Content, forms and methods of building the environmental competence of education recipients on the basis of axiology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2022.254668

Keywords:

education recipient, ecological competence, scientific and methodological tools, educational institution

Abstract

The article contains the results of scientific research on the process of building ecological competence of schoolchildren on the basis of axiology. The analysis of the integrated educational process in general secondary and out-of-school education institutions through their transversal ecologization has been carried out. A number of social reasons that determine the urgency of these issues has been characterized. The definition of the term "environmental competence of students" has been defined as awareness of the ecological foundations of nature management, the need to protect nature, compliance with the rules of behavior in nature, economical use of natural resources, understanding of the context and relationship of economic activity and the importance of nature conservation to ensure the sustainable development of the society. The analysis of the legislative field on determining the axiological basis for building environmental competence of schoolchildren, particularly through the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On Education" and the State Standard of Basic Secondary Education has been carried out. The formation of the concept of "value" in certain periods of development of educational process subjects has been studied. The axiological principles of building ecological competence of schoolchildren have been determined, the significance of upbringing as an integral part of the educational process has been revealed. The methodology of determining the content (environmental knowledge, skills, personal willpower), establishing forms (forms of general secondary education, forms of extracurricular education) and methods (organization and implementation of educational and cognitive activities, active learning, control and self-control, stimulating learning activities), building ecological competence of schoolchildren has been created. It has been proved, that the social effect of qualitative building of environmental competence of schoolchildren will be manifested in improving their nearest environment; upbringing conscious, ecologically competent citizens able to think critically and make competent decisions about the environment; actualizing socially significant functions of education; increasing social cohesion around environmental issues; promoting social formation of schoolchildren

Author Biographies

Svitlana Tolochko, Institute of Problems on Education of National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences

