkova VP, Makliak KM, Borovska IYu.Results of sunflower breeding for resistance to major pathogens.Sel. nasinn. 2010; 98: 3–12. https:// doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2009.77035.

Borovska IYu, Petrenkova VP, Kolomatska VP. Influence of parental forms on resistance to phomopsis pathogen of sunflower hybrids.Sel. nasinn. 2008; 95: 18–23. https:// doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2008.84705.

Pasda G, Diepenbrock W. The physiological yield analysis of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Part II Climatic factors. Fett. Wissenschfat Technologie. 1990; 93: 155–68.

Tahir MHN, Imran M, Hussain MK. Evaluation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) inbred lines for drought tolerance. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2002; 3: 398–400.

Ghaffari M, Toorchi M, Valizadeh M, Shakiba MR. Morpho-physiological screening of sunflower inbred lines under drought stress condition. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2012; 17(2): 185–190.

Bonciu E. Aspects of the pollen grains diameter variability and the pollen viability to some sunflower genotypes. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology. 2013; 17(1): 161–165.

Mynets TV, Kyrychenko VV, Udovichenko AIu. Evaluation of sunflower fertility restoration line according to pollen-forming ability and self-fertalization. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP Ukrainy. 2020; 84(2).

Razzaq MK, Rauf S, Shahzad M, Ashraf I, Shah F. Genetic analysis of pollen viability: an indicator of heat stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L). International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural. 2017; 1: 40–50.

Astiz V, Hernández LF. Pollen production in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is affected by air temperature and relative humidity during early reproductive growth. Phyton. 2013; 82: 297–302.

Dospekhov BA. Methods of experimental case. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985. 315 р.

Methods of qualification examination of varieties of technical and fodder crops. Kyiv: Alefa, 2003. Vol. 3. 226 р.

Kyrychenko VV.Special selection and seed production of field crops. Kharkiv: Рlant Production Institute nd. a. V.Ya. Yuriev,2010. 462 p.

Pausheva ZP. Workshop on plant cytology. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1980. 303 p.

Marinković R, Škorić D. Examination of heritability of certain quantitative traits of sunflower (H. annuus L.). Production and processing of cultivars. 1984; 1: 161–167.

Makliak KM, Sharipina YaIu, Kyrychenko VV. Investigation of dry and yellow leaf number after anthesis in common sunflower.Sel. nasinn. 2017;111: 74–87. https:// doi.org/10.30835/2413-7510.2017.104889.

Chuyko DV, Bragin AN, Mikhaylenko VO. Effect of plant growth regulators on the vegetative surface of sunflower lines. Vestnik Belorusskoy gosudarstvennoy selskokhozyaystvennoy akademii. 2021; 2: 59–63.

Chuiko D. Plant growth regulator effects on sunflower parents and F1 hybrids. Žemės ūkio mokslai. 2021; 28(2): 34–44. https:// doi.org/10.6001/zemesukiomokslai.v28i2.4508.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2022-07-08

Выпуск

Раздел

МЕТОДЫ И РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ СЕЛЕКЦИИ