Laboratory of Extracurricular Education

Nataliia Bordіug, Polissia National University

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor

Department of Ecology

Tetyana Les, Polissia National University

Department of Foreign Languages

References

  1. Pro osvitu (2017). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2145-VIII. 05.09.2017. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text
  2. Derzhavnyi standart bazovoi serednoi osvity (2020). Zatverdzhenyi postanovoiu Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy No. 898. 30.09.2020. Available at: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/osvita/zagalna-serednya-osvita/nova-ukrayinska-shkola/derzhavnij-standart-bazovoyi-serednoyi-osviti
  3. Anatska, N. V. (2016). Ekolohichna osvita: znannia i zhyttievo-tsinnisni oriientatsii suchasnoi liudyny. Kyiv, 220.
  4. Tolochko, S. (2021). Determination of Axiological Principles of the Formation of Schoolchildren’s Ecological Competence. Theoretical and Methodical Problems of Children and Youth Education, 2 (25), 160–172. doi: http://doi.org/10.32405/2308-3778-2021-25-2-160-172
  5. Tolochko, S. (2020). Reforming of the ukrainian educational system in the context of transborder integration into the world academic space. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 2 (35), 8–13. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2020.198241
  6. Liulenko, S., Moroz, L., Podzerei, R. (2020). Form of ecologic competence, which is one of the most up-to-date records of the current state of affairs. Ecological Sciences, 2 (2 (29)), 16–19. doi: http://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2020.eco.2-29.2.3
  7. Rudyshyn, S. D., Koreneva, I. M. (Eds.) (2019). Naukovyi ta pedahohichnyi suprovid staloho rozvytku. Sumy: Vinnychenko M. D., 330.
  8. Krasnianska, N. D., Slobodianiuk, O. R. (2021). Stalyi rozvytok ta ekolohichna osvita. Pedahohika formuvannia tvorchoi osobystosti u vyshchii i zahalnoosvitnii shkolakh, 74 (3), 31–34.
  9. Koreneva, I. M. (2018). Ekolohiia roslyn, tvaryn i liudyny: praktykum. Cherkasy: vydavets Chabanenko Yu. A., 102.
  10. Lutkovska, S. M. (2012). Ekolohichna osvita – sfera zmin u suspilnii svidomosti shyrokykh sotsialnykh i osvitnikh paradyhm. Suchasni informatsiini tekhnolohii ta innovatsiini metodyky navchannia u pidhotovtsi fakhivtsiv: metodolohiia, teoriia, dosvid, problemy, 32, 204–210.
  11. Shvalb, Yu. M. (Ed.) (2013). Ekoloho-psykholohichni chynnyky yakosti zhyttia v umovakh rozvytku suchasnoho suspilstva. Kirovohrad: «Imeks-LTD», 208.
  12. Berzina, S. V., Yareskovska, I. I. et. al. (2017). Systemy ekolohichnoho upravlinnia: suchasni tendentsii ta mizhnarodni standarty. Kyiv: Instytut ekolohichnoho upravlinnia ta zbalansovanoho pryrodokorystuvannia, 134.
  13. Sirant, M. M. (2021). Administrative and legal characteristics of public authorities to ensure environmental safety in the context of globalization challenges. Lviv, 40.
  14. Cioruta, B., Coman, M. (2019). From enviromatics to sustainable informatics: beyond the definition and conceptual delimitations. Ecological Safety and Balanced Use of Resources, 1 (19), 7–18. doi: http://doi.org/10.31471/2415-3184-2019-1(19)-7-18
  15. Cioruța, A., Cioruţa, B. (2016). Regarding the population dynamics investigation using Environmental Information Systems. Scientific Research and Education in the Air Force. Braşov, 411–416. doi: http://doi.org/10.19062/2247-3173.2016.18.1.56
  16. Kurylenko, N. V. (2021). Pidhotovka vchytelia fizyky do formuvannia ekolohichnoi kompetentnosti shkoliariv. Fizyka ta astronomiia v shkoli, 6, 15–18.
  17. Tolochko, S. V. (2019). Teoretychni y metodychni zasady formuvannia naukovo-metodychnoi kompetentnosti vykladachiv u systemi pisliadyplomnoi pedahohichnoi osvity. Kyiv, 574.
  18. Sankovska, I., Dmytrenko, S. (2018). Ekolohiia. Naskrizna liniia v osviti. Kyiv: «Vydavnycha hrupa «Shkilnyi svit», 112.
  19. Shmaliei, S. V. (2005). Systema ekolohichnoi osvity v zahalnoosvitnii shkoli v protsesi vyvchennia predmetiv pryrodnycho-naukovoho tsyklu. Kyiv, 479.
  20. Syrotiuk, V. D. (2014). Formuvannia ekolohichnoi kompetentnosti shkoliariv yak metodychna problema. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova, 48, 3–7.
  21. Kulai, A. (2011). Z dosvidu ekolohichnoho vykhovannia na urokakh khimii ta v pozaurochnyi chas. Khimiia, 8 (236), 9–11.
  22. Levkiv, S. P. (2014). Formuvannia ekolohichnoi kompetentnosti uchniv na urokakh biolohii. Modernizatsiia vyshchoi osvity v Ukraini ta za kordonom. Zhytomyr: Vyd-vo ZhDU im. I. Franka, 223–230.
  23. Domuschy, S. V., Tryhub, V. I. (2021). Environmental education in geography lessons and extracurricular activities. Вiсник Bulletin of the Cherkasy Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University. Series: Pedagogical Sciences, 2, 182–187.
  24. Holota, N., Potapovych, V. (2021). Osoblyvosti formuvannia ekolohichnoi kompetentnosti uchniv pochatkovoi shkoly zasobamy kraieznavstva. Interconf, 82, 61–68.
  25. Dekhtiarenko, S. (2006). Mozhlyvosti formuvannia pryrodnycho-naukovoho myslennia starshoklasnykiv zasobamy piznavalnykh navchalnykh zadach. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Berdianskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu, 3, 76–84.
  26. Baran, O. (2018). Formuvannia doslidnytskykh kompetentnostei v protsesi ekolohichnoho vykhovannia uchniv. Biolohiia, 34-36, 4–10.
  27. Tkachuk, N. O., Tkachuk, O. P. (2017). Osoblyvosti ekolohichnoho vykhovannia uchniv shliakhom spivpratsi zahalnoosvitnikh i vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv. Internauka: mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal, 2 (24), 95–100.
  28. Tolochko, S., Voitovska, O., Bordiug, N., Tovkach, I., Kratko, O. (2021). Current trends in the development of lifelong learning in the concept of Higher Education Institutions (HEIS). Laplage em Revista, 7 (3A), 394–407. doi: http://doi.org/10.24115/s2446-6220202173a1421p.394-407
  29. Dekhtiarenko, S. H., Savich, I. O. (2019). Ekolohizatsiia osvitnoho protsesu yak odyn iz shliakhiv formuvannia ekolohichnoi kultury. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Pedahohichni nauky, 2 (33), 61–65.
  30. Shumilova, A. (2015). Formation of ecological consciousness of schoolboys envi-ronmentally educational activities SPE «Slobozhanskiy». Visnyk KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina seriia «Ekolohiia», 13, 104–111. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/visnukkhnu_ecology/article/viewFile/58410/54308
  31. Bordiug, N. (2019). Сriteria and formation levels of professional competences of specialists of the nature protection branch in ecological monitoring. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 4 (31), 4–7. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.174106
  32. Bordiug, N., Rashchenko, A., Les, T. (2020). Workshop as a method of training future experts in techogenic and environmental safety. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 3 (36), 38–41. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2020.200263
  33. Bordiug, N., Tolochko, S., Les, T. (2022). Educational hub as a space for the development of professional and practical competence of environmental safety specialists. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 1 (46), 12–17. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2022.253044
  34. Song, B. L., Lee, K. L., Liew, C. Y., Ho, R. C., Lin, W. (2022). Business students' perspectives on case method coaching for problem-based learning: impacts on student engagement and learning performance in higher education. Education and Training. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/et-03-2021-0106
  35. Thi, O. T., Presas, M. (2022). An. Action Research Project to Develop Translation Strategic Competence. Hermeneus, 453–495.
  36. Sravat, N., Pathranarakul, P. (2022). Flipped learning pedagogy: modelling the challenges for higher education in India. International Journal of Learning and Change, 14 (2), 221–240. doi: http://doi.org/10.1504/ijlc.2022.121137
  37. Tsekhmister, Ya., Konovalova, T., Tsekhmister, B. (2021). Distance learning technologies in online and mixed learning in pre-professional education of medical lyceum students. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 11 (4), 127–135. doi: http://doi.org/10.51847/zly2idwa4f

Downloads

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

Tolochko, S., Bordіug N., & Les, T. (2022). Content, forms and methods of building the environmental competence of education recipients on the basis of axiology. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (2(47), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2022.254668

Issue

No. 2(47) (2022)

Section

Pedagogical Education

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Svitlana Tolochko, Nataliia Bordіug, Tetyana Les

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